Notices
992 2019-Present The Forum for the Non-Turbo 911
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

992 chassis: Is it all new? Engine moved toward the middle? Torsional rigidity?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-29-2018, 04:51 AM
  #1  
K-A
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 135 Likes on 94 Posts
Default 992 chassis: Is it all new? Engine moved toward the middle? Torsional rigidity?

What we (I) do know is that contrary to previous belief, the wheelbase is identical. Therefore the extra length is all in the front overhang. The 992, also contrary to what was previously reported, is .2" higher than the 991.2 (maybe the larger rear wheels have to do with that). It's also about 150 lbs heavier than the 991.2, making it about 250 lbs heavier than the 991.1.

C&D reported that the structure under the skin is similar to the 991. Which starts to lead me to believe it is the same chassis.

Two things that can help answer that: Has Porsche released torsional rigidity figures, and if so, what are they (the 991 is around 40K nm)? Although, even with increased rigidity figures, it can be the same chassis. Still curious to know the rigidity compared to the 991 (e.g: the 991 is 25% stiffer than the 997).

Also, I still haven't seen anything about the engine moving more towards the middle again. This was a big talking point during the testing phase, as it was nearly bond that it was moving further forward. Now, not so sure.
Old 11-29-2018, 07:54 AM
  #2  
Joenyc
Instructor
 
Joenyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: NYC & FLA
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also the rear was set to have space for the hybrid ie batteries
Old 11-29-2018, 05:11 PM
  #3  
Alan Smithee
Rennlist Member
 
Alan Smithee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,270
Received 259 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

From the first spy photos it has been quite clearly an evolution of the 991, not an all-new car. 964>993, 996>997, 991>992...
Old 11-29-2018, 05:35 PM
  #4  
Chris3963
Rennlist Member
 
Chris3963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Antipodes
Posts: 2,639
Received 1,083 Likes on 384 Posts
Default

As somebody else stated its virtually a 991.3. Its an evolution of the existing 991.2 car. Its not a new platform.

However, while the engine is in the same place, they have significantly changed how and where is it mounted in order to improve the overall stiffness of the chassis.
Old 11-29-2018, 06:08 PM
  #5  
abiazis
Rennlist Member
 
abiazis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Berkeley Lake, Georgia
Posts: 4,125
Received 698 Likes on 510 Posts
Default

Disappointed...
Old 11-30-2018, 06:49 AM
  #6  
K-A
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
K-A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,452
Received 135 Likes on 94 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Alan Smithee
From the first spy photos it has been quite clearly an evolution of the 991, not an all-new car. 964>993, 996>997, 991>992...
Good and concise way to put it. And spot on.

Originally Posted by Chris3963
As somebody else stated its virtually a 991.3. Its an evolution of the existing 991.2 car. Its not a new platform.

However, while the engine is in the same place, they have significantly changed how and where is it mounted in order to improve the overall stiffness of the chassis.
Interesting. Any links on them going into detail on said placement and stiffness? And has anyone stated how much stiffer the 992 is (percentage or otherwise)?
Old 11-30-2018, 02:03 PM
  #7  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,704
Received 541 Likes on 368 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
Good and concise way to put it. And spot on.



Interesting. Any links on them going into detail on said placement and stiffness? And has anyone stated how much stiffer the 992 is (percentage or otherwise)?
I looked around the 992 at the LA Autoshow yesterday. From what I can tell, no change to location of the engine judging by the distance of the oil pan to the rear cross member. If it was shifted at all, can't be more than 10mm. However, there was no visibility to engine mount locations and whatnot, so it's quite possible those were moved around.
Old 11-30-2018, 04:08 PM
  #8  
Ccpecot
Rennlist Member
 
Ccpecot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Johns Creek, GA
Posts: 261
Received 15 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

