Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Mobil one oil formulations (w/ updated spec sheet)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-27-2010 | 08:59 PM
  #16  
vincer77's Avatar
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,237
Likes: 10
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

So Steve, what oil do you recommend for our cars?
Old 12-27-2010 | 09:00 PM
  #17  
vincer77's Avatar
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,237
Likes: 10
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Van1
Hmm, all I want to know is am I good on continuing to use Brad Penn 20w-50?

I do have some left over Mobil 0w-40 from a BMW I owned. Been using that in the snow blower to get rid of it.
Lucky snowblower
Old 12-29-2010 | 12:34 AM
  #18  
FlatSix911's Avatar
FlatSix911
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 18
From: Los Altos, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Its a little short of the 1200ppm these engines need, however the rest of the package is superior to the like M1 product.

Its what we use in the water-cooled engines that are not raced.
Steve, as an engineer, I agree with your recommendations.
1200 ppm ZDP is the minimum number for air cooled engines
  • 15w-50 Mobil 1 for Street applications
  • 0w-30/0w-50 M1 for Track applications
Attached Images   
Old 12-29-2010 | 05:07 AM
  #19  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 66
From: Portland Oregon
Default

Hi Ted,

As a data point on Mobil 1 oils, the 15w-50 product is listed as an API-SM rated product and if you read the actual SM specifications, it calls for a Zn & P level less than 1100ppm for both elements.

I've spoken to several people at E-M and to date, nobody has offered any plausible explanation for this discrepancy. IMHO, someone at that company doesn't have their facts straight or is telling a tall tale. Until thats resolved, I'm not recommending this one for air-cooled engines.

For me, my comfort level lies with recommending their V-Twin oils: something that has a sufficiently robust additive package to protect these engines.
Old 12-29-2010 | 08:35 AM
  #20  
Bill Verburg's Avatar
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,411
Likes: 596
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
Hi Ted,

As a data point on Mobil 1 oils, the 15w-50 product is listed as an API-SM rated product and if you read the actual SM specifications, it calls for a Zn & P level less than 1100ppm for both elements.

I've spoken to several people at E-M and to date, nobody has offered any plausible explanation for this discrepancy. IMHO, someone at that company doesn't have their facts straight or is telling a tall tale. Until thats resolved, I'm not recommending this one for air-cooled engines.

For me, my comfort level lies with recommending their V-Twin oils: something that has a sufficiently robust additive package to protect these engines.
It's not the SM rating that is the issue, it's the GL4 ILSAC(Starburst) rating that mandates the reduction of Phosphorus and Zinc. Since M1 15w-50 is not a Starburst or GL4 oil it can have more ZDDP.

Yes, you can get even more at extra expense from the V-twin oils or Brad Penn or Joe Gibbs or the racing M1 oils.
Old 12-29-2010 | 10:11 AM
  #21  
Slow Guy's Avatar
Slow Guy
Thread Starter
Race Director
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 10,272
Likes: 12
From: NE Florida
Default

Just did mine yesterday, 3 qts. M1 V-Twin 20w50, remainder is M1 15w50, should last me a year.
As Bill said, the 15w50 in the 5L jugs is nice (didn't buy it for the jugs though).
Old 12-29-2010 | 11:02 AM
  #22  
NC TRACKRAT's Avatar
NC TRACKRAT
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,992
Likes: 476
From: Winston-Salem, NC
Default

Van1, to answer your specific question, yes, you're o.k. with the Brad Penn 20w50 Racing. BTW, they're now offering a 15W40 Racing, not to be confused with their 15W40 diesel. I had been blending their 10W30 and 20W50 to achieve the 15W40 and I guess the demand was there. Just purchased 2 cases. The way gas prices are escalating, oil is sure to follow.
Old 12-29-2010 | 11:37 AM
  #23  
IXLR8's Avatar
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,543
Likes: 712
From: Canada & the Alps
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
It's not the SM rating that is the issue, it's the GL4 ILSAC(Starburst) rating that mandates the reduction of Phosphorus and Zinc. Since M1 15w-50 is not a Starburst or GL4 oil it can have more ZDDP.
Did you possibly mean GF-4 (whatever GF stands for), because GL is a Gear Lube rating if I have that right.

Also, I try to stay away from large spreads such as 0W-50. Over time, it isn't a 0W-50 anymore.
Old 12-29-2010 | 01:05 PM
  #24  
Bill Verburg's Avatar
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,411
Likes: 596
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8
Did you possibly mean GF-4 (whatever GF stands for), because GL is a Gear Lube rating if I have that right.

