regearing G50.20
01-12-2006, 04:28 AM
#16
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oceania
Posts: 477
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bill,
compromises have to be made but I think that looks good. Realistic top speed, engine not working too hard ,reasonably close ratios all equals improvement in lap times. Will be most interested to get the lap time improvement and driving impressions.I had one query on the tyre size-- is that number correct-- it looks alittle small to me.Comments about fun factor are spot on.
compromises have to be made but I think that looks good. Realistic top speed, engine not working too hard ,reasonably close ratios all equals improvement in lap times. Will be most interested to get the lap time improvement and driving impressions.I had one query on the tyre size-- is that number correct-- it looks alittle small to me.Comments about fun factor are spot on.
01-12-2006, 06:42 PM
#17
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
I agree, compromises. But I am trying to make the right ones that I can live w/
the last suggestion which I toatally agree w/ was to reduce the splits as you get closer to the top. From my road bicycle experince this makes total sense.
The suggestion I am trying to get a handle on now is to overlay the dyno data on the gear data.
Tires are 265/35 x18 MPSCs on 10" 996 wheels 25.2" or 831revs/mi which works out to a rolling radius of 12.13"
the last suggestion which I toatally agree w/ was to reduce the splits as you get closer to the top. From my road bicycle experince this makes total sense.
The suggestion I am trying to get a handle on now is to overlay the dyno data on the gear data.
Tires are 265/35 x18 MPSCs on 10" 996 wheels 25.2" or 831revs/mi which works out to a rolling radius of 12.13"
