Notices
993 Forum 1995-1998

Exhaust question (X-pipes Vs)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2018, 06:16 PM
  #1  
Porsche-ah
Instructor
Thread Starter
 
Porsche-ah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Toronto
Posts: 220
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts
Default Exhaust question (X-pipes Vs)

I'm currently running Cargraphic 100cell "cross" pipes

Having the upgrade itch...

Is there any gain/benefit if I went with the fabspeed or similar type "X-pipe"?

thanks in advance!
Old 10-11-2018, 07:13 AM
  #2  
GBX
Rennlist Member
 
GBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: LI
Posts: 2,437
Received 268 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

Always thought cross pipes performed better then x pipes. Curious to hear other opinions

if you do it, would love to see a before and after Dyno.
Old 10-11-2018, 07:27 AM
  #3  
JZ98-993
Racer
 
JZ98-993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 468
Received 46 Likes on 32 Posts
Default

Sound..... x pipes sound gooood
Old 10-11-2018, 11:47 AM
  #4  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,254
Received 511 Likes on 351 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Porsche-ah
I'm currently running Cargraphic 100cell "cross" pipes

Having the upgrade itch...

Is there any gain/benefit if I went with the fabspeed or similar type "X-pipe"?

thanks in advance!
All exhaust setups are a compromise of many design variables
what it needs to do is allow the movement of the largest mass of exhaust gas in the shortest amount of time w/ the least amount of restriction while at the same time(in a street car) keeping the noise level down to an acceptable level.

A 911 6 cyl motor has a very favorable even firing pattern, every 240° of crank rotation a slug of exhaust gas enters a given bank, these slugs are merged in the collector, if the merge is properly done the lower pressure region between slugs can help accelerate the flow of the next slug in the procession, if the transition isn't carefully and properly managed it can slow and disrupt the parade, having more room between the pulses makes the management easier to process. The pipes can't be too big or too small, shorter is better than longer, heat retention is a +, the transitions and bends need to be as smooth and few as possible, merges need to be carefully crafted to induce less turbulence.

An x pipe merges the 2 sides, as w/ the merge at the collectors this can be a good or a bad thing depending on how carefully it is done, The separation between pulses is half that in the collectors so the merge is more difficult to construct, pressures and speeds are lower which further muddies the water. The fact that merges are a huge plus on odd fire engines like US V8s further confuses peoples evaluation of an X. In odd fire engines like say a Chevrolet V8 the pules are irregularly spaced, 270-180-90-180 on a a given side, the 180 is fine the 270 is great but the 90 overloads the collector and downstream flow unless it is oversized for that one regime, hence a cross over is placed close to the header to relieve the over pressure. 911s don't need that.

The primary benefit of the x is in noise suppression, the acoustic signals have double the choice for paths and so get attenuated more efficiently



Quick Reply: Exhaust question (X-pipes Vs)



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 11:33 PM.