Car & Driver: 3.8L -> 3.6L for TTS 992.2
#1
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As the title says, C&D reports huge changes including less displacement on 992.2 Turbo. Having just taken delivery of my TTS, curious what buyers think about this.
I’d be a bit bummed bc 3.8 is larger than 3.6
Link to article
I’d be a bit bummed bc 3.8 is larger than 3.6
Link to article
#2
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Interesting times. Looks like the 992.1 will be a keeper!
I can say, the vertical grills, seem worse than what is current. I do like the analogue tach.
Canada is saying they're mandating 100% of all new vehicle sales to be EV by 2035, times are changing quickly here.
I can say, the vertical grills, seem worse than what is current. I do like the analogue tach.
Canada is saying they're mandating 100% of all new vehicle sales to be EV by 2035, times are changing quickly here.
#3
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Town of Webb, NY/Huntingdon Valley, PA
Posts: 1,842
Received 772 Likes
on
486 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
It's a 3.7 engine (3,745 cc) , they used to call it a 3.8, but were called out on it, later changed to 3.7, but it's been that size for a long time, they could make it a 3.6 with no problem and no loss of power
#4
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Last edited by CanAutM3; 12-21-2023 at 09:40 AM.
The following users liked this post:
hcvone (12-21-2023)
#5
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't think anyone will care about the small displacement change as long as the performance from a dig or a roll is the same. Somehow I predict Porsche will come up with a small increase in horsepower for marketing reasons. We all know the 992 is underrated at 640hp
![Wink](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
The following users liked this post:
Breen (12-21-2023)
#6
Three Wheelin'
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#7
Race Car
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
As the title says, C&D reports huge changes including less displacement on 992.2 Turbo. Having just taken delivery of my TTS, curious what buyers think about this.
I’d be a bit bummed bc 3.8 is larger than 3.6
Link to article
I’d be a bit bummed bc 3.8 is larger than 3.6
Link to article
Trending Topics
#8
#9
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#10
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I’ve come around to the view the hybrid 911 turbo s will be better and more fun than the non hybrid. We have the 918 and now the Ferrari 296 showing us the way.
The following 3 users liked this post by vcp13:
#11
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,253
Received 1,214 Likes
on
598 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Both of these cars use very expensive materials and tech to compensate for the weight of the hybrid component. It's extremely unlikely Porsche will go to the same length on its non-halo cars, especially given its "plan 20" or the push to have 20% (very high) profit margin on its cars - even GT3 RS does not have CF tub or any major structural CF now. So I expect weight to be an issue. Hopefully, they'll address it to some degree for 994, but definitely not in 992.2.
The following users liked this post:
AlexCeres (12-22-2023)
#12
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Both of these cars use very expensive materials and tech to compensate for the weight of the hybrid component. It's extremely unlikely Porsche will go to the same length on its non-halo cars, especially given its "plan 20" or the push to have 20% (very high) profit margin on its cars - even GT3 RS does not have CF tub or any major structural CF now. So I expect weight to be an issue. Hopefully, they'll address it to some degree for 994, but definitely not in 992.2.
Not talking about the 918 (as that's essentially a relic and 1M car at this point).
But the 296, what "expensive materials" is Ferrari using to keep the weight "down" to a real world ~3700 lb? Which is still about 300 lbs heavier than the real world weight of the F8 (at around 3400).
The chassis is still aluminum (just like the F8), as there's no carbon monocoque, and the car doesn't even come with RWS.
The following users liked this post:
AlexCeres (12-22-2023)
The following 2 users liked this post by eclou:
AlexCeres (12-22-2023),
daveo4porsche (12-22-2023)
#14
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
yeah, this hybrid system is tiny. It'll add some nice torque to fill in the turbos, and improve emissions. That's about all. It's nothing like the 296 / Artura setup. The 296 weighs the same as a TTS anyway with just aluminum construction. The Artura is solidly 300# lighter with the carbon monocoque. I don't think that's a problem for the TTS given where it already is.
The following users liked this post:
Manifold (12-22-2023)
#15
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: West Vancouver and San Francisco
Posts: 4,253
Received 1,214 Likes
on
598 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Like what?
Not talking about the 918 (as that's essentially a relic and 1M car at this point).
But the 296, what "expensive materials" is Ferrari using to keep the weight "down" to a real world ~3700 lb? Which is still about 300 lbs heavier than the real world weight of the F8 (at around 3400).
The chassis is still aluminum (just like the F8), as there's no carbon monocoque, and the car doesn't even come with RWS.
Not talking about the 918 (as that's essentially a relic and 1M car at this point).
But the 296, what "expensive materials" is Ferrari using to keep the weight "down" to a real world ~3700 lb? Which is still about 300 lbs heavier than the real world weight