Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: DashLynx

Failed SAI flush. No longer impressed, or amused with Porsche.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-12-2007, 01:42 PM
  #31  
98993c2s
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
98993c2s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Either a physical port bypass (there was a thread about that recently) or a device to fool the computer...
Old 01-12-2007, 01:43 PM
  #32  
smddanny
Instructor
 
smddanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I understand the SAI problem but was surprised to see the DIY a few days ago detail how the port ran thru the cam carrier and head to outlet behind the exhaust port.

I seem to remember my 930 had air injection and a pump that routed air to the exhaust manifold. Seems like life was easier then, there were no internal passages. I actually can't see what is wrong with that set up either.

From what I have seen it is a common practice for the auto manufacturers and ecu producers to engage the air pump when the motor is cold between x and y temps and then look to the oxygen sensors for a change in the a/f ratio. Realizing that the factory has many well qualified engineers to run solutions and prove them and that is why the cars work well from the factory.. they are not beyond reproach (remember how many versions there are of the cooling blower fan!) and why not install a couple or air ports upstream of the cats, let the oxygen go in and tickle the lambdas and forget about the ports in the head that look like misery to clean out. If I ever have this issue with my 993 T, I would like to weld on ports near the 3-1 exhaust junction and insert the air, it looks like a lot less work and can anyone tell me for a fact that this scheme will not work.

Perhaps the combined wisdom of the rennlist can produce such a "kit" with a pair of capillaries and ports etc. Seems like life could be simpler .. no???

Danny Shapiro
993 TT '96 with 35K miles pulls and runs like a freight train on rails and loving my new hds and eibach..even though the dealer soaked me for an alignment... now I remember why I haven't bought services there for 25 years...
Old 01-12-2007, 01:44 PM
  #33  
Traffic53
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
Traffic53's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Illinois
Posts: 986
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

my car uses quite a bit of oil, actually. i estimate going through 1 quart every 750 miles. however, i believe porsche considers this acceptable. it is on the low end, for sure. any LESS than that is definately no good.
Old 01-12-2007, 01:59 PM
  #34  
trojanman
Three Wheelin'
 
trojanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Orange County, So Cal
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic53
my car uses quite a bit of oil, actually. i estimate going through 1 quart every 750 miles. however, i believe porsche considers this acceptable. it is on the low end, for sure. any LESS than that is definately no good.
Hey Mike...

Sorry to hear of your problems. As painful as it likely sounds, with your stated oil consumption it seems like your shop only tried to address the symptom rather than dealing with the cause (worn guides). I've heard horror stories about clogged ports and the inability to get them unplugged, and ultimately the only sure-fire solution is ream them while the engine is apart.

Maybe your shop would credit you all of their labor for the flush and let you put it towards a top end rebuild? Sounds like an inevitability at some point in the near future anyway.

As others have stated, I went through the "rage phase" with my car but came out the other end (the new top end!) really loving her... you can't know the peace of mind that comes from biting the bullet and getting it done until you experience it.

Probably not the greatest solution in your mind at this point, but just my $.02.

Good luck.
Old 01-12-2007, 02:05 PM
  #35  
vjd3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
vjd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,087
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I may or may not do the top end on my new 97 ... and if I do, I will probably reroute the air to the exhaust. I'll make sure and have some photos of it to post.
Old 01-12-2007, 05:51 PM
  #36  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 98993c2s
eliminating the CEL and OBDII codes so the cars can pass emissions,
The problem with a company creating a product or your mechanic installing a workaround is that the EPA enforcement division will send them a letter that says, "Section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act states, that for any person to remove or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under this title prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser, or for any person knowingly to remove or render inoperative any such device or element of design after such sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser is prohibited." And if you don't comply they will close your business down.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:24 PM
  #37  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,715
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 98993c2s
Either a physical port bypass (there was a thread about that recently) or a device to fool the computer...

I agree 100%.

By the way, this problem is not limited to Porsche. BMW has the same issue with its M5.

