Differences between FD SSK and Rothsport SSK for a 993 C2
#1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I am looking at enhancing the "shift feel" and reducing the "throw" for my 97 C2. I like to maintain the "stock look" of the interior of my car, so I will not be replacing my shift ****, shift boot cover, etc. with a different one. I would like to know the pros and cons of each so that I can make an informed decision. For example, what is the exact throw difference between the two (how many inches?), the height difference between the two, shift feel between the two, etc. Any information would be much appreciated.
#2
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you are referring to the Rothsport one which integrates the shifter and the shift **** as a machined aluminum piece, you will not retain the look of the OE. You will need to go down the path of a SSK from FDM.
Here are both
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...-short-shifter
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...hort-shift-kit
Both are great, but different.
I would also budget the goldenrod since you are "in there"
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...fdm-golden-rod
Here are both
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...-short-shifter
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...hort-shift-kit
Both are great, but different.
I would also budget the goldenrod since you are "in there"
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...fdm-golden-rod
#3
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you are referring to the Rothsport one which integrates the shifter and the shift **** as a machined aluminum piece, you will not retain the look of the OE. You will need to go down the path of a SSK from FDM.
I would also budget the goldenrod since you are "in there"
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...fdm-golden-rod
I would also budget the goldenrod since you are "in there"
https://fdmotorsports.net/shop/ols/p...fdm-golden-rod
https://www.rothsport.com/Products/T...rt-Shifter.htm
I'm curious too, as to whether or not they "feel" different, all other things being equal. The Rothsport shifter certainly looks very solid, but that comes at additional cost.
#4
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have mentioned this before. I know Jeff, go to Roths[ort often, have seen his units, felt them, and talked to him. His is for 2wd only, while Darin's is for either. Jeff has a version, like Samurai and Ivan mention, where you can use your own ****.
There is a significant difference in the linkage between Rothsport's and Darin's, Rothsport is more direct, objectively tighter in its feel, something which is impossible to accomplish given our 4 wd setup.
I have Darin's ssk, and GR on my C4S. I know Darin and have met, and not disparaging marvelous FD Motorsports or him!
There is a significant difference in the linkage between Rothsport's and Darin's, Rothsport is more direct, objectively tighter in its feel, something which is impossible to accomplish given our 4 wd setup.
I have Darin's ssk, and GR on my C4S. I know Darin and have met, and not disparaging marvelous FD Motorsports or him!
The following users liked this post:
Reg Liyanage (07-04-2020)
#5
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ah, did not know that! I have the all in one unit.
As a fyi... The FDM ones are an "upgraded" OE RS shifter. Darin modifies the OE version to replace the shift rod with a solid spherical end instead of a plastic bushing that the OE one uses.
As a fyi... The FDM ones are an "upgraded" OE RS shifter. Darin modifies the OE version to replace the shift rod with a solid spherical end instead of a plastic bushing that the OE one uses.
#6
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Great information. Hopefully, this thread will help others in the future in making an informed decision between the two set ups.
To sum up information from this thread as well as others:
1) Throw Differences, Rothsport mentions that their throw is 1 inch less on their website. I have read on one of the threads that the FD throw is about 20% less; so about 2 inches. Is this assertion correct?
2) I have also read that the FD height is 1 inch lower than stock, what about Rothsport set up (using the stock shifter and ****)?
3) FSA mentioned that the feel is "tighter" so more precise shifts for the Rothsport? Does tighter mean more effort to shift, or it tracks better through the gears, or both?
4) If one were to shift very quickly, which set up would be better? Will the tighter feel of the Rothsport slow down the shifting speed?
5) I have also read that Rothsport is MUCH more difficult to install which is a by-product of the more precise setup (much tighter tolerances). Is this a correct assumption?
6) I have also read that even though the Rothsport is double sheer, the actual feel is very similar to FD ie. not much difference to account for the much-increased cost of the Rothsport. Increased installation time for the Rothsport may be an additional hidden cost difference. Is this assumption correct?
To sum up information from this thread as well as others:
1) Throw Differences, Rothsport mentions that their throw is 1 inch less on their website. I have read on one of the threads that the FD throw is about 20% less; so about 2 inches. Is this assertion correct?
2) I have also read that the FD height is 1 inch lower than stock, what about Rothsport set up (using the stock shifter and ****)?
3) FSA mentioned that the feel is "tighter" so more precise shifts for the Rothsport? Does tighter mean more effort to shift, or it tracks better through the gears, or both?
4) If one were to shift very quickly, which set up would be better? Will the tighter feel of the Rothsport slow down the shifting speed?
