Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Why I think removing engine tray is no good....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-11-2006, 04:11 PM
  #16  
Porscheologist
Racer
 
Porscheologist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 280
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The way I see it is that if Bruce Anderson says to remove them, I listen. While you may not see a substantial difference every little bit helps. Heat is the enemy of the aircooled engine. My SC did not have it so why should my 993? Also, unlike the transmission tray I do not recall seeing any scoops to help ram cool air into the engine. They essentially serve no purpose other than a sound barrier. If you do not believe this then maybe you can explain what they are there for?????????
Old 04-11-2006, 04:18 PM
  #17  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porscheologist
If you do not believe this then maybe you can explain what they are there for
The two primary purposes as designed were to improve underbody aerodynamics and for the directed cooling of the engine and transmission. That is the only official engineering data I've ever seen, the designer (Michael Preiss) still works at PAG so theoretically we should be able to confirm that the swiss noise regulations reasoning is an old wives tale that originated in Panorama (I have the issue). Obviously the engineers at PAG would have taken noise abatement into consideration but if the swiss noise regulations were the only or primary reason for the undertray than PAG would have limited the part to Switzerland like they did with certain exhaust parts, the added costs are too high. They also probably would have used a different material.

Originally Posted by Porscheologist
The way I see it is that if Bruce Anderson says to remove them, I listen
same here...

Originally Posted by tj90
Adding thermocouples to the heads as was suggested would be very interesting - that is something that I can do at my next track event and daily driving...
Old 04-11-2006, 04:25 PM
  #18  
ceboyd
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
ceboyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Mount Prospect, IL
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

wow.. nice heat photo!
Old 04-11-2006, 04:49 PM
  #19  
ZombiePorsche44
Drifting
 
ZombiePorsche44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 2,031
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Keep in mind my car has never seen a track day or auto-x and is my daily driver here in So Cal traffic.

I drove my car with the tray from August to December then had Mark @ Black Forest (no affil) remove it in January......I now see engine temps of approx 200 deg when with the tray, I saw approx 210-215 deg. That may not seem like a lot, but I'll take whatever reduction I can get without the expense or hassle of plumbing in another cooler.

And before anyone points out it's winter, I'd remind you that I live in San Diego, Ca where 50 degrees at night is cold.

I also believe that with the tray removed your lower valves will not heat soak as bad upon shut down due to the heat being trapped between the tray and headers/heat exchangers.
.
Ever see gears melt in a tranny on the street? I never have, but I've seen and had mine do so when my tranny cooler pump failed in The POC Enduro in 98'.
You cannot compare any temps when track driving with normal street use as track temps in the engine and tranny far exceed any normal street driving.

ZP44
Old 04-11-2006, 05:13 PM
  #20  
Bull
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Bull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 12,346
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Somebody needs to tell the Factory Techs that the Swiss noise regs cause for the under engine tray is a "wives tale". I have personally been told that by Factory Techs while in the US doing training. I suspect that is the same place that Bruce Anderson and the Tech Committee rep who was quoted in Panorama received their information.

Take it off, lower the engine temps, and reduce the incidence of leaking valve cover gaskets.
Old 04-11-2006, 05:18 PM
  #21  
luv2ride
Site Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
luv2ride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Connecticut's Gold Coast
Posts: 413
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That may not seem like a lot, but I'll take whatever reduction I can get without the expense or hassle of plumbing in another cooler
Is an oil cooler actually necessary? with a few de's a year and some around town driving in the north east would it make a difference in engine life? If so than what would be the difference? Mileage...examples... Any one?

Ryan
Old 04-11-2006, 05:41 PM
  #22  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by luv2ride
Is an oil cooler actually necessary? with a few de's a year and some around town driving in the north east would it make a difference in engine life? If so than what would be the difference? Mileage...examples... Any one?

Ryan
Good question - maybe for around town driving maybe not necessary. You already have 12 quarts of oil circulating in an air cooler. The fact that I have 12 spark plugs, 2 oil filters and 8 brake lines tells me that Porsche designed these cars to be bulletproof. I believe Porsche would have put a 2nd cooler in the cars if they felt it was necessary. (Track may be a different story...)

To answer one of the posts above - you dont see air scoops on the tray because it would interfere with the cooling from the fan in front of the alternator. The fan is pushing air forwards and your car is pushing air back. This was the reason why I posted the original question. Porsche could have reversed fan direction, used scoops from below and push air out the rear. But then again, it might interfere with the downforce and airflow on the spoiler.