However, my understanding is that, at least for Porsche, the O2 sensor detects the drop in oxygen level when the air is not injected through the ports into the exhaust stream, so why not just add a bypass just upstream of the sensor and divert some additional air there. I don't have the problem with my 96 (knock on wood) but that is the exact path I will pursue before I even think about opening the engine to unplug some useless holes.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:49 PM
  #38  
vjd3
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
vjd3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,087
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I read through the Massachusetts emissions laws; it specifically states that "temporary repairs" to the system to improve its performance are okay as long as they are not messing with the OBD2 computer system or sensors. I would interpret that as saying it's okay to "re-engineer" the system as long as it's doing what it's supposed to do ... i.e., getting more oxygen to the cats to heat them quicker, which is what my understanding of the SAI system is. I would think that would not be illegal; putting a circuit board to fool the OBD2 system about the condition of the oxygen sensor would be.
Old 01-12-2007, 06:58 PM
  #39  
dbf73
Boost Junkie
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
dbf73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Plymouth MN and Scottsdale AZ
Posts: 2,526
Received 38 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
The problem with a company creating a product or your mechanic installing a workaround is that the EPA enforcement division will send them a letter that says, "Section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act states, that for any person to remove or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under this title prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser, or for any person knowingly to remove or render inoperative any such device or element of design after such sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser is prohibited." And if you don't comply they will close your business down.
hence the ever-popular "for use in off road vehicles only:
Old 01-12-2007, 07:09 PM
  #40  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,715
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vjd3
I read through the Massachusetts emissions laws; it specifically states that "temporary repairs" to the system to improve its performance are okay as long as they are not messing with the OBD2 computer system or sensors. I would interpret that as saying it's okay to "re-engineer" the system as long as it's doing what it's supposed to do ... i.e., getting more oxygen to the cats to heat them quicker, which is what my understanding of the SAI system is. I would think that would not be illegal; putting a circuit board to fool the OBD2 system about the condition of the oxygen sensor would be.
Good research. I would agree with you that changing the circuit board would fall into the category of a modification. However, a bypass, strictly speaking doesn't touch either the sensor or the circuit board. I would also define the bypass as temporary. It's just there until I open the engine at 200k miles for a real repair; oh say in 20 years. Besides, I seriously doubt a 1/4" or 1/2" tube would be noticable if done neatly and professionally.
Old 01-12-2007, 07:15 PM
  #41  
Slow Guy
Race Director
 
Slow Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 10,272
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Traffic53
my car uses quite a bit of oil, actually. i estimate going through 1 quart every 750 miles. however, i believe porsche considers this acceptable. it is on the low end, for sure. any LESS than that is definately no good.
Actually, I think the "official" figure is 1L per 1000 km so you're not too far above their limit.

Converts to apx. 1qt per 625 mi.
Old 01-12-2007, 07:20 PM
  #42  
Leland Pate
Burning Brakes
 
Leland Pate's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

...or you could just save yourself a lot of hassle and buy a '95.

I kid you not, these CEL threads have kept me from looking at a widebody.
Old 01-12-2007, 07:39 PM
  #43  
DC from Cape Cod
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
DC from Cape Cod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 3,727
Likes: 0
Received 51 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

I could strap a Flux Capacitor to my engine and it would pass a visual check here on Cape Cod. I have no idea what kind of people you have inspecting your cars where you live but around here they all hate "The Man".
Old 01-12-2007, 08:23 PM
  #44  
pedsurg
Three Wheelin'
 
pedsurg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interesting to hear about the lack of problems with the Euro cars. Adrian recently sent out a lengthy missive on the e-mail list on this topic and one thing he mentioned was the difference between US il and Euro oil.
Adrian; would you care to elaborate??

Jack
Old 01-12-2007, 09:07 PM
  #45  
98993c2s
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
98993c2s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Austin
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There are plenty of companies that produce such products and I haven't heard of any of them being shut down. 02 simulators, cat bypasses, etc.

And the way this is worded, I don't see anything that prevents a company from producing such a product; technically, the wording only applies to 'a person' who does the work on the car.

Originally Posted by JasonAndreas
The problem with a company creating a product or your mechanic installing a workaround is that the EPA enforcement division will send them a letter that says, "Section 203(a)(3)(A) of the Clean Air Act states, that for any person to remove or render inoperative any device or element of design installed on or in a motor vehicle or motor vehicle engine in compliance with regulations under this title prior to its sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser, or for any person knowingly to remove or render inoperative any such device or element of design after such sale and delivery to the ultimate purchaser is prohibited." And if you don't comply they will close your business down.


Quick Reply: Failed SAI flush. No longer impressed, or amused with Porsche.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:37 AM.