Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Re gearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2012, 10:05 AM
  #46  
Martin S.
Rennlist Member
 
Martin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 9,577
Received 507 Likes on 338 Posts
Default Poor little 993 :(

It seems that our cars are a bit screwed for PCA Club Racing. In G stock they must compete against 964 RSAmerica cars, which with headers, legal in Stock, allowing the RS America to put out nearly equivalent HP to the heavier 993 car. The factory provides "free" headers for the 993. The 964 is also lighter by over 100 Lbs....so it is a tough row to hoe in G Stock from the get go, at least on paper. With the value of the RS America cars climbing, and with so few built back in the day, it would seem that fewer and fewer folks are willing to take their RS America to the track. So maybe PCA G Stock is a solid place to be...if all you want to do is race with PCA.

KalB mentions that a gear change puts the 993 into GT class...not a good place to be with something other than a full tilt race car. This means that a lot of weight needs to be stripped out of the car...there go those power windows, etc. Change the ring and pinion and you go to PCA Prepared, where you move you move up an alphabet class to H class where there is some stiff competition from late model cars such as the early 996, the 05 - 08 997 cars, Boxster S and and Cayman S cars....this I clearly understand.

Another West Coast Racing Club (Porsche Owners Club) that puts on 9 to 10 track events per year, allows a gear change with a very light penalty. Make the change to gears, you take your alphabet class, in the case of the 993 KI (K Class Improved), and move to KP (Stock, Improved, Prepared, GT). There you'll compete against lightly modified 996 cars with no gear change/ring and pinion change allowed.

So west coast racers wanting to drop $10,000 into their transmissions for a gear change must make up their minds...its either POC where gears are allowed, or PCA, and do battle in GT class. I am on the fence here as the reality of the consequences of a gear change become apparent. The other factor, PCA only holds about 3 races a years in California...I am in the middle of the state. There would be more PCA race opportunities if I were willing to tow to Portland or Utah...that is a haul.

POCs rolling race starts are at 55 mph, + or -. It would almost seem that a ring and pinion change would get you a lot of bang for your buck because instead of being toward the top end of second gear....you'd be toward the sweet spot of of 3rd...drop the hammer and away you go. A ring and pinion would also allow the car to be semi-competitive in PCA H stock...bumping up from G stock as a result of the ring and pinion. But I feel that a set of close ratio gears would be the best mod if you don't mind the consequences of having to race on PCA GT class.

Regardless of what way I finally decide to go, I have learned so much from this thread, and especially the detailed posts of Bill Verberg.
Attached Images  
Old 09-10-2012, 11:46 AM
  #47  
Nader Fotouhi
Rennlist Member
 
Nader Fotouhi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Garden State
Posts: 1,009
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

If one decides to change the R&P on a stock class 993 to get into prepared H in PCA club racing, what would be an ideal R&P ratio when running 245/40/18 F and 285/35/18 R?
Old 09-10-2012, 04:39 PM
  #48  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,311
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
In the other thread Ken stated that he liked the 964 gearbix better than his regeared one, the reason can be seen here in the typical track speed range from say 75 to 130mph the 964 will use only 3 & 4, the modified 993 will use 3, 4 & 5, extra up/down shifts can take time and the chance of having to be in the wrong gear at least some of the time because a shift would need to occur at an awkward place go up, somewhere between the 964 ratio and Kens ratios would probably be where to be, but better acceleration also comes from more torque and less weight, so the 964 gears might be better there every car is different
I see this has popped up while I was "in the dark" over the weekend.

Funny that I'm at the track today with an oh-so-properly geared car (see other thread I just posted) today.

But let's take a step back and understand what I really said re: the yellow car v. 964:

1. Yellow car is fantastic at Thunderhill and Sears. Horrible a Laguna.

2. 964 5-speed as-delivered works well enough at all three tracks.

All for now, car's back in the pits...........
Old 09-11-2012, 07:57 AM
  #49  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by callipygian 911
SWEET FANCY MOSES! Thanks again Bill! These charts are extremely helpful. One point of confusion: why would the max speed in 6th gear be different when the ratios should be identical comparing the /20 with my own scheme, ie I was planning to re-use the 1st and 6th gears from my stock tranny?

Edit: I think I figured it out. You entered 7000 as my redline instead of 6800.


Regardless, it seems like Jordan's gearset or my own picks should fulfill my starting parameters pretty well, with Jordan's set having a slight edge. I believe I will use these if all ratios remain available.

Jordan: that would be great! I'd love to take you up on your offer sometime in the near future. I'll PM you my cell and maybe we could meet up sometime.

77'3.6vram: I am guessing that your 1977 911 is a lot lighter than my 1995 993 and would not suffer from a tall first in quite the same manner. Sounds like an awfully fun car, though.

Nollie: any chance you might send me a copy of your excel template?

Rennlist is a remarkable place. Lots of knowlegable folks here. I am humbled by your generosity!

-Josh
That's correct 7000rpm instead of 6800 for the 2 charts I did Sun night
Old 09-11-2012, 08:12 AM
  #50  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

A CWP change is not a good solution
a /20 wants small changes, I know a guy, very good driver that has this setup in hid track only 993, it sort of works there


here is a nother way to look at them


and another
Old 09-11-2012, 10:48 AM
  #51  
Martin S.
Rennlist Member
 
Martin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 9,577
Received 507 Likes on 338 Posts
Smile Bill has done it again..

Great transmission gearing graphics!!!!

