992 GENTIAN BLUE PICTURES!
#226
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![](https://cimg5.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1389/img_0642_46ef6a37a72f40774aa4bbdf3dc4757f7e4d81c0.jpeg)
![](https://cimg6.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1504/img_0644_f3891a2fef706193e229dc15585b8ae8d97c1f63.jpeg)
![](https://cimg7.ibsrv.net/gimg/rennlist.com-vbulletin/2000x1351/img_0633_2fc21c85aecf6e5eb34852cee4cbd82f6ede8063.jpeg)
The following 3 users liked this post by gthal:
#229
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
thanks! Pictures don’t do the color or car justice. The build quality and refinement is certainly better than my 991.2. I hear people complaining of the ride being rougher. I can’t say I notice it. The tech and dash is also better. Of course less “analog” but what does that mean? I have a 97 C2S if I want to see, feel, and hear “analog”. As Ferris said. “If you have the means, I highly recommend picking one up”