Wow, I just had a thought - what it all you guys without a tray are killing your spoiler downforce cause now you are picking up airflow from below and pushing it out the rear of the car. The escaping hot air can potentially cause your alternator to fail, increasing the potentials for eddying to occur above the heads, and the warm air is less dense so now your spoiler is not providing sufficient downforce!

I guess you can argue this thing from many different angles and OF COURSE OVERANALYZE this....
Old 04-11-2006, 05:45 PM
  #23  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

[/QUOTE]

Lets take a closer look at that photo. Only one exhaust pipe?

It also looks like there are 2 bright spots under the car. My guess is that its originating from the heat exchanger outlets.

Going back to my original post - Porsche designed the tray to isolate the engine from the heat exchanger gases. Without the tray you are mixing outside air with this exchanger gas. Im wondering if you are increasing temps down below the engine without the tray...
Old 04-11-2006, 05:50 PM
  #24  
Greg Fishman
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Greg Fishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 7,254
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

The car in that picture is a 964.
Old 04-11-2006, 05:53 PM
  #25  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Im not familiar with the 964 - anyone want to comment on why there are 2 hot spots...
Old 04-11-2006, 05:55 PM
  #26  
JasonAndreas
Technical Guru
Rennlist Member

 
JasonAndreas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USVI
Posts: 8,138
Received 112 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tj90
Lets take a closer look at that photo. Only one exhaust pipe?
The image was taken of a 964 which is where the swiss noise regulation idea comes from and the patent I posted. The undertray has two small openings for directing air to the cylinder air deflectors (by the oil crossover tubes), there is also another opening at the very front where it meets the transmission undertray.

Originally Posted by tj90
Porsche designed the tray to isolate the engine from the heat exchanger gases
I'm not sure I understand.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:03 PM
  #27  
Greg Fishman
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Greg Fishman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 7,254
Received 33 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tj90
Im not familiar with the 964 - anyone want to comment on why there are 2 hot spots...
Are you talking about the spots on the ground? The catalytic converter runs the width of the rear bumper and it might be the heat radiating from that, or the heat exchanger vents.

If Steve Weiner (head rennlist tech guru and master Porsche mechanic) says to take off the tray due to excessive engine heat and wear, then that is good enough for me. Add to the fact that not a single 993 or 964 race car made had this panel and it is an easy decision to take the tray off. A race team would gladly trade a few hours of engine life for extra downforce if it was possible.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:03 PM
  #28  
Phil
Phlat Black Guru
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
- Times 2

 
Phil's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Back In RI...............
Posts: 4,484
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by tj90
Im not familiar with the 964 - anyone want to comment on why there are 2 hot spots...
I'm pretty sure the muffler on a 964 is in the rear of the car. I also think, but I may be wrong....that the muffler would emit heat???

So in theory....if the pic was of a 993 you would have 3 spots? cause I am pretty sure a 993 has two mufflers at the rear of the car, and both emit heat, right?

in regards to the engine tray being off, and the aerodynamics....I took my tray off for one purpose only. I was affraid with it on......that at speed...The rear of the car would lift....from the air travleing under the car....and then the rear would flip to where the front was.....without the tray on....the air has nothing to "grab" onto.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:14 PM
  #29  
tj90
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
tj90's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: oceanside, ca
Posts: 1,706
Received 19 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

This is what Im going to do - I will drive my car, temp humidity etc will be logged. I will insure that I drive the same exact course same RPMs as close as I can. I will take my IR gun (accurate +/- 1 C) and measure different locations of the engine. I will do both an idle test as well as driving test with tray on and off. I will post the results/pictures of the test.

The only unforeseen difficultly will be to measure the block under the car with the tray on. I need line of sight for the IR gun to work. Maybe I can drop the tray and quickly - within 15 seconds, measure block temperature.
Old 04-11-2006, 06:40 PM
  #30  
brucec59
Rennlist Member
 
brucec59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

TJ, a couple of reasons you're wrong about the heat tray. 1) My own experience is that I saw an immediate reduction in temps sitting in traffic, where temps are highest, after removing the tray. The engine runs cooler at speed, and I did not noticed any difference in temps there, but I didn't have the car long before I took the tray off to get a feel for temps at speed. 2) You're misunderstanding the airflow. You said that air coming up under the car is pushing up, working against the fan. In fact it's not. The air under the car is flowing past the engine, creating a vacuum that pulls the air down. It's like blowing across a drinking straw and thereby drawing the liquid up the straw.


Quick Reply: Why I think removing engine tray is no good....



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:50 AM.