Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

OT: My uncle may love his Boxster S but likes his friend's Bugatti conv more - w/pics

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2010, 11:55 PM
  #61  
Reddy Kilowatt
Rennlist Member
 
Reddy Kilowatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Out there
Posts: 1,155
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve 96C4S
Good points and ... the Bugatti would have to be pretty big to accommodate that 1000 HP engine! By the way, one of the Denver Nuggets just bought one.


The Veyron features an 8.0 litre W16 engine with sixteen cylinders in two banks of eight, equivalent to two narrow-angle V8 engines mated in a "W" configuration. Each cylinder has four valves for a total of sixty four, but the narrow staggered eight configuration allows two overhead camshafts to drive two banks of cylinders so only four camshafts are needed. The engine is fed by four turbochargers and displaces 7,993 cubic centimetres (487.8 cu in), with a square 86 mm by 86 mm (3.4 in × 3.4 in) bore and stroke.

The transmission is a dual-clutch direct-shift gearbox computer-controlled automatic with seven gear ratios, with magnesium paddles behind the steering wheel and a shift time of less than 150 milliseconds, by Ricardo of England rather than Borg-Warner, who designed the six speed DSG used in the mainstream Volkswagen Group marques. The Veyron can be driven in either semi- or fully-automatic mode. A replacement transmission for the Veyron costs just over $120,000. It also has permanent four wheel drive using the Haldex Traction system.

It uses special Michelin PAX run flat tyres, designed specifically to accommodate the Veyron's top speed, which reportedly cost $25,000 US per set.[2] The tyres can only be removed from the rims in France, a service which reportedly costs $70,000. Kerb weight is 2,034.8 kilograms (4,486 lb).[2] This gives the car a power to weight ratio, according to Volkswagen Group's 1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp) figures, of 446.3 bhp per ton.
The car's wheelbase is 2,710 mm (106.7 in). Overall length is 4,462 mm (175.7 in), width 1,998 mm (78.7 in) and height 1,204 mm (47.4 in).


The Veyron's hydraulic rear spoiler in the extended position
The Bugatti Veyron has a total of ten radiators.
4 radiators for the engine cooling system.
1 heat exchanger for the air to liquid intercoolers.
2 for the air conditioning system.
1 transmission oil radiator.
1 differential oil radiator.
1 engine oil radiator.
It has a drag coefficient of 0.41 (normal condition) and 0.36 (after lowering to the ground),[4] and a frontal area of 2.07 square metres (22.3 sq ft).[5] This gives it a CdA ft² value of 8.02.
[edit]Engine output
According to Volkswagen Group and certified by TÜV Süddeutschland, the final production Veyron engine produces 1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp) of motive power, and generates 1,250 newton metres (922 ft·lbf) of torque.[6] The nominal figure has been stated by Bugatti officials to be conservative, with the real total being 1020 bhp or more.
Jeebus, that's a lot of power. I'm no Bugatti apologist, but I totally understand where they're coming from. They're selling ultra high performance cars in incredibly small numbers to enormously rich people. I would want control of everything also. Hell, I'd want to know their tire pressure 24/7. Sounds like an interesting visit for your uncle, and that certainly is a very cool car (though I'm not sure it's cooler than B I G B I R D.)
Old 06-07-2010, 10:48 AM
  #62  
jungleboy
Pro
 
jungleboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Beltsville, MD
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve 96C4S
Good points and ... the Bugatti would have to be pretty big to accommodate that 1000 HP engine! By the way, one of the Denver Nuggets just bought one.


The Veyron features an 8.0 litre W16 engine with sixteen cylinders in two banks of eight, equivalent to two narrow-angle V8 engines mated in a "W" configuration. Each cylinder has four valves for a total of sixty four, but the narrow staggered eight configuration allows two overhead camshafts to drive two banks of cylinders so only four camshafts are needed. The engine is fed by four turbochargers and displaces 7,993 cubic centimetres (487.8 cu in), with a square 86 mm by 86 mm (3.4 in × 3.4 in) bore and stroke.

The transmission is a dual-clutch direct-shift gearbox computer-controlled automatic with seven gear ratios, with magnesium paddles behind the steering wheel and a shift time of less than 150 milliseconds, by Ricardo of England rather than Borg-Warner, who designed the six speed DSG used in the mainstream Volkswagen Group marques. The Veyron can be driven in either semi- or fully-automatic mode. A replacement transmission for the Veyron costs just over $120,000. It also has permanent four wheel drive using the Haldex Traction system.

