Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:
View Poll Results: Which would you choose?
997 Turbo
9
32.14%
Ruf R-Kompressor
17
60.71%
Neither... I'd be happy with 'just' a C2S
2
7.14%
Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll

997 Turbo vs. Ruf R-Kompressor

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2007, 02:14 PM
  #1  
urban_alchemist
Pro
Thread Starter
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, UK : Tel-Aviv, IL
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default 997 Turbo vs. Ruf R-Kompressor

Just curious as to what the split would be, and why? If you had to choose, which one would you go for and why?

NOTE - The C2S is a 997 NOT a 993!!!
Old 05-13-2007, 03:07 PM
  #2  
Gary996
Instructor
 
Gary996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

RUF R Kompressor

I do not like the looks of the 997 Turbo plus the C2S with the Kompressor is a much better value IMHO.
Old 05-13-2007, 04:54 PM
  #3  
urban_alchemist
Pro
Thread Starter
 
urban_alchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, UK : Tel-Aviv, IL
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

I ask, cos I have the price-list from RUF of all their 997-based cars, and had some time to spare (ok, I was bored on a sunday).

Specced a 997 Turbo and an R Kompressor (RUF Vin) to identical specs, and was surprised that whereas the Turbo was £108K, the RUF was £111K (after a frankly extortionate €15K for right-hand-drive). Both hideously expensive by any means, but very different and, by price, directly comparable alternatives...

So, the way I see it, the RUF has the exclusivity and the Supercharger power-delivery, whereas the Turbo has the pure numbers and edge on power...

With that in mind, what would you choose?
Old 05-13-2007, 05:19 PM
  #4  
ZAMIRZ
Three Wheelin'
 
ZAMIRZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: L.A.
Posts: 1,543
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would spring for the turbo. The looks can be fixed, especially with the addition of RUF parts. I understand that the R Kompressor is saddled with the same engine as the NA 996 and 997. A great motor in its own right, but not comparable to what the 997TT and 911-based GT cars recieve, that in itself would be enough to sway me toward the turbo.

I haven't been able to experience the R-Kompressor's power delivery, but with the VTG turbos and all the other great technologies (Variocam+, etc.) that the 997TT comes with, lag in the traditional sense is nearly non-existent.

The only way an R-Kompressor makes sense IMHO is if you already own a 997 and want to do the conversion.

Either way, you can't go wrong, and they're both fantastic cars.
Old 05-13-2007, 06:18 PM
  #5  
Ed Burdell
Rennlist Member
 
Ed Burdell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Marietta, Ga
Posts: 4,920
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Oops, I voted for the C2S before I read it was a 997, not a 993...please disregard my vote.
Old 05-16-2007, 12:44 AM
  #6  
f8vr993
Rennlist Member
 
f8vr993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Orange County
Posts: 1,147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

997 Turbo is UGLY! With that kind of $$$, I'll rather get myself GT3!



Quick Reply: 997 Turbo vs. Ruf R-Kompressor



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:13 AM.