Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bang for the buck?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2008, 01:25 PM
  #1  
dcdude
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
dcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Bay, Los Angeles
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Bang for the buck?

A little OT, but here goes:

Which air-cooled 911 would be the cheapest to buy, quickest, have the lowest cost of ownership and might be well-suited as a DE or track car?

It seems like the post '73 cars are much less collectible than other 911s and owners feel more comfortable "bastardizing" them with later model engines. I've seen a few mid-70s units that had their (leaky? magnesium? 3.0?) engines replaced with 3.2s. Can the mid '70 models be that much lighter? Would a 3.2 be "so much quicker" than the stock engine or would a 3.6 be more "worth it"? Or does the 3.2 have a durablility advantage? There must be some "magic" combination.
Old 05-12-2008, 01:26 PM
  #2  
bart1
Race Car
 
bart1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alabama
Posts: 3,599
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

My mechanic recommended the '86-89 Carrera 3.2.
Old 05-12-2008, 01:50 PM
  #3  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

There is no air-cooled 911 that meets your requirements. The one that I can think of is a Boxster S.

Every model has its flaws -- 2.7's have awful engines, 3.0's need the head studs replaced, 3.2's are heavy, under-braked, and have valve guide problems, etc. And all these cars, to be useful on the track for anyone other than the most novice of novices, needs suspension, braking, and engine cooling mods. Not to mention, being very old cars, a lot of maintenance to keep healthy. You want an out-of-the-box, low-priced, super-fun street/track car? Boxster S.
Old 05-12-2008, 01:53 PM
  #4  
Mike in Chi

Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mike in Chi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: The Flying Turtle Ranch
Posts: 12,321
Received 176 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

944S2. Great handling and if set up right, bulletproof. Quick, and if cost is a factor it quickly makes you forget the extra two cylinders.
Old 05-12-2008, 03:51 PM
  #5  
matt777
Drifting
 
matt777's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 2,817
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Those last 2 aren't air-cooled but I do agree with Noah in that the Boxsters have to be a great bang for the buck considering that their price, availability and modern suspension.
Old 05-12-2008, 04:09 PM
  #6  
Kika
Nordschleife Master
 
Kika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Torrance, CA USA
Posts: 5,632
Received 80 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

G-50 3.2 is best bang for the buck that meets your criteria.
Old 05-12-2008, 04:36 PM
  #7  
1pcarnut
Drifting
 
1pcarnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Sandy Eggo, Ca
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My vote is for a 964. I think you can have the classic 911 lines but modern gear box and nice amenities in this model for a very reasonable price. And yes, I know they have some issues just like most Pcars. Just learn what they are and buy accordinly.
Old 05-12-2008, 05:05 PM
  #8  
ninjabones
Rennlist Member
 
ninjabones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Philly suburbs
Posts: 1,865
Received 38 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Noah
There is no air-cooled 911 that meets your requirements. The one that I can think of is a Boxster S.

Every model has its flaws -- 2.7's have awful engines, 3.0's need the head studs replaced, 3.2's are heavy, under-braked, and have valve guide problems, etc. And all these cars, to be useful on the track for anyone other than the most novice of novices, needs suspension, braking, and engine cooling mods. Not to mention, being very old cars, a lot of maintenance to keep healthy. You want an out-of-the-box, low-priced, super-fun street/track car? Boxster S.

This logic is very reasonable. I started with a 2001 Boxster S... great car, handled beautifully, well-balanced, reliable..... however, I sold it for my 1st (of two) 993s. Just not the same beast (but based on your objective criteria, it would be a wise choice)
Old 05-12-2008, 05:44 PM
  #9  
dcdude
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
dcdude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South Bay, Los Angeles
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well, if we're talking waterpumpers, I think a '99 996 for $28K might offer more bang for the buck than a $15K Boxster 2.5. But that's a different can of worms.

I'm talking about a retro-sleeper outlaw air-cooled 911. Sorta like the strange builds you see in Excellence, but not for $75K. More like a 912 in which someone else already put a 3.2 and added the cage, brakes and all the track bits. No ammenities needed. If it was titled as a '71, for example, you could remove much of the smog equipment, right?
Old 05-12-2008, 06:03 PM
  #10  
NP993
Rennlist Member
 
NP993's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 3,052
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Well, if you're looking for a track car, then yes, there are plenty of good deals around. If you have $28K to spend, you can get a nice 911SC or 3.2 Carrera that has had a lot of track-prep money dumped into it. Start browsing the classifieds.

But since you're looking for a highly-modified car, I don't understand why you're looking for a category of 911 to buy. By definition, you're going to be shopping for one-off examples.
Old 05-12-2008, 06:34 PM
  #11  
TMc993
Rennlist Member
 
TMc993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Dahlonega, Georgia
Posts: 3,584
Received 550 Likes on 347 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dcdude68
I'm talking about a retro-sleeper outlaw air-cooled 911. Sorta like the strange builds you see in Excellence, but not for $75K. More like a 912 in which someone else already put a 3.2 and added the cage, brakes and all the track bits. No ammenities needed.
While not an expert, I've been involved at a distance in a few of these type of projects and have owned one.

Here's what I learned:

There's plenty of bastardized iron out there and buying a completed car is more economical than building one.

Check around the indy shops, DEs, PCA events, SCCA events, track days and club publications. Many have bulletin boards/classifieds where customers can post cars for sale and you can often find one of those "$45K invested but will sell for $20K" deals. Just keep in mind that the $45K invested part usually includes the owner's labor valued at $300/hour.

A good indy technician can advise you on a quality outlaw build versus a piece of crap and most of the PPI rules would apply to the mechanicals. Above all, make sure the safety items are up to par.

Expect to have problems...Intermingling components across model years is never as clean as it sounds and homemade design is rarely as durable/reliable as factory design, especially if high performance is involved.

Expect to lose money when you get ready to get rid of it.

Have fun...Don't make it such a task that it becomes work.

Good luck,
Terry
Old 05-12-2008, 06:37 PM
  #12  
mrsullivan
Nordschleife Master
 
mrsullivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,621
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Funny, you sound like me 3 months ago. I was in love with the early 70s hot rods, the 87-89 cars, and of course our 993s. In the end, I decided that (again) the 993 was the best combination of old-school feel, seat of pants feel, smells, price, etc. I came REALLY close to buying a couple well done early hot rods, but in the end worried about resale value. Those cars are fun, but not original...and the well done examples are $60k+ easy.



Quick Reply: Bang for the buck?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:31 AM.