Tires for 98 C2S
#16
Pro
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Tim
We now own the same car.I just purchased a beautiful Artic Silver 98 C2S in Florida.You are close in Los Altos.I would like to hook up after I get my car.It was picked up today.Do they make Ps2 in the size you mentioned for the front?Will the diamters be correct for the Front and Rear?Let me know how they work out for you,Ride Quality,Noise,handeling.how much taller is the 295/18 to the 285/18?
We now own the same car.I just purchased a beautiful Artic Silver 98 C2S in Florida.You are close in Los Altos.I would like to hook up after I get my car.It was picked up today.Do they make Ps2 in the size you mentioned for the front?Will the diamters be correct for the Front and Rear?Let me know how they work out for you,Ride Quality,Noise,handeling.how much taller is the 295/18 to the 285/18?
#18
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by eichlerman
...Why are there more options for C2S vs. C4S? Don't they have the same fender dimensions? Doesn't wheel & offset determine what tires fit? I have 315s on my C4S.
Does anyone know what is the maximum width you can run up front (I have 245 and there seems to be plenty of room left)? 255? 265?
#19
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jukelemon
...For the Porsche, I run their NT555 series with 285/35 and 225/40 specs....
#20
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
First time posting a picture so I hope this works. We had a break in the weather yesterday so I finally got my new tires and wheels mounted on the car.
No fitment issue with the 295/30 on the rear. In fact plenty of room even with the ROW set up (done by Viper Bob). Same is true for the 235/40 up front.
Ride quality seems fine with only minor change from the 17" wheels and tires. The front of the car seems much more stable at turn in with the larger tires which is refreshing. Rosd noise is an improvement however my rear tires were shot so it is really an apple to orange comparison.
I did weigh the rear tires before installing as that question always seems to com up here. Looks like the 18"/PS2 set up is about 8-9 lbs heavier than the 17"/P-Zero set up on the back. I did not do the front - forgot.
mpgandco - Yes twins! Coffee or lunch sometime would be great or you should look out for a BAR drive.
No fitment issue with the 295/30 on the rear. In fact plenty of room even with the ROW set up (done by Viper Bob). Same is true for the 235/40 up front.
Ride quality seems fine with only minor change from the 17" wheels and tires. The front of the car seems much more stable at turn in with the larger tires which is refreshing. Rosd noise is an improvement however my rear tires were shot so it is really an apple to orange comparison.
I did weigh the rear tires before installing as that question always seems to com up here. Looks like the 18"/PS2 set up is about 8-9 lbs heavier than the 17"/P-Zero set up on the back. I did not do the front - forgot.
mpgandco - Yes twins! Coffee or lunch sometime would be great or you should look out for a BAR drive.
#26
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Jukelemon
Don't follow.
What do you mean?
What do you mean?
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#27
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Los Altos, CA
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Don't know about 18x11 but as shown in the picture I am running 235/40 on the front and 295/30 in the rear on stock Technology (Hollow) rims and ROW M030 with no issue.
Hope that helps.
Hope that helps.
#28
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Father of 3
I think what he is saying is that because of 4wd, there is a maximum wheel circumference differential that can exist or else the computer sensors that shift torque between the front and rear will be affected. Either that or he thinks it will just look weird ![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Junkelman - Fo3 is correct...for 4WD 993s the ratio of the rolling circumferences (and hence diameters) between the front and rear wheels are not supposed to be different by more than 4%. There are a few threads on this topic that go into the issues in greater detail...I do not have any personal experiences w/4WD 993s (both of mine are 2WD) and so am OK w/running "weird looking" combos (
![Big Grin](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
![burnout](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/burnout.gif)
#29
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I ran a mismatched set one on my 993...a set of 205s on the front, 255s on the back...I must have gotten them cheap. The rolling radius differential was excessive, by X%, and it shut off my ABS...not cool. I immediately changed tires to factory specs...and the problem went away...of course I flat spotted the fronts..they were junk.
<<<Advice for me...
![manual](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/rtfm.gif)
#30
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Folks,
I recently bought a set of wheels (8X18 & 11X18) I cant fit stock size tires at the rear wheels anymore (11 instead of 10...) so I have to go to 295/30-18 instead of 285/30-18.
I was going to keep the front size stock (225/40-18) but when I read this thread, I realized that I should also enlarge the front tires as well to avoid issues with my AWD system.
I then downloaded the Excel spreadsheet made my 993 Pilot (Thanks, great tool) to verify my toughts...
I'm a little confused now. The "Actual Front/Rear Rolling Circumference Difference " is less with the original 225/40-18 than with a 235/40-18 when I use a 295/30-18 at the rear...
Some guru can explain me why? ...and what front tire size should I put on my car if I have 295 at the rear...
Hope it also helps the other AWD guys here...
Pierre
I recently bought a set of wheels (8X18 & 11X18) I cant fit stock size tires at the rear wheels anymore (11 instead of 10...) so I have to go to 295/30-18 instead of 285/30-18.
I was going to keep the front size stock (225/40-18) but when I read this thread, I realized that I should also enlarge the front tires as well to avoid issues with my AWD system.
I then downloaded the Excel spreadsheet made my 993 Pilot (Thanks, great tool) to verify my toughts...
I'm a little confused now. The "Actual Front/Rear Rolling Circumference Difference " is less with the original 225/40-18 than with a 235/40-18 when I use a 295/30-18 at the rear...
Some guru can explain me why? ...and what front tire size should I put on my car if I have 295 at the rear...
Hope it also helps the other AWD guys here...
Pierre