According to Road and Track: Porsche also moved the engine mounts 20mm further forward in the chassis, increasing rigidity and shifting the weight balance a little bit.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.roa...specs-details/
Old 11-30-2018, 07:01 PM
  #9  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,704
Received 541 Likes on 368 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ccpecot
According to Road and Track: Porsche also moved the engine mounts 20mm further forward in the chassis, increasing rigidity and shifting the weight balance a little bit.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.roa...specs-details/
I'm guessing just the engine mounts were moved. Those mounts are located nearly all the way at the back of the car, so moving them forward a bit helps with the balance and rigidity. Makes sense.
Old 12-15-2018, 12:55 AM
  #10  
FrenchToast
Three Wheelin'
 
FrenchToast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,969
Likes: 0
Received 74 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by K-A
Interesting. Any links on them going into detail on said placement and stiffness? And has anyone stated how much stiffer the 992 is (percentage or otherwise)?
R&T claims the 992 is 5% stiffer than outgoing 991.2. (click for source)

R&T specifies the 991.2 rather than saying 991; are they are implying a 991.2 is stiffer than a comparable 991? I don't know.

Anyway, the 991 is supposedly 40,000 NM per degree.

Originally Posted by jumper5836
991 40k nm/deg
5% increase would place the 992 at 42,000 NM/deg.

The same R&T article also says the engine mounts (says nothing about engine centerline) have moved forward a not-really-believable 6.6" (168mm), rather than the 20mm previously quoted.

Originally Posted by Road & Track
To better control the movement of the flat-six hanging behind the rear wheels, the 992 moves the engine mounts forward 6.6 inches. (click for source)
Originally Posted by Road & Track
Porsche also moved the engine mounts 20mm further forward in the chassis, increasing rigidity and shifting the weight balance a little bit forward. (click for source)
While everything is relative, I would not say the 992 is just a "991.3." The chassis is entirely different and reengineered. Things changed include the wheelbase, suspension geometry, engine placement, track width, etc. Engineered from the ground up? No, but nothing ever is.

Anyway, the 992 chassis uses around 60% aluminum, 991 was around 30%. That statistic alone is evidence the chassis would have to be comprehensively reevaluated for stiffness, deflection, handling, crashworthiness, corrosion resistance, fatigue, etc.

Last edited by FrenchToast; 12-15-2018 at 01:39 AM.
Old 12-15-2018, 02:06 AM
  #11  
pietrostone
Instructor
 
pietrostone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 124
Likes: 0
Received 118 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

The 992 use the new MMB platform





The following users liked this post:
pride355 (04-18-2021)
Old 12-15-2018, 03:38 AM
  #12  
groundhog
Race Car
 
groundhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 3,757
Received 1,013 Likes on 644 Posts
Default

The engine mounts are 20cm further forward according to the marketing document supplied to dealers.
Old 12-15-2018, 05:06 AM
  #13  
erik_plus8
Burning Brakes
 
erik_plus8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Europe
Posts: 780
Received 57 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

So there will be a GT3 Cab.
Old 12-15-2018, 08:49 AM
  #14  
fxz
Race Car
 
fxz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The way to hell is paved by good intentions “Wenn ich Purist höre...entsichere ich meinen Browning” "Myths are fuel for marketing (and nowadays for flippers too,,,)" time to time is not sufficient to be a saint, you must be also an Hero
Posts: 4,438
Received 421 Likes on 249 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by pietrostone
The 992 use the new MMB platform





Platform MMB that will be used for the next 718
Old 12-15-2018, 10:50 AM
  #15  
garfunkle
Banned
 
garfunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,348
Received 1,146 Likes on 629 Posts
Default

When the 991.1 came out it was the perfect 911. Until the 991.2 arrived. With the 992 and such a change as moving the engine mounts forward... why the he didn’t someone think of that in 2012? Seems like such a basic, common sense engineering component.

Btw, since it’s the same chassis... that’s a testimony to just how good the 991.1 chassis is! With the likes of carbon fiber and monocoque coming down market, no way Porsche would release a new 911 that wasn’t competitive.


Quick Reply: 992 chassis: Is it all new? Engine moved toward the middle? Torsional rigidity?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:54 AM.