Clutch vent removal ?
#1
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Clutch vent removal ?
On the PCA tech forums in december, Joel Reiser recommended to disconnect the clutch vent.
The main reason for this is that the vent brings dirty clutch particles right into the air filter. Doesn't help to keep it clean !
Other potential advantages :
I think it would make it easier to change the spark plugs if the tube goes away.
It would save some weight.
The depression under the car (at speed) would suck the particles away, so do we really need this thing being connected to the air filter ?
The race cars don't have that vent.
So it sounds like a pretty good idea to do it, and let that vent join the engine tray in the attic. Has anyone done it ? Is there any good way to do it ?
Or is it a bad idea ?
-Guillaume
The main reason for this is that the vent brings dirty clutch particles right into the air filter. Doesn't help to keep it clean !
Other potential advantages :
I think it would make it easier to change the spark plugs if the tube goes away.
It would save some weight.
The depression under the car (at speed) would suck the particles away, so do we really need this thing being connected to the air filter ?
The race cars don't have that vent.
So it sounds like a pretty good idea to do it, and let that vent join the engine tray in the attic. Has anyone done it ? Is there any good way to do it ?
Or is it a bad idea ?
-Guillaume
#2
I did it a long time ago (approximate 30K miles). No problems whatsoever.
To clean things up further, I actually replaced the engine tin with a solid piece (no hole) from a tiptronic car.
Frankly, I see no need to "pollute" my intake tract.
To clean things up further, I actually replaced the engine tin with a solid piece (no hole) from a tiptronic car.
Frankly, I see no need to "pollute" my intake tract.
#3
Interesting. Since it is an OEM design, there has to be some reason WHY the factory designed it that way?
#4
Rennlist Member
I removed the tube as well; however, a short (~6") angled tube was attached at the bell housing to keep debris from finding its way into the clutch - and to blast the black clutch dust to atmosphere ( along with my brake dust ). Also, a sheet metal plate was easily cut out and screwed to the engine tin via the tube mounting holes.
#5
Rennlist Member
1) didn't want to get the engine tray dirty with clutch dust ..
2) pilot dust collection system for base models - the planned enviro "Green" option was to duct in 4 more tubes from the brake calipers ..
3) to give a "visual" indicator of when to change the air filter - as they otherwise rarely look dirty at the recommended change interval ...
4) ___________ ....
#6
Seared
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#7
Drifting
Original design might have been part of the Porsche 'green' effort as it relates to car design vis-a-vis noise and air pollution. The 993 was to represent a nirvana of low noise and atmosperic pollution. Since, for some reason, the tranny needed to be vented, they chose to vent it a-la a PCV system, in effect, making it a closed system. By removing the vent tube, the system is now open to the atmosphere and contributing to yukky pollution and perhaps contamination of the tranny. Not sure what performance enhancement is to be gained from this proposed mod. The vent tube only weighs a few ounces and the plug changing ritual is not such a frequently occuring ritual on a street-only car to justify the mod in my mind. This is strictly a 02Cts worth input.
BTW: AFter I changed all my plugs a couple months ago, I could not get the flexible vent hose reconnected to the rigid pipe because the hose was pretty beat up and I really need three hands to do it, so in effect I am polluting
BTW: AFter I changed all my plugs a couple months ago, I could not get the flexible vent hose reconnected to the rigid pipe because the hose was pretty beat up and I really need three hands to do it, so in effect I am polluting
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
I took it off both of my 993s, as I want all the "clean" air I can get going into the filter and engine. BTW, there was no increase in dust/dirt in the engine compartment.
#9
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The rest (if any) is just bonus.
#10
Drifting
#11
Instructor
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I removed the tube as well; however, a short (~6") angled tube was attached at the bell housing to keep debris from finding its way into the clutch - and to blast the black clutch dust to atmosphere ( along with my brake dust ). Also, a sheet metal plate was easily cut out and screwed to the engine tin via the tube mounting holes.
Do you have pictures of that tube ? Where did you source it ?
#12
Rennlist Member
Sorry - no pics taken: quite simple really, just hacksawed a piece from the old tube and attached it as a rearward mounted down spout. The tinwork cover was zipped from a piece of sheet with tinsnips.
#13
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
Why bother, if you leave it off then you have more opening for air to enter just like the Fabspeed air box now!
#14
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
Lifetime Member
#15
Rennlist Member