2020 NEXT GENERATION 992 SPY PICS & RELEASE
#3181
SJW, a Carin' kinda guy
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Long hoods are stunning, G-body is ugly, 964 is ugly, 993 they sort of got it right, but the entire 1974-98 was a compromise of the original design. All singer does, in essence, is install long hood style body panels on 964 with wider tenders.
#3182
#3183
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I grew up in the era of G bodies and I still like them a great deal. I always thought the long hoods looked ancient in comparison. The best looking air-cooled car was the 993 however. The 964 was never on my radar as the design of the bumpers killed the look of the 911 for me.
#3184
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Generally in OT / P&C
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
9 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Not only caught your drift, smacked me in the head!!
Macan, Cayenne, Panamera
Attachment 1293980
Attachment 1293982
Attachment 1293979
Attachment 1293981
Attachment 1293983
Attachment 1293984
Attachment 1293985
Macan, Cayenne, Panamera
Attachment 1293980
Attachment 1293982
Attachment 1293979
Attachment 1293981
Attachment 1293983
Attachment 1293984
Attachment 1293985
#3185
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Could not disagree more. The G body cars look so much better than the 964. The 964 did't even look like a 911 to me. It looked like someone took a marshmallow, pressed it into kinda 911 shape, slapped the ugliest wheels on it and called it a car.
#3186
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I think pure EV Porsches will be on unique platforms.
#3187
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
If you're gonna go old skool, do it right or don't do it at all.
RUF
Attachment 1294005
Attachment 1294004
Attachment 1294007
RUF
Attachment 1294005
Attachment 1294004
Attachment 1294007
![Cool](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/cool.gif)
#3188
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The side markers finally look right-side up, and the shape is echoed in the door handles. Nice design. Always hated how the bumper seam was forced up into the headlights on the 991, and continues to be awkward between headlights and frunk lid. The 992 is simplicity here, regardless of previous 911 designs...of which you can see some long hood, some G-model/964, and some 993 if you think about it. In comparison the 991's creases on top of the bumpers are pointless, trying to provide something visually in the empty space between the frunk lid and front of the car, whereas the 992 brings the frunk lid forward so the long nose makes more sense visually (that said, I haven't liked the long front overhang on any water-cooled models). Wider front track looks great and will improve handling. The frunk lid creases are a bit retro, but they work IMO...makes the wide, flat lid on the 991 look bland.
I do think the intakes and side view mirrors are a bit too square for such a rounded design, but not enough to bother me.
#3189
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The car on the left looks simple, organic, elegant. The car on the right looks angular, angry and busy. You can't look at those two pictures and with a straight face say the headlight/hood/bumper transition area looks better on the 992.
#3190
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
However, in time Porsche will make a refresh or some kind of fascia that will fix it all. They actually already have it but they just not showing us yet.
Also the sport design mirrors on the 991 shame the 992 elephant ear mirrors ala Lexus.
#3191
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#3192
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The essential differences are, for me, a yawn. The 992 shape looks like a 991 with new caps front an rear, and there is nothing I don't like about the 991 or the 992. I saw a 992 on the road with the spoiler up and thought it looked just as "interesting" as the 991s. Nothing sleek about either - no worse that the old ducktail- but not close to the class of a "real" Turbo.
It will take a substantial performance improvement to get me interested. That could happen, but to be honest (with myself), I haven't ever been disappointed by the performance of my SPASM PSE NA C2S.
It will take a substantial performance improvement to get me interested. That could happen, but to be honest (with myself), I haven't ever been disappointed by the performance of my SPASM PSE NA C2S.
#3194
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Trying to catch-up/keep-up with this thread is a challenge! Love most of the 992 design cues, with the "squared-off" hood opening being a favorite. My first Porsche was a Boxster, which I loved, but when I got a 993 C4S, I realized what Porsche styling could and should be. A 928 S4 also opened my eyes a bit, and I came to view the 986/996 as "less than" many predecessors.
The 997 regained the Porsche-magic a bit, and the 991 blew me away. I'm hoping the 992 makes me feel the same way as when I first saw the 991. Some of the rear-end styling elements give me pause, but will hopefully work well in the metal.
The 997 regained the Porsche-magic a bit, and the 991 blew me away. I'm hoping the 992 makes me feel the same way as when I first saw the 991. Some of the rear-end styling elements give me pause, but will hopefully work well in the metal.
#3195
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
With so much negativity, thought I'd put a positive spin on it...coming from somebody that has had and enjoyed long-hood, G-model, 993, and 997 generations:
The side markers finally look right-side up, and the shape is echoed in the door handles. Nice design. Always hated how the bumper seam was forced up into the headlights on the 991, and continues to be awkward between headlights and frunk lid. The 992 is simplicity here, regardless of previous 911 designs...of which you can see some long hood, some G-model/964, and some 993 if you think about it. In comparison the 991's creases on top of the bumpers are pointless, trying to provide something visually in the empty space between the frunk lid and front of the car, whereas the 992 brings the frunk lid forward so the long nose makes more sense visually (that said, I haven't liked the long front overhang on any water-cooled models). Wider front track looks great and will improve handling. The frunk lid creases are a bit retro, but they work IMO...makes the wide, flat lid on the 991 look bland.
I do think the intakes and side view mirrors are a bit too square for such a rounded design, but not enough to bother me.
The side markers finally look right-side up, and the shape is echoed in the door handles. Nice design. Always hated how the bumper seam was forced up into the headlights on the 991, and continues to be awkward between headlights and frunk lid. The 992 is simplicity here, regardless of previous 911 designs...of which you can see some long hood, some G-model/964, and some 993 if you think about it. In comparison the 991's creases on top of the bumpers are pointless, trying to provide something visually in the empty space between the frunk lid and front of the car, whereas the 992 brings the frunk lid forward so the long nose makes more sense visually (that said, I haven't liked the long front overhang on any water-cooled models). Wider front track looks great and will improve handling. The frunk lid creases are a bit retro, but they work IMO...makes the wide, flat lid on the 991 look bland.
I do think the intakes and side view mirrors are a bit too square for such a rounded design, but not enough to bother me.