Also, I try to stay away from large spreads such as 0W-50. Over time, it isn't a 0W-50 anymore.
yes, it's the API SM/ILSAC GF-4 oil that is limited to 800ppm, the oil containers are marked w/ a starburst as opposed to the older donut symbols
see here for examples

well I wouldn't have an issue w/ the M1 0w-50 racing oil, 'over time' is a nebulous concept, these oils are changed out(of my car at least) way before the relevant packages are used up or the chemistry can change.
Old 12-29-2010 | 03:47 PM
  #25  
vincer77's Avatar
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,237
Likes: 10
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

Hi Ted,

On what information do you base the need for 1,200 ppm for our cars? Do you have wear data for these oils? I spoke with a Mobil One rep at SEMA and she was not able to shed alot of light on the subject - similar to Steve's experience. I do find it informative that the motorcycle oils still contain the high levels of Zn and Ph as they do not have the cat-poisoning issue. If the additive wasn't helpful, it wouldn't be necessary for the bikes either.
Old 12-29-2010 | 06:55 PM
  #26  
FlatSix911's Avatar
FlatSix911
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 18
From: Los Altos, CA
Default

Originally Posted by vincer77
Hi Ted,

On what information do you base the need for 1,200 ppm for our cars? Do you have wear data for these oils? I spoke with a Mobil One rep at SEMA and she was not able to shed alot of light on the subject - similar to Steve's experience. I do find it informative that the motorcycle oils still contain the high levels of Zn and Ph as they do not have the cat-poisoning issue. If the additive wasn't helpful, it wouldn't be necessary for the bikes either.
Hi Vince, here is a research paper on the subject of ZDDP by Michael Grant.

The details of Mr. Grants research maybe found at this site.http://www.britishmotoring.net/curre...ow-To_full.pdf
The short version is summarized below ... hope this helps

BY MICHAEL GRANT

The Question.
Which oil should I use in my classic car? It’s incredibly important to ask this question. Why? The reduced level of zinc dialkyldithiophosphate (known as ZDDP, ZDP or ZnDTP) in modern motor oil has been linked to increasing numbers of tappet and camshaft failures in vintage engines.

What Exactly Is the Problem?
The cam/tappet failure problems often begin with a freshly rebuilt engine that starts making expensive-sounding noises. Inspection might reveal that the bottom of one or more tappets is gone. Instead of a smooth, machined surface, the face of the tappet will look like the surface of the moon. If the problem is the camshaft, it will exhibit one or more worn lobes. Just one failed tappet or cam lobe will create a problem, as the damage results from direct metal-to-metal contact. With metal debris in the sump, here is no choice but to tear down and rebuild the engine. Choosing an assembly lube and motor oil is critical in preventing this metal-to-metal contact. Corrosion, which occurs over time when classics are not driven, is another serious issue. Normal motor oil is designed to lubricate, not to coat or protect metal surfaces from corrosion. All oil absorbs moisture from the atmosphere. Running the engine will eliminate this moisture, but leaving a car to sit for extended periods of time will lead to corrosion. Using an oil product that forms a clinging protective film on the exposed metal parts can minimize this problem. If the oil contains special corrosion inhibitors, all the better. Repair shops specializing in British cars have been dealing with these issues for years, and most have developed a combination of parts, machine work, engine prep and lubricants to reduce these problems. Many shops cite assembly lube, oil and the amount of ZDDP in the oil as major concerns.

What Is ZDDP?
Zinc dialkyldithiophosphate is an oil supplement that has served as the primary extreme pressure (EP) ingredient in all quality motor oils for the past 70 years—until recently. What does it do? When exposed to heat and pressure, ZDDP forms a protective film on metal surfaces that prevents parts (cam lobes and tappets, for example) from making metal-to-metal contact.

Why Do I Suddenly Need ZDDP?
ZDDP has been phased out because it damages catalytic converters. Small amounts of zinc and phosphorus in the ZDDP coat the catalytic material, reducing the effective life of the converter. The ZDDP level in motor oil was reduced from 0.15 to 0.12 percent (1,500 to 1,200 PPM) in 1993, and further reduced from 0.08 to 0.06 percent (800 to 600 PPM) in API SM-grade oil in 2004. But is this level enough for an older engine, especially when it isn’t run frequently? And is it enough to protect the cam and lifters in a freshly rebuilt older engine during the critical break-in period? The experience of hundreds of professional engine rebuilders, cam manufacturers and restorers indicates the mandated ZDDP level is not enough. The Engine Builders Association concluded that 75 percent of reported cam/tappet failures were due to the reduction in ZDDP. Association Technical Bulletin 2333R (November 2007) says current engine oils used by engine manufacturers in new car production should not be used for initial flat tappet/camshaft break-in. It recommends adding additional zinc for camshaft and lifter break-in. Most cam manufacturers also have specific instructions regarding assembly lube and break-in oil, citing cam/tappet failures.