It uses special Michelin PAX run flat tyres, designed specifically to accommodate the Veyron's top speed, which reportedly cost $25,000 US per set.[2] The tyres can only be removed from the rims in France, a service which reportedly costs $70,000. Kerb weight is 2,034.8 kilograms (4,486 lb).[2] This gives the car a power to weight ratio, according to Volkswagen Group's 1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp) figures, of 446.3 bhp per ton.
The car's wheelbase is 2,710 mm (106.7 in). Overall length is 4,462 mm (175.7 in), width 1,998 mm (78.7 in) and height 1,204 mm (47.4 in).


The Veyron's hydraulic rear spoiler in the extended position
The Bugatti Veyron has a total of ten radiators.
4 radiators for the engine cooling system.
1 heat exchanger for the air to liquid intercoolers.
2 for the air conditioning system.
1 transmission oil radiator.
1 differential oil radiator.
1 engine oil radiator.
It has a drag coefficient of 0.41 (normal condition) and 0.36 (after lowering to the ground),[4] and a frontal area of 2.07 square metres (22.3 sq ft).[5] This gives it a CdA ft² value of 8.02.
[edit]Engine output
According to Volkswagen Group and certified by TÜV Süddeutschland, the final production Veyron engine produces 1,001 metric horsepower (736 kW; 987 bhp) of motive power, and generates 1,250 newton metres (922 ft·lbf) of torque.[6] The nominal figure has been stated by Bugatti officials to be conservative, with the real total being 1020 bhp or more.
Steve, you sure have done quite a bit of research on the veyron. So, are you trying to lead us astray by telling us that you're trading in your 993 for a Lexus, when it's really going to be a Veyron??
Old 06-07-2010, 11:12 AM
  #63  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Cool story.

I'm surprised to see so many p-car guys who like the Veyron. Seems like the Bugattis & Lambos are for uber-rich tycoons who know nothing about cars, whereas real car enthusiasts would take a Ferrari, CGT, Pagani, Saleen, etc.
Old 06-09-2010, 12:11 AM
  #64  
Steve 96C4S
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Steve 96C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Gaithersburg, MD.
Posts: 6,590
Received 864 Likes on 438 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jungleboy
Steve, you sure have done quite a bit of research on the veyron. So, are you trying to lead us astray by telling us that you're trading in your 993 for a Lexus, when it's really going to be a Veyron??
Not much research, just a 1 second click to Wikipedia.

Yes, I'm looking very serious at the Veyron, now. )

Here's a cool article comparing it to the 1991 Bugatti. Amazing comparisons...

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...son/index.html





Comparison: 2010 Bugatti Veyron vs 1992 Bugatti EB 110 SS
Even Before the Veyron, Bugatti Meant Fast
June 07, 2010 / By Dale Drinnon

Oddly enough, it was only about a half-hour into the test drive before I felt ready to turn the Veyron loose. It usually takes much more settling-in time for me to be comfortable with really cracking the whip over an unfamiliar car on unfamiliar roads, especially a car with 1001 horsepower and a mach-speed reputation.

But after a few miles of cruising quiet French lanes and making progressively faster sprints through the gears, I was pretty confident with the thing. Tremendous acceleration, yeah, but still completely civilized and dead easy to drive; your dear old aunt could idle it along to Sunday School. So once I found a nice healthy hole in traffic on the four-lane near the Bugatti factory in Molsheim, I eased it up to about 70, took a good look around and boldly stomped the throttle toward the floor.

The genteelly muted engine rumble behind me instantly erupted into a bellowing B-movie Tyrannosaurus Rex and the power spike slammed the seat against my back so hard I honestly thought the rear end of the car had exploded. My foot couldn't have came off that accelerator any faster if the pedal was wired up to a wall socket, and I shrieked out loud like a little girl.

Fast? Oh Lordie yes, it's fast, two-and-a-bit genuine seconds to sixty, 250 certified mph fast, and I'm sure anyone who can read knows that by now. The interesting thing, though, is it's a different kind of fast, and in more ways than the Jekyll and Hyde act. The difference is obvious merely from the car's appearance; it's more obvious still after a back-to-back drive in the last Bugatti to claim the "Fastest" title, the late, great EB110.

You don't hear that much about the EB110 any more, which speaks volumes about the surge in supercar performance over the past decade or so. In the early '90s, however, the 110 was King of the Hill. With a 3.5-liter, 553 horse V-12, a 0-60 mph time of 3.4 seconds and a 213-mph top speed, it out-paced the Ferrari F40, and it's still faster than many of the newer machines you'll find occupying internet ultimate-supercar fantasy lists.

