Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

DYNO results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 09:46 AM
  #16  
garychios's Avatar
garychios
Pro
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Your welcome!

Its all fun!
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 10:52 AM
  #17  
FlyYellow's Avatar
FlyYellow
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Just wanted to share the results of my dyno testing.

I tested three different chips (stock, authority, GIAC) and 2 air intake systems (powrhaus & stock) and a couple of other minor things.

Rather than posting all of the results and various combos (over 20 different runs), I'll simply say that two things:

1. the best HP produced was this combination:
- GIAC chip
- Stock Air Intake
- RSR Mufflers
- RS pulley

2. There was a 19hp difference between the worst config and this one.

Here is the chart:


Cheers,
Boris
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 11:53 AM
  #18  
Carrera Mike's Avatar
Carrera Mike
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 18
From: Right Coast
Default

Originally posted by duc916
Mike, What gear were the dyno runs done in 3rd or 4th?
The shop tech said he Ran it in 4th gear.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 01:03 PM
  #19  
flatair's Avatar
flatair
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Whether or not dynos of the same model should dyno with the same numbers, the power curves should look similar. I took Mike's dyno and another one from a similar car (one from the other thread) and overlaid them with some interesting results. There is a small difference overall between the two curves, which could be because of environmental differences, fuel, etc - but the real thing to look at is the top end. If you look at Mike's hp/tq curve, it's kinda flat past 5K, where the other shows a nice gradual curve. Might be misfire, or the engine might be sensing high rpm knock and be pulling back the timing (due to engine temps, lack of airflow from a fan, or a crappy batch of fuel perhaps), or might be unusual restriction in intake or exhaust - once found that a squirrel made a nice home in the airbox of my 91 MR2 turbo Just some ideas. Here's the dyno:
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
merged.jpg (29.7 KB, 302 views)
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 01:38 PM
  #20  
Derrick B.'s Avatar
Derrick B.
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 417
Likes: 0
From: No. VA
Default

Nice job, Flatair. You called it right off the bat. The 'composite' dyno chart you made (photoshopped?) really shows where Carrera Mike's car has a flattened power delivery at high RPM. It is very impressive how the two graphs lay over each other. They are quite close together.

If 18" wheels were the cause of the difference, wouldn't they simply run parallel, one under the other? Larger wheels do make a difference, as they generally take more energy to accelerate (and that's what we're
measuring on the dyno). I just don't think that is what caused your differences.
This is good stuff. Thanks for sharing, guys.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 02:11 PM
  #21  
Carrera Mike's Avatar
Carrera Mike
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 18
From: Right Coast
Default

Flatair and Derrick,

Thanks for the pointers and graphs. The other thing I remembered too is I told the Tech Driver driver not to red line the car, so I don't know if he lifted the acell pedal as he pass 6100rpm. The shop was openning too that day, so it was their first day doing it. My car was the first one too to have a dual distributor that day, so they have to figur out their connection. I'll try again next week with a shop who's known to do porsches and will do it in three pulls.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 02:29 PM
  #22  
flatair's Avatar
flatair
Racer
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 300
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Graphs, numbers, etc aside, I'm not meaning to alarm you btw Mike It definitely could be the 'driver' letting off, or the flat top end might just be something environmental - i.e. if there isn't a fan blowing cool air over the engine, the heat in the engine bay could spike causing hot air to be drawn into the engine as well as slightly raising the overall likelyhood for triggering the knock sensor. Here is a GREAT article in Car & Driver about this very thing:

http://www.caranddriver.com/article....rticle_id=8020

Similar model dynos *should* give fairly similar numbers between similar cars under very tightly controlled environmental conditions, but these environmental conditions are what can vary the output numbers by a huge margin (as illustrated in the article linked above). Steve Dinan found a variance of *77* rwhp on a Dinan S2 tuned BMW M5 simply by adding a big fan in front of the car. It would be interesting to try the same thing with the 993...hmmmm!

Brad
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #23  
Carrera Mike's Avatar
Carrera Mike
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 18
From: Right Coast
Default

Brad, That article is very enlightening. Engine being cooled down by a big fan while they run it makes a huge difference!

Let me ask you guys who got at least 240HPs, did your dyno shops have a fan blowing into the 'oil cooler radiator, and maybe directly onto the engine when you did your pulls? 'cause mine, all they did is have the engine hood up

Last edited by Carrera Mike; Apr 28, 2004 at 05:53 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 03:37 PM
  #24  
Crimson Nape Racing's Avatar
Crimson Nape Racing
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,086
Likes: 2
From: Gemantown, TN
Default

Mike - they had a big fan blowing onto the front of the car, but the back was just sitting there with the hood up. The back was, however, only a couple feet from the big overhead door.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 06:52 PM
  #25  
914und993's Avatar
914und993
Pro
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa, OK
Default

Squirrel cage fan was blowing into the oil cooler on my runs and one onto the engine bay. Cooler air going into the intake could account for some of that 15hp difference, but not all.

A fan on the oil cooler will keep the car cooler for during several pulls, but if your oil temp is in the normal position at the start of one run, I don't think a fan isn't going to make any difference for that one run.

Chip
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 08:35 PM
  #26  
FlyYellow's Avatar
FlyYellow
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
From: SF Bay Area
Default

mine did not have any fans...
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #27  
Carrera Mike's Avatar
Carrera Mike
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 18
From: Right Coast
Default

Boris, I'm sorry. I was actually typing my response to your chart/graph at work early this afternoon when I got pulled out to the flight line for some issues.

How long did it take you to do all these switching and testing? Must cost a fortune. Did you actually test the stock twin pulley vs the RS single pulley? How much difference? I'm taking mine back this tuesday for a 3 pull session.

Last edited by Carrera Mike; Apr 29, 2004 at 07:34 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 08:55 PM
  #28  
Carrera Mike's Avatar
Carrera Mike
Thread Starter
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,773
Likes: 18
From: Right Coast
Default

Bob and Chip, I talked to the dyno shop thats going to do my car next Tuesday. I expressed to them my concern on cooling/ventilation effect on temp sensors that retards the timing and richens(is that a word) the fuel/air mix. We'll see..
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 12:16 AM
  #29  
FlyYellow's Avatar
FlyYellow
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,957
Likes: 1
From: SF Bay Area
Default

mike,

it took me 2 hrs. but i didn't take the rs pulley off or try it without the mufflers. i tried 3 different air intakes & 3 different chips.

btw, mine is a '95 993 so it does not have varioram.

cheers,
boris
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2004 | 02:19 AM
  #30  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 11,870
Likes: 75
From: Portland Oregon
Default

If I might add a few thoughts,....


1) Knock sensor activity can be observed in real time with a scan tool (OBD-II) to see if that is a factor. If in doubt, run 50% or more unleaded race gas.

2) 993's seem to vary and IMHO, this is partly due to variances in cam timing from the Factory.

For the folks who do not clearly understand the implications of this, you should know that slightly retarded cam timing results in a bit more high RPM power and slightly advanced cam timing gives more low-end power. In short, adjusting cam timing shifts the power and RPM up or down a bit.

When I see low output numbers, I will perform a leakdown test and then watch the knock sensors with a scan tool during initial dyno runs before the engine get really hot,...
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:45 PM.