Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

265's on stock 17" rear rims?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-03-2005, 05:32 PM
  #1  
Cannock
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cannock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ca
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question 265's on stock 17" rear rims?

It is time for a new set of rear tires. I currently have 225's on the front and 255/40 on the rear. What I am wondering is can I go with 265/40's for the rear? If I do, do they have the same rolling radius?

Thanks
Old 07-03-2005, 05:34 PM
  #2  
DJF1
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
DJF1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Burlington CANADA
Posts: 7,115
Received 65 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Proly not. the 265 should be taller than the 255. With 225's in the front and 255's in the rear its a good setup for less understeer. My suggestion is to keep it this way.
Old 07-03-2005, 07:23 PM
  #3  
STLPCA
Addict & Guru
Rennlist Member

 
STLPCA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

What Danny said, assuming you care most about balanced handling. However, if you have other priorities, the increase in diameter will only be 0.3" +/- which should not cause any issues (unless maybe if your car is lowered a bunch). The larger rears will result in about a 1.5% F-R diameter difference which is not enough to cause ABS problems. The rake will change slightly & your speedo may be low by 1 mph @ 65. Otherwise, should work fine, albeit w/more understeer than you now have.
Old 07-03-2005, 10:18 PM
  #4  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,337
Received 558 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Well the Carrera RS used 225/40 & 265/35 in 18s of course, but the priciple is the same.

You might want to think about 235/45 & 265/40

you will find that the slr(static loaded radius) and rpm(tire revs/mile) are much better indicators of changed gearing and/or speedo readings. The 265/40 is really not much larger(in general) than a 255/40 ~.1" in this area but there is a lot of variation in actual vs nominal specs from the various manufacturers
Old 07-05-2005, 10:32 AM
  #5  
Cannock
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Cannock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Ca
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, my car does have the PSS9 kit on it. It is lower by about 1". I think I might stick with the standard tire for the street and get a different set of rims for the track. I am considering 18's for the track which I assume I can then use the 265/35's. Anyone have any 18" 8's and 10's for sale?
Old 07-05-2005, 12:58 PM
  #6  
Martin S.
Rennlist Member
 
Martin S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Solana Beach, CA
Posts: 9,608
Received 524 Likes on 346 Posts
Default

I run 235/45/17 fronts on 7" wheels and 275/40/17 rears on 9" wheels, all mounted up on standard Cup wheels. The Tires are Toyo RA-1. This combo works perfectly, andf the rolling radius is < than 1.5%, no ABS issues. I calculated this on an EXCEL spread sheet that all can have if they send me a PM with an e-mail address. If it were a perfect world, I would have 8" wheels on the front, and 10" wheels on the rear...I just didn't want to spend $3,000 on a set of custom wheels for the track.

Note I also drive these tires on the street...they are very quiet compared tpo my formar Kumho Ecsta MX tires.



Quick Reply: 265's on stock 17" rear rims?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:29 AM.