Launched in 1991, it was the first production car with a carbon-fiber monocoque (just nipping the McLaren F1), the first with quad turbos, and featured full-time four-wheel drive-and you can bet the farm the Volkswagen Group engineers of the 4WD, quad turbo, carbon-chassis Veyron gave the 110 a thorough once-over during their design deliberations.

Any similarities between the two cars, though, are strictly acquired characteristics; they share no bloodlines whatsoever. This particular Bugatti revival was an Italian project from the start. Organized by entrepreneur and former Ferrari dealer Romano Artioli, and drawing on largely former-Lamborghini talent, including Miura/Countach/Diablo stylist Marcello Gandini, the enterprise was even located outside Modena, the better to soak up positive Karma.

It worked, too, at least until the combination of over-expansion and global recession killed the company in '95. The EB110 was not only the Fastest, it was good enough that young Michael Schumacher bought one out of his very own money, and kept it well into his Ferrari years.
That it's microscopically slower than the Veyron should only be of real world consequence if you're fussy about exactly what size cannon you're being shot out of. The lightweight, 603 horsepower Super Sport version of the EB110 we're driving here is actually three-tenths and seven mph faster than the "base" car and, although there's significant low-rpm turbo lag, when the fans start to whistle at four grand, you'd better have hold of something solid: life is about to get interesting.

It's also a pretty substantial, well-built and agile piece of machinery, with nicely responsive brakes and steering and a precise six-speed manual transmission. On the open road it drives smaller and lighter than it is and you can zip into corners with a little heel and toe dance on the pedals and the V-12 singing, and come out the other side with a smile.

The problem is getting it to the open road in the first place. Everyday driving isn't the car's strong suit: the mirrors are virtually useless, the frame of the cute little tollbooth side window is perfectly positioned for blocking peripheral vision, gentle launches leave it stumbling off the line, and it has the turning circle of an aircraft carrier. City driving is like flying an F16 inside the hanger, and the only viable lane change technique on crowded expressways is stab the power and trust you'll blast into the gap before anybody else can get there. In short, it's every inch a true Italian exotic.

The Veyron, on the other hand, definitely ain't. It is indeed shatteringly fast, even after you know what's coming if you kick it, yet eminently drivable; the flexible 8-liter W-16 is never short of grunt, and much of the typical supercar silliness simply isn't there. The doors, for example, open like doors (and I'm sorry Marcello, but that scissor-hinge idea is as silly as they come), the interior is cozy and sumptuous, and except for the blind rear quarters, you can actually see out of it, by exotic standards anyway.

Which is not to say the Veyron lacks silliness of its own: the electronic parking brake is a pain, a tiny press-and-hold toggle thingie hidden down beside the seat track, the only surface without a big "EB" on it is the windshield, and imagine, if you dare, the exposed engine bay after five rainy minutes trailing behind a semi in a construction zone. It's probably best, too, we don't discuss the million-plus price tag and the upkeep costs. Those rear tires are not only almost as wide as the first VW Beetle sold in America, they're about ten times as expensive, and last just slightly longer than a bag of Oreos at a Deadhead reunion.

If the EB 110 is a traditional supercar of the race-rep persuasion, then the Veyron, it's generally acknowledged, is quite possibly the definitive gentleman's Gran Turismo. Or more properly, if truth be told, the definitive Grand Routier. That's rather likely what VW had in mind when it bought the Bugatti name, returned it to its old home in Molsheim, and hung a good deal of brand-image corporate cred on building this car-a resurrection of the great French pre-war Grand Routier blend of performance, luxury, elegance, and style.

It's a different concept from a modern GT; companies like Delahaye, Voisin, and of course Bugatti itself weren't concerned with merely producing fast, roadable cars that looked good. They were concerned with creating high-speed Art Deco, unique cars of presence and personality that went as audaciously as they looked; it's no coincidence that Ettore Bugatti came from a family of artists, you can see it in his automobiles, and that, not simply their speed, is what makes the name worth owning today.

And love the Veyron or hate it, you gotta give the guys credit: with every other car in the ultimate-supercar sweepstakes sticking firmly to the Le Mans-car-with-leather principle, building a Fastest by the classic formula of Talbot Lago and Delage took some real stones.
Old 06-09-2010, 03:23 AM
  #65  
ZAMIRZ
Three Wheelin'
 
ZAMIRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
The whole windshield thing still boggles my mind.
That's the kind of proprietary-bull****-exclusivity reserved for the ultra-rich. No thanks.
It's a $2.2 million dollar car with a top-speed of 250mph, what do you expect? Frank the glass guy to show up with his rusty van and replace the windshield in your driveway with a black screwdriver and some tube caulk? I didn't think so...

