Laser Diffuser
#2
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
No lawyer here but laser, unlike radar is not regulated by the FCC so in theory it is not "illegal" to use a diffuser / jammer. You could possibly get an interfering with a police investigation or some other charge if the violation was flagrant. Good Luck.
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
From various radar detector testing consumer testing sites:
" it is still perfectly legal to jam lasers except in Minnesota, California, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Utah, Virginia and Washington D.C., where they have been banned or restricted. "
Do a little more Google or equivalent search and I'm sure you'll find out how severe California penalty is.
" it is still perfectly legal to jam lasers except in Minnesota, California, Oklahoma, Nebraska, Utah, Virginia and Washington D.C., where they have been banned or restricted. "
Do a little more Google or equivalent search and I'm sure you'll find out how severe California penalty is.
#6
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
CA Vehicle code 28150:
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc28150.htm
"Jamming: Electronic Speed-Measuring Devices
28150. (a) No vehicle shall be equipped with any device that is designed for, or is capable of, jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(b) No person shall use, buy, possess, manufacture, sell, or otherwise distribute any device that is designed for jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(c) Except as provided in subdivision (d), a violation of subdivision (a) or (b) is an infraction.
(d) When a person possesses four or more devices in violation of subdivision (b), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who has a valid federal license for operating the devices described in this section may transport one or more of those devices if the license is carried in the vehicle transporting the device at all times when the device is being transported.
Added Sec. 1, Ch. 493, Stats. 1998. Effective January 1, 1999."
http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d12/vc28150.htm
"Jamming: Electronic Speed-Measuring Devices
28150. (a) No vehicle shall be equipped with any device that is designed for, or is capable of, jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(b) No person shall use, buy, possess, manufacture, sell, or otherwise distribute any device that is designed for jamming, scrambling, neutralizing, disabling, or otherwise interfering with radar, laser, or any other electronic device used by a law enforcement agency to measure the speed of moving objects.
(c) Except as provided in subdivision (d), a violation of subdivision (a) or (b) is an infraction.
(d) When a person possesses four or more devices in violation of subdivision (b), the person is guilty of a misdemeanor.
(e) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a person who has a valid federal license for operating the devices described in this section may transport one or more of those devices if the license is carried in the vehicle transporting the device at all times when the device is being transported.
Added Sec. 1, Ch. 493, Stats. 1998. Effective January 1, 1999."
#7
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So what is a guy to do going on a road trip to California with one of these built in?
"Yes, officer, a nice person online told me it was illegal, but... Yes, I know the law, but... No, it's not a new car - it's a '97... This is 'Ocean Blue' - yes it's my favorite color, too... Thanks officer, if you're ever in Seattle..."
"Yes, officer, a nice person online told me it was illegal, but... Yes, I know the law, but... No, it's not a new car - it's a '97... This is 'Ocean Blue' - yes it's my favorite color, too... Thanks officer, if you're ever in Seattle..."
![bigbye](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/xyxwave.gif)
Trending Topics
#8
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Feign ignorance, be apologetic and humble..... After all, if you live in a state with different rules... how could you you be expected to know the intimacies of CA's laws?
"I'm so sorry officer, I had no idea that CA had such a law....."
"I'm so sorry officer, I had no idea that CA had such a law....."
#10
![Unhappy](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon9.gif)
Originally Posted by grmnxtc
Feign ignorance, be apologetic and humble..... After all, if you live in a state with different rules... how could you you be expected to know the intimacies of CA's laws?
"I'm so sorry officer, I had no idea that CA had such a law....."
"I'm so sorry officer, I had no idea that CA had such a law....."
#11
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Beezr
So what is a guy to do going on a road trip to California with one of these built in?
"Yes, officer, a nice person online told me it was illegal, but... Yes, I know the law, but... No, it's not a new car - it's a '97... This is 'Ocean Blue' - yes it's my favorite color, too... Thanks officer, if you're ever in Seattle..."
![bigbye](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/xyxwave.gif)
"Yes, officer, a nice person online told me it was illegal, but... Yes, I know the law, but... No, it's not a new car - it's a '97... This is 'Ocean Blue' - yes it's my favorite color, too... Thanks officer, if you're ever in Seattle..."
![bigbye](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/xyxwave.gif)
![ducking](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon107.gif)
#12
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
An Ex-California Police Oficer told me that jammers would be considered devices interfering with Police work, which could lead to impounding the car as evidence.
Mean!
Mean!
#13
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Isn't this the reason jammers turn themselves off after they fire. I though they fire a couple of times then stop so the cops can get a speed reading. If the gun keeps getting an error that it is a dead give away something is up.
#14
Drifting
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, PA
Posts: 2,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Nicole
An Ex-California Police Oficer told me that jammers would be considered devices interfering with Police work, which could lead to impounding the car as evidence.
Mean!
Mean!
technically, the brake pedal could be construed the same way. if you are speeding, your radar detector starts going off, and you start braking, you are interfering with "police work" .. aka "revenue collection".