5) I have also read that Rothsport is MUCH more difficult to install which is a by-product of the more precise setup (much tighter tolerances). Is this a correct assumption?
6) I have also read that even though the Rothsport is double sheer, the actual feel is very similar to FD ie. not much difference to account for the much-increased cost of the Rothsport. Increased installation time for the Rothsport may be an additional hidden cost difference. Is this assumption correct?
Last edited by Reg Liyanage; 07-04-2020 at 06:46 PM.
The following users liked this post:
M. Schneider (07-05-2020)
#7
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is important to figure out:
FSA mentioned that the feel is "tighter" so more precise shifts for the Rothsport? Does tighter mean more effort to shift, or it tracks better through the gears, or both?
If one were to shift very quickly, which set up would be better? Will the tighter feel of the Rothsport slow down the shifting speed?
FSA mentioned that the feel is "tighter" so more precise shifts for the Rothsport? Does tighter mean more effort to shift, or it tracks better through the gears, or both?
If one were to shift very quickly, which set up would be better? Will the tighter feel of the Rothsport slow down the shifting speed?
Trending Topics
#8
Racer
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think that any of these options actually allow one to "shift faster". I think it is more about the feel, and sense of precision. At least, that was my experience based on upgrading to the RS SSK with the FD Golden Rod.
#9
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you want to shift very quickly, get a PDK 991. It's a manual transmission, it shifts pretty much as fast as other modern manual transmissions. You are limited here not by shift linkages or bushings but by how manual transmissions work -- syncros, etc.
In general I think you're overthinking this. The various parts you mention all do pretty much the same thing, improve the shifter feel. That's about it.
In general I think you're overthinking this. The various parts you mention all do pretty much the same thing, improve the shifter feel. That's about it.
The following users liked this post:
M. Schneider (07-05-2020)
#10
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@Ivan J Great info. it is nice to hear from an actual user of the Rothsport SSK and the FD Golden Rod. I assume you are happy with the set up and have no regrets. Questions:
The throw length, are you happy with it?
Was the installation of the Rothsport set up difficult?
Would you pick it again over the FD set up if you had to do it all over again?
I will be pulling the trigger tomorrow hence the detailed questions. Thanks for your response.
The throw length, are you happy with it?
Was the installation of the Rothsport set up difficult?
Would you pick it again over the FD set up if you had to do it all over again?
I will be pulling the trigger tomorrow hence the detailed questions. Thanks for your response.
#11
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@fsa You seem to prefer the Rothsport set up over the FD based on your response. Have you tried both and prefer the Rothsport set up?
I understand both setups are good. There is a significant cost difference, but I do not mind spending more if Rothsport has a noticeably "better" feel, or some other noticeable advantage. Which one has the shorter throw in your opinion? Either way, I will be purchasing the FD Golden Rod with the SSK. Thanks for your response.
I understand both setups are good. There is a significant cost difference, but I do not mind spending more if Rothsport has a noticeably "better" feel, or some other noticeable advantage. Which one has the shorter throw in your opinion? Either way, I will be purchasing the FD Golden Rod with the SSK. Thanks for your response.
Last edited by Reg Liyanage; 07-04-2020 at 11:57 PM.
#12
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@samurai_k I intend to get either set up with the FD golden rod, that is a given since it is a great product from the reviews I have read.
If money were no object which of the two would you pick? And no one has yet answered the question about which one has a shorter throw? Was your installation difficult? Thanks for your response.
If money were no object which of the two would you pick? And no one has yet answered the question about which one has a shorter throw? Was your installation difficult? Thanks for your response.
#13
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
@Churchill Acknowledged. So it is all about the "feel", which is important. Which of the two has the better "feel" in your opinion? Thanks for your response.
The following 4 users liked this post by Churchill:
#15
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Long Beach, CA & Alexandria, EGYPT
Posts: 1,551
Received 325 Likes
on
161 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have mentioned this before. I know Jeff, go to Roths[ort often, have seen his units, felt them, and talked to him. His is for 2wd only, while Darin's is for either. Jeff has a version, like Samurai and Ivan mention, where you can use your own ****.
There is a significant difference in the linkage between Rothsport's and Darin's, Rothsport is more direct, objectively tighter in its feel, something which is impossible to accomplish given our 4 wd setup.
I have Darin's ssk, and GR on my C4S. I know Darin and have met, and not disparaging marvelous FD Motorsports or him!
There is a significant difference in the linkage between Rothsport's and Darin's, Rothsport is more direct, objectively tighter in its feel, something which is impossible to accomplish given our 4 wd setup.
I have Darin's ssk, and GR on my C4S. I know Darin and have met, and not disparaging marvelous FD Motorsports or him!