Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Which car would you prefer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-30-2006, 10:09 PM
  #1  
AnthemAVM
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AnthemAVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Which car would you prefer?

I am getting back in and narrowing down on 993 to buy.

I currently have the following two options.

1995 with about 38K miles, nice suspension upgrades, clean, doesn't have full service records.

1996 with 66K miles, Clutch/Flywheel and Full Valve Job, nice suspension upgrade, full service records.

Thanks for your input.
Old 09-30-2006, 10:15 PM
  #2  
obchuck
Racer
 
obchuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How about some price info???
Old 09-30-2006, 10:40 PM
  #3  
AnthemAVM
Racer
Thread Starter
 
AnthemAVM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Orange County
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They are currently both at the same price and condition
Old 09-30-2006, 10:53 PM
  #4  
RyanPerrella
Nordschleife Master
 
RyanPerrella's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Posts: 8,929
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

i would go with the 1996 Vraw with recent engine work
Old 09-30-2006, 11:03 PM
  #5  
nota_troll
Rennlist Member
 
nota_troll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,113
Received 7 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

96
Old 09-30-2006, 11:07 PM
  #6  
AM993
Rennlist Member
 
AM993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Ontario (Canada)
Posts: 1,638
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would go with the 95: lower mileage + no OBDII. Of course, I am biased...
Old 09-30-2006, 11:40 PM
  #7  
H20NOO
Rennlist Member
 
H20NOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No question, the 1996. As Bruce Anderson, among the most respected Porsche mechanics and freelance writers on the planet says, "always buy the newest 911 you can afford". The 96 has Varioram (12% more torque down low) and 1 year less time on all components, not to mention better resale value. The mileage on both is really of no consequence if you are going to own and drive the car for at least 2-3 years. A 993 with less than 100k miles is generally a very reliable ride and most that are well maintained can go 150k or further (much in some cases) without an overhaul.

The 1996 is your better buy.

MC
Old 10-01-2006, 12:12 AM
  #8  
rcwelch
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
rcwelch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redmond,Washington
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd go with the 95 as there are no "check engine" issues associated with the 96 and up OBDII 993's.
Old 10-01-2006, 12:21 AM
  #9  
Topless in Temecula
Racer
 
Topless in Temecula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Agree Bruce NAderson would usually recommend nesest one you can afford. I choose '95 because no OBDII - SAI problems. Pick up this months Excellence magazine - great article on buying a 993.

Peter
Old 10-01-2006, 12:22 AM
  #10  
Topless in Temecula
Racer
 
Topless in Temecula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Excuse me - my fingers can't spell!
Old 10-01-2006, 12:47 AM
  #11  
FisterD
Rennlist Member
 
FisterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 4,257
Received 43 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Either one would be fine. Drive them both, and see which one drives and feels better to you.
Old 10-01-2006, 01:04 AM
  #12  
Pedro356C
Drifting
 
Pedro356C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Surfside - FL
Posts: 2,330
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by H20NOO
As Bruce Anderson, among the most respected Porsche mechanics and freelance writers on the planet says, "always buy the newest 911 you can afford". MC
I'd never trade my 1995 993 for a 1999 996 although they are both 911s and the 996 is newer...
Old 10-01-2006, 03:51 AM
  #13  
BrokenE
Instructor
 
BrokenE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Actually, I wrote to Bruce Anderson to ask his recommendations. I was trying to narrow my search for a 911 to one of the following: 96-97 993 vs 93-94 964 vs 87-89 Carrera. I explained I wanted the car for a DD. I thought the 96-later 993 woul be more desirable because of the varioram and additional torque, etc. ..... Yes, he did recommend the newest, the 993. But he recommended a 95 993 because it does not have the secondary air pump and does not have the OBD2.

Maybe some of the 96-later 993 owners can comment on how serious this problem is.

Otherwise, no matter what car you buy, the most common peice of advise is to make sure you get a Pre Purchase Inspection done. Just because someone tells you a top end rebuild was done, unless you know the shop that did it, you are not going to know the quality of workmanship/parts that was put in. This is why you do the PPI no matter what. Good luck.
Old 10-01-2006, 04:40 AM
  #14  
c993k
Rennlist Member
 
c993k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: South Florida
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I would go with the one that you like the most after a test drive. Chris
Old 10-01-2006, 08:59 AM
  #15  
Jeff
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jeff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Michigan
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd go with the 95' -- no CEL issues is imprtant enough to sway me everytime.


Quick Reply: Which car would you prefer?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:27 PM.