So What Should I Do?
The following guidelines can help you prevent cam/tappet failure and protect your engine.

Initial Break-In Period (First 30 minutes):Use oil with ZDDP at 0.14 to 0.15 percent by weight (1,400 to 1,500 PPM) to provide the additional protection needed to maximize the chances of a successful cam/tappet break-in.

First 500 Miles After Initial Break-In:After that initial 20- to 30-minute break-in period, change the oil and oil filter. The oil you run after break-in will not need as much ZDDP; 0.10 to 0.12 percent ZDDP will provide protection without risking chemical corrosion.

After the First 1,000 Miles (Car Driven Frequently):If you drive your car once a week for 30 minutes or more with the oil between 170 and 200 degrees, you have more options. Driving the car frequently will minimize the amount of acid, water and water vapor in the crankcase, and that will limit the corrosion and subsequent pitting of the cam lobes and lifters. Using 20W-50 API SM oil with 0.08 percent ZDDP can be fine, but if you are more conservative, a ZDDP level of 0.10 to 0.12 percent will provide additional protection.

The above article may be seen on page 21 at this site.http://www.britishmotoring.net/curre...009_Winter.pdf
Old 12-29-2010 | 07:22 PM
  #27  
IXLR8's Avatar
IXLR8
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 8,543
Likes: 712
From: Canada & the Alps
Default

Originally Posted by vincer77
On what information do you base the need for 1,200 ppm for our cars?
I've often wondered and asked the question many times on forums..."how much do I need?"

The list of references in that article is long, but then I can ask another question.

My 1999 daily driver has 199,400 kms (~124,000 miles) on it. Its driven all year, just about every day with cold starts down to -20F. I've used nothing but Mobil 1 5W-30 since the first inspection. That oil has 800/900 ppm.

Having just installed a new timing belt and associated parts a few months ago, my cams and followers looked like they just came out of the package on the assembly line. Absolutely no scuffing on the approach side of the cams and no pitting of any kind anywhere, period!

So I'm wondering, how much more protection do I need?
Old 12-29-2010 | 08:07 PM
  #28  
FlatSix911's Avatar
FlatSix911
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 18
From: Los Altos, CA
Default

Originally Posted by IXLR8
I've often wondered and asked the question many times on forums..."how much do I need?"

The list of references in that article is long, but then I can ask another question.

My 1999 daily driver has 199,400 kms (~124,000 miles) on it. Its driven all year, just about every day with cold starts down to -20F.
I've used nothing but Mobil 1 5W-30 since the first inspection. That oil has 800/900 ppm.

So I'm wondering, how much more protection do I need?
Good question ...
The Mobil 1 5W-30 that you have used since the first inspection was reformulated and had 1200 ppm ZDDP when first available in 1993.
I would stick with the new Mobil 1 15w-50 for our cars.

Last edited by FlatSix911; 11-28-2011 at 04:11 AM.
Old 12-29-2010 | 08:38 PM
  #29  
vincer77's Avatar
vincer77
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,237
Likes: 10
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

Just perused the article quickly and found this intersting statement:

Paradoxically, ZDDP is also a wear agent. One paper on valve train wear points out “…that the formation of an anti-wear film involves an element of metal wastage in the form of chemical wear [chemical corrosion], and that the use of more active ZDPs causes more chemical wear.”2 The available data indicates that ZDDP in concentrations of 0.15% (1500
M:\R & D\Tech-Product Tips\British\All British\Oil_2\Article_British Motoring\Oil for Vintage Cars_British Motoring.doc
Created by Michael Grant on 3/19/2008 5:51:00 PM Michael Grant Page 7 of 25
PPM) provides additional protection against scuffing, but these concentrations will increase wear due in part to this chemical corrosion. At 0.20% (2,000 PPM), the ZDDP has been found to attack the grain boundaries in the iron.7 Simply stated, ZDDP is like a lot of things; in the right amount, it is beneficial, but too much will cause problems.
Those of us tempted to use a ZDDP additive should take notice that too much is also bad.
Old 12-29-2010 | 08:42 PM
  #30  
FlatSix911's Avatar
FlatSix911
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 5,312
Likes: 18
From: Los Altos, CA
Default

Originally Posted by vincer77
Just perused the article quickly and found this intersting statement:

Those of us tempted to use a ZDDP additive should take notice that too much is also bad.
Very good point ... I do not recommend using a ZDDP additive ... stick with 15w-50 Mobil 1 and you will be fine.


Quick Reply: Mobil one oil formulations (w/ updated spec sheet)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:12 PM.