Notices
992 Turbo and Turbo S 2019-Current

Bilstein EVO SE Suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2026 | 12:10 PM
  #1  
cutlass476's Avatar
cutlass476
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
Veteran: Navy
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,098
Likes: 731
From: Florida
Default Bilstein EVO SE Suspension

Does anyone have the Bilstein EVO SE's (part no. 49-320657 is for SPASM w/ FAL) installed on their car? Part No. 49-300581 is for PASM w/FAL. I'm curious if there is a significant difference between the two FAL versions. Ironically, 49-300581 is a special order now from Bilstein. I can also confirm that people with SPASM and FAL have installed 49-300581 on their 992's and have been very happy with the set up. The spring rates are as follows:

49-300581 - (49/130 N/mm, Progressive/Progressive)


49-320657 - (60/130 N/mm, Linear/Progressive)
However, based upon the appearance of the front springs on 320657, I don't believe that they are actually linear rate springs. I'm just not sure if there is that much difference in stiffness/ride quality.
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:21 AM.