Thanks Bill
Old 09-12-2012, 12:22 AM
  #52  
ToSi
Burning Brakes
 
ToSi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 893
Received 82 Likes on 51 Posts
Default

I uploaded a gearing calculator to google docs for you guys to tinker with. Doesn't make plots yet but provides a quick way to compare different combinations. Enjoy!

click me -> Porsche Gearing Calculations

Last edited by ToSi; 09-12-2012 at 12:45 AM.
Old 09-12-2012, 10:36 AM
  #53  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Just a FYI
If you do your own calculations of speeds and try to compare too mine, there may be differences.

I do not use the unmounted tire diameter which is most often published is tire O.D.

Where ever possible I use the tires dynamic loaded radius, to derive the effective diameter of the tire at speed, I've noticed a few of the tire manufacturer's actually posting the static loaded radius which is a close approximation of the dynamic loaded radius
Old 09-14-2012, 04:40 PM
  #54  
callipygian 911
Racer
 
callipygian 911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: San Diego
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wow.

So, Jordan and I went for a joyride in his 993 last night and I've got to say, he's got one hell of an impressive machine.

I am now absolutely convinced that I need to work a re-gear into my budget in the coming year. This is a wholly "different animal" compared to a stock 993. Of course, he has lightened the car up considerably (along with many other performance mods) so it is challenging to discern how much acceleration the re-gear alone responsible for. Of course, the engine roaring though those Fister IIIs overwhelmed my senses even more. <Adds these to the to-do list>

I believe I'll defer to Jordan's gear ratios when the time comes.

Remarkable. Just remarkable.

Thank you Jordan! This place is great!
Old 09-14-2012, 10:19 PM
  #55  
doc_porsche
Burning Brakes
 
doc_porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,104
Received 21 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

man i need to take a ride as well.....
Old 09-15-2012, 10:38 AM
  #56  
matt777
Drifting
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Martin S.
Great transmission gearing graphics!!!!

Thanks Bill
Absolutely. That rpm drop chart really illustrates the issue with the stock G50/20. There is nothing like upshifting at 6500rpm a few times and still being in the power zone each time.
Old 02-14-2013, 01:03 PM
  #57  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

I am looking at a regear on my 1996 C4S with OEM 18 wheels and tires (285/30-18). Car is essentially 100% street use. I am looking at either going with G64-21 gearing or RS gearing. Any feedback would be appreciated.


G64/21 (ROW AWD) G50/31 ratios (RS).


1st gear 3.818:1 3.154:1

2nd gear 2.150:1 2.000:1

3rd gear 1.560:1 1.522:1

4th gear 1.242:1 1.242:1

5th gear 1.024:1 1.024:1

6th gear 0.820:1 0.821:1

Reverse 2.857:1 2.857:1

Rear final drive 3.444:1 3.444:1
Old 02-14-2013, 02:47 PM
  #58  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by il pirata
I am looking at a regear on my 1996 C4S with OEM 18 wheels and tires (285/30-18). Car is essentially 100% street use. I am looking at either going with G64-21 gearing or RS gearing. Any feedback would be appreciated.


G64/21 (ROW AWD) G50/31 ratios (RS).


1st gear 3.818:1 3.154:1

2nd gear 2.150:1 2.000:1

3rd gear 1.560:1 1.522:1

4th gear 1.242:1 1.242:1

5th gear 1.024:1 1.024:1

6th gear 0.820:1 0.821:1

Reverse 2.857:1 2.857:1

Rear final drive 3.444:1 3.444:1
Unless you go the expense of changing out the mainshaft you are stuck w/ you stock 1 & 2. Many move 5 to 6 then fill in the remaining 3 slots

if you use /21 or /31 for 6 that's ~ 172mph top end, moving 5 to gives ~157mph top. JMO but ~160 is a nice place to be but it depends on the individuals taste
Old 02-14-2013, 07:23 PM
  #59  
il pirata
Banned
 
il pirata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: colorado canyons
Posts: 4,078
Received 166 Likes on 104 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
Unless you go the expense of changing out the mainshaft you are stuck w/ you stock 1 & 2. Many move 5 to 6 then fill in the remaining 3 slots

if you use /21 or /31 for 6 that's ~ 172mph top end, moving 5 to gives ~157mph top. JMO but ~160 is a nice place to be but it depends on the individuals taste
I was aware of the issue with a C4S and the first two gears...for me I would change out the mainshaft and depending on whether I go G64/21 or RS, change just 2nd gear or both 1st/2nd. So 5 or 6 gears, steel syncros, etc etc.

I have seen a lot of your charts including for the above two setups but with a different tire size. I am running stock 18" turbo twist with stock tire size (285/30-18 in the rear) Can I assume the tire size will have little effect on the RPM drops?
Old 02-14-2013, 07:33 PM
  #60  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

Thread Starter
 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by il pirata
I was aware of the issue with a C4S and the first two gears...for me I would change out the mainshaft and depending on whether I go G64/21 or RS, change just 2nd gear or both 1st/2nd. So 5 or 6 gears, steel syncros, etc etc.

I have seen a lot of your charts including for the above two setups but with a different tire size. I am running stock 18" turbo twist with stock tire size (285/30-18 in the rear) Can I assume the tire size will have little effect on the RPM drops?
When I post i try to use a standardized setup, 285/30 will be a very small amount shorter, how much depends on the specific tire, so the net gearing will be a small amount shorter.

The big difference between /21 and /31 is in 1 & 2, the /31 is more of a track oriented setup, but I like it for street use too. The taller 1 & 2 gives you shorter drops for 1 - 3


Quick Reply: Re gearing



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:14 AM.