Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Would like to confirm this....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2005, 09:46 PM
  #1  
mr_bock
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
mr_bock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL full time
Posts: 1,534
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
Default Would like to confirm this....

I was talking to a fellow 911 owner and got on the subject of 911 horsepower. He stated that the horsepower listed under specifications in the owners manual was rear wheel horsepower. He went on to say that Porsche always uses rear wheel numbers. Is this true??? Does anyone know for sure. State source of this confermation. Please I hope it isn't true.

Thanks!
Old 04-01-2005, 09:49 PM
  #2  
mrsullivan
Nordschleife Master
 
mrsullivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,622
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

my butt meter tells me that there is no way that could be true...
Old 04-01-2005, 09:54 PM
  #3  
graham_mitchell
Banned
 
graham_mitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Down the rabbit hole
Posts: 26,622
Received 443 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

my 993 Driver's Manual tells me that there is no way that could be true...
Old 04-01-2005, 09:55 PM
  #4  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm pretty sure 993 numbers are CHP, and the RWHP is around 230.

Edit: My 928 is also listed as CHP from the factory. Your friend is just mixed up.
Old 04-01-2005, 09:55 PM
  #5  
kary993
Drifting
 
kary993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 2,166
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That is not ture from what I understand from dyno'ed engines outside the car and in the car.
Old 04-01-2005, 10:05 PM
  #6  
Viken
Keeper of the Truth
Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Viken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,486
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr_bock
He went on to say that Porsche always uses rear wheel numbers. Is this true???
NO! No automobile manufacturer lists rear wheel horsepower. There are too many variables from car to car, from model to model and between transmissions and final drives.
Old 04-01-2005, 10:12 PM
  #7  
FisterD
Rennlist Member
 
FisterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 4,257
Received 44 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr_bock
He stated that the horsepower listed under specifications in the owners manual was rear wheel horsepower.
Please I hope it isn't true.
You hope this isn't true?I wish it was. I would rather have 285 horsepower at the rear wheel,as opposed to at the flywheel. By the time that horsepower gets through your drivetrain, you loose quite a bit.
Old 04-01-2005, 10:23 PM
  #8  
soltino
Rennlist Member
 
soltino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Got a feeling that the 350 HP on the new 911 S is
RWHP.

tino
Old 04-01-2005, 10:23 PM
  #9  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

He probably hopes it isn't true so that he gained 90 hp instead of 50 with the supercharger.
Old 04-01-2005, 10:24 PM
  #10  
Benton
Drifting
 
Benton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 3,348
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by soltino
Got a feeling that the 350 HP on the new 911 S is
RWHP.

tino
Nope...
Old 04-01-2005, 10:44 PM
  #11  
mr_bock
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
mr_bock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: FL full time
Posts: 1,534
Received 36 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Red got it exactly right. My car dyno'd at 202 rwhp before the SC, 322 after. My butt-o-meter is most pleased with the SC results. It just bothered me what this guy was saying. I trust the Rennlist collective mind bank.

Thanks everyone !!!!!!!!
Old 04-01-2005, 10:54 PM
  #12  
FisterD
Rennlist Member
 
FisterD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 4,257
Received 44 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Red
He probably hopes it isn't true so that he gained 90 hp instead of 50 with the supercharger.
Ahhhh, now that makes more sense.
Old 04-02-2005, 12:54 AM
  #13  
deltawedge
Racer
 
deltawedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mr_bock
Red got it exactly right. My car dyno'd at 202 rwhp before the SC, 322 after. My butt-o-meter is most pleased with the SC results. It just bothered me what this guy was saying. I trust the Rennlist collective mind bank.

Thanks everyone !!!!!!!!
What dyno, did you test on and under what conditions (temp, humidity, pressure). I registered 240hp at the rear wheel on a Dynojet at 75F, 50-60RH, and ~30in Hg (with ~ 93.5 octane). The guy running the Dyno said that was a tad more than a new 350Z with 287 crank hp (different drive train, I know). The owner's manual states 270hp as the output for a 95 C2..

202 rwhp sounds very low. A 96 C2 got 223hp during the same day but detonation was audible during the runs. 322 hp sounds fun, however.
Old 04-02-2005, 11:30 PM
  #14  
soltino
Rennlist Member
 
soltino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,630
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Red
Nope...
Sucks Sink. (-%

tino



Quick Reply: Would like to confirm this....



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:18 PM.