Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

The pro's and con's of regearing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-05-2009, 12:57 AM
  #1  
David Stamm
Track Day
Thread Starter
 
David Stamm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default The pro's and con's of regearing

What's invloved, the cost and what are the pro's and con's to regear?
Old 06-05-2009, 01:01 AM
  #2  
face-ache
Instructor
 
face-ache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: white rock b.c
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Lots of threads on that. only con is the cost! around 6k
Old 06-05-2009, 01:16 AM
  #3  
targagr
Pro
 
targagr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: montreal,canada
Posts: 573
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

ive only heard of pros for regearing and yes only cost is the con...acceleration is a big pro but how much does it improve acceleration lets say at 1/4mile? is it worth it for street driving or do you feel the acceleration improvement only on a track??
Old 06-05-2009, 04:15 AM
  #4  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by David Stamm
What's invloved, the cost and what are the pro's and con's to regear?
Hi David,

The costs vary by which gears you wish to change and what year your car is ('96-'98 cars have fixed second gears and require mainshaft replacement to lower 2nd gear). The final parts list varies by which parts may be needed to rebuild the gearbox such as syncros, operating sleeves, anchor blocks, etc.

Another variable is the LSD and whether you wish to simply install new plates or replace it with something much better,...

The "pros" are much increased acceleration and the "cons" are a a slightly reduced top speed (171 to 155-160 MPH) and the hit to the wallet, naturally,..

It makes a huge difference if its done right.
Old 06-05-2009, 08:12 AM
  #5  
J.PELLEGRINO
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
J.PELLEGRINO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NATICK MASS.
Posts: 231
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

David, We do this upgrade whenever possible, the benefits are that substantial. We do not usually change 2nd gear, but instead focus on gears 3-6. This has proven to be where most drivers garner the best bang for the buck, and as Steve points out, it can be a very big BANG..

Be well and good luck, Jerry
Old 06-05-2009, 10:13 AM
  #6  
Martin S.
Rennlist Member
 
Martin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 9,611
Received 525 Likes on 347 Posts
Default If I had $6,000 to...

"invest", actually I have heard the cost can be higher, but maybe that just for me. Everybody else pays $6,000.

I have driven a 96 993 on the track and the streets with the close ration gears and a PMS LSD...it feels great, you are always in the torque band. I dont know if the car is actually any faster (It should be), but it sure feels that way. Great "investment"....I'll do it when wifey gets a better job.
Old 06-05-2009, 10:46 AM
  #7  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,358
Received 566 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

They say a picture is worth a 1000 words,

Here's a comparison of a PMS box and a stock US box, same chassis/engine


Most don't regear 1 & 2 because of the cost of replacing the mainshaft, but taller motorsports 1 & 2 are extremely useful for track guys
Old 06-05-2009, 11:11 AM
  #8  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,065
Received 36 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

I'm sure it's nice but dang it's expensive. In terms of bang-for-your-buck, it seems really poor IMHO. Perhaps it makes sense if you're an ultra-competitive cheating club racer but otherwise, if you're looking for speed, you need a couple turbos.
Old 06-05-2009, 11:13 AM
  #9  
boulderbobo
Three Wheelin'
 
boulderbobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,599
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems

the "cons" are a a slightly reduced top speed (171 to 155-160 MPH)


I'm not sure I could live with this...

Old 06-05-2009, 12:22 PM
  #10  
Rinty
Drifting
 
Rinty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 2,650
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Does anyone know whether, if you chose to re gear, leaving the stock 2nd gear in, and going with a taller 1st gear, the car would bog a bit, from a standstill?

My issue is with the approximate 1200 rpm split between those two gears.
Old 06-05-2009, 12:26 PM
  #11  
Mark in Baltimore
Rennlist Member
 
Mark in Baltimore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 23,303
Received 499 Likes on 320 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
I'm sure it's nice but dang it's expensive. In terms of bang-for-your-buck, it seems really poor IMHO. Perhaps it makes sense if you're an ultra-competitive cheating club racer but otherwise, if you're looking for speed, you need a couple turbos.
One downside not mentioned is that if you ever plan on club racing your car in PCA's stock class, with a short gearbox your car will be illegal in stock or will be bumped to GT, where you will be a rolling chicane.
Old 06-05-2009, 12:29 PM
  #12  
Cactus
Noodle Jr.
Rennlist Member
 
Cactus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Mountville, PA
Posts: 9,911
Received 228 Likes on 144 Posts
Default

WANT!
Old 06-05-2009, 12:34 PM
  #13  
JM993
Banned
 
JM993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,361
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rinty
Does anyone know whether, if you chose to re gear, leaving the stock 2nd gear in, and going with a taller 1st gear, the car would bog a bit, from a standstill?

My issue is with the approximate 1200 rpm split between those two gears.
The RS is geared like this. IMHO, I'd prefer the stock 1st gear for a street car, a tall first is better for a track car. Trouble is, if you keep 1st, you really want to change 2nd as the gap between 1st and 2nd is too large.
Old 06-05-2009, 12:39 PM
  #14  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,358
Received 566 Likes on 390 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
I'm sure it's nice but dang it's expensive. In terms of bang-for-your-buck, it seems really poor IMHO. Perhaps it makes sense if you're an ultra-competitive cheating club racer but otherwise, if you're looking for speed, you need a couple turbos.
It makes sense for anyone w/ any sporting sense at all. Stock g50/20 gearing was a result of EPA fuel economy mandates. The resultwas a 6 that was unuseable anywhere but on a 65mph freeway, the others were more or less filled in.

It mat noot sound like much but reducing the theoretical top end from g50/20 186@6800 to 163 is huge in terms of all around useability and fun factor, cruise rpm goes up some but it's is a none issue, 3000 rpm cruise /20 is 82mpg /30 is 72mph

Of course there are ots of other choices for the gearing, I have just found ~ 163top is ideal for a dual purpose car.

Of course if you race in a stock class you can't do this, but that isn't the point of the duscusssion.

and if all you care about is straight line acceleration or bragging rights at Maple Ridge then no this isn't for you.
Old 06-05-2009, 12:45 PM
  #15  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rinty
Does anyone know whether, if you chose to re gear, leaving the stock 2nd gear in, and going with a taller 1st gear, the car would bog a bit, from a standstill?

My issue is with the approximate 1200 rpm split between those two gears.
1st gear is machined into the mainshaft on ALL street gearboxes so you'll buy a new mainshaft to raise that,...

We usually leave 1st gear alone unless the vehicle is a full-blown race car where a "full-active" 6-speed is desirable. That permits the use of 1st gear on each lap in slow corners but not a good idea for anything driven on the street.

The proper way to reduce the RPM split between 1st & 2nd is by changing second gear.


Quick Reply: The pro's and con's of regearing



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:13 PM.