You want Gus down at America's Tire changing the tire on your 250mph car? Please.

Is it expensive? Yeah, if you're working a 9 to 5 making a hundred grand a year, you bet it's expensive. But if you're in a position to drop $2.2 million on a car, a hundred grand here or there for a tire or windshield should not bother or alarm you. If it does, you can't afford it. Not to mention, the fleet of cars you already own isn't going to force you to bum rides to work. You're probably not even going to notice how long the car's out of commission until your personal assistant says "hey boss, your Bugatti's back." It's just the cost of playing at that level...

It's all relative. I'm sure somebody who could care less about Porsches and drives a Toyota Corolla would say the same about our parts and windshields with the integrated antenna.
Old 06-09-2010, 08:35 AM
  #66  
AOW162435
Seared
Rennlist Member
 
AOW162435's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Posts: 16,777
Received 418 Likes on 233 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZAMIRZ
It's a $2.2 million dollar car with a top-speed of 250mph, what do you expect? Frank the glass guy to show up with his rusty van and replace the windshield in your driveway with a black screwdriver and some tube caulk? I didn't think so...

You want Gus down at America's Tire changing the tire on your 250mph car? Please.

Is it expensive? Yeah, if you're working a 9 to 5 making a hundred grand a year, you bet it's expensive. But if you're in a position to drop $2.2 million on a car, a hundred grand here or there for a tire or windshield should not bother or alarm you. If it does, you can't afford it. Not to mention, the fleet of cars you already own isn't going to force you to bum rides to work. You're probably not even going to notice how long the car's out of commission until your personal assistant says "hey boss, your Bugatti's back." It's just the cost of playing at that level...

It's all relative. I'm sure somebody who could care less about Porsches and drives a Toyota Corolla would say the same about our parts and windshields with the integrated antenna.
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
Old 06-09-2010, 12:54 PM
  #67  
gonzilla
Rennlist Member
 
gonzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Redondo Beach, CA
Posts: 3,997
Received 102 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

$60K and a trip across the Atlantic for a windshield? HAHAHA!!! I guess us 'mericans are too stupid to figure it out. Same goes for the $45K French mount and balance.

Last edited by gonzilla; 06-09-2010 at 02:56 PM.
Old 06-09-2010, 01:19 PM
  #68  
goofballdeluxe
Rennlist Member
 
goofballdeluxe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,942
Likes: 0
Received 151 Likes on 98 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
Old 06-09-2010, 04:48 PM
  #69  
ZAMIRZ
Three Wheelin'
 
ZAMIRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
Old 06-09-2010, 06:55 PM
  #70  
timothymoffat
Rennlist Member
 
timothymoffat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Rainforest (Vancouver, BC)
Posts: 7,584
Received 1,043 Likes on 470 Posts
Default

^^^^Comedy hour started early here on the west coast. First, Jason's internet car-forum video, now the last few posts on this thread. Funny stuff!
Old 06-09-2010, 08:50 PM
  #71  
cabrio993
Race Car
 
cabrio993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 4,682
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
LOL!!
Old 06-09-2010, 11:06 PM
  #72  
Canyon56
Burning Brakes
 
Canyon56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
LOL.

Don't you love it when your sixth grade teacher comes back to haunt you?
Old 09-01-2010, 04:49 PM
  #73  
JezH
1st Gear
 
JezH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I live in the the UK and got overtaken by L2 this morning

I was on my daily commute west on the M4 (southern England, between Reading and Newbury) this morning at about 8am and the car came up behind me (I was in my oh so sporty Audi A4 estate) when I'd overtaken a few cars pulled over to the middle lane and the car flew past - really stank actually, but I guess you'd expect it to on max power - fair amount of exhuast fumes!

Thought I'd google "veyron L2 convertible" and this thread came up
Old 09-01-2010, 06:00 PM
  #74  
TRINITONY
Rennlist Member
 
TRINITONY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: I should be in TNT for Carnival!
Posts: 10,200
Received 312 Likes on 253 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AOW162435
Thanks for clarifying. That really helped.

I can't believe I was so naive.


Andreas
classic...
Old 09-02-2010, 12:00 AM
  #75  
plymouthcolt
Instructor
 
plymouthcolt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I heard that before Bugatti will grant you the privilege of owning one of their masterpieces, you must send in a stool sample for testing.

If it don't stink-they'll take your check!

This may be a rumour though.



Quick Reply: OT: My uncle may love his Boxster S but likes his friend's Bugatti conv more - w/pics



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:20 AM.