C2 vs C4... thoughts?
#16
Rennlist Member
I've seen this said a couple times in these C2 vs C4 threads (yeah, there's been one or two in the past ). A counter argument to this statement is that a couple of publication have tested the C4 as being faster (by .1 - .5 secs) to 60 than the C2. I have an R&T article from 1995 that states this. Of course, if you really care about 0-60 times, you probably shouldn't be looking at a non-turbo 993. There's a bunch of other cars out there that will win in 0-60.
The C4 also comes with some equipment standard that were options on the C2. Better brakes and limited slip come to mind (I forget the exact Porsche terminology).
Oh and there's that very cool "4" after the Carrera. That's worth at least a $2k bump in price.
As others have said though, don't worry about the car being a C2 or C4. The differences are not enough to sway you one way or another. I ended up with a C4, but that's just because that's what I found. I'd have been just as happy with a C2. I do love that little "4" though...
John
The C4 also comes with some equipment standard that were options on the C2. Better brakes and limited slip come to mind (I forget the exact Porsche terminology).
Oh and there's that very cool "4" after the Carrera. That's worth at least a $2k bump in price.
As others have said though, don't worry about the car being a C2 or C4. The differences are not enough to sway you one way or another. I ended up with a C4, but that's just because that's what I found. I'd have been just as happy with a C2. I do love that little "4" though...
John
The actual brake calipers are all the same across C2, C4 and all S models until you get to turbo and RS etc. from what I found searching.
I went C2 for simple engine drops, clutch work and less to worry about, lighter weight and it's not a DD. I have a new Honda Ridgeline for snow. I would not have been opposed to a C4S but would have deleted the front wheel drive if the awd had the first problem. The suspensions are tuned so that they are easy on the driver in stock form. All my prior Porsches were 2wd. Plus since these cars are getting older I didn't want to have one more thing to think about. Everything I've read is that they are so close not to worry about it. I still lean towards less is more personally. Unless it's beer.
#18
With a C4 or C4S I doubt it's that easy, can't confirm though.
#20
#21
Just wait until the wonky awd system in the c4 blows up on you and leaves you stranded on the side of the road. Then you'll be sorry. That extra 100ish lbs will also turn the car from nimble and quick to heavy and slow. Is that what you really want?
#22
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I personally would go for a rwd, however, since you want the wide body, C2S are much harder and expensive to find so you might have to "settle" for a C4S.
Best of luck on your search!
#23
Rennlist Member
Extra 100 lbs? So you can tell the difference in a 1/4 full tank v. full? If so, my old standby goes--what instructor has ever refused a ride along because of passenger weight?
For the record, I drive both of my 993s the same when I've had both at the track same day, same conditions, same tire make/model. (Of course the 4S is slower around the track, given that the car is near-stock.) Maybe, maybe, maybe Thunderhill T2 is slightly different (180 degree, ~72 MPH min speed). Not much, though.
#24
Instructor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jamison, PA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
John
#25
Instructor
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jamison, PA
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
John
#26
Burning Brakes
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A viscous coupler is wonky? Say the fluid dies, what happens? You have a rear wheel drive car, nothing more.
Extra 100 lbs? So you can tell the difference in a 1/4 full tank v. full? If so, my old standby goes--what instructor has ever refused a ride along because of passenger weight?
For the record, I drive both of my 993s the same when I've had both at the track same day, same conditions, same tire make/model. (Of course the 4S is slower around the track, given that the car is near-stock.) Maybe, maybe, maybe Thunderhill T2 is slightly different (180 degree, ~72 MPH min speed). Not much, though.
Extra 100 lbs? So you can tell the difference in a 1/4 full tank v. full? If so, my old standby goes--what instructor has ever refused a ride along because of passenger weight?
For the record, I drive both of my 993s the same when I've had both at the track same day, same conditions, same tire make/model. (Of course the 4S is slower around the track, given that the car is near-stock.) Maybe, maybe, maybe Thunderhill T2 is slightly different (180 degree, ~72 MPH min speed). Not much, though.
#28
Having had a c2 and now a c4, the difference is not worth talking about . I do like the extra traction in the wet . I had a bad viscous coupling when the car was having the ppi and the awd locked but was still driving fine. The previous owner had it changed and now it is a wonderful car.
The best advice I ever got is buy the right car and don't focus on the options. A well maintained car, regardless of awd our not is your best bet .
The best advice I ever got is buy the right car and don't focus on the options. A well maintained car, regardless of awd our not is your best bet .
#30
A viscous coupler is wonky? Say the fluid dies, what happens? You have a rear wheel drive car, nothing more.
Extra 100 lbs? So you can tell the difference in a 1/4 full tank v. full? If so, my old standby goes--what instructor has ever refused a ride along because of passenger weight?
Extra 100 lbs? So you can tell the difference in a 1/4 full tank v. full? If so, my old standby goes--what instructor has ever refused a ride along because of passenger weight?
I'm f**king with you. Obviously 100lbs is not the end of the world. And my viscous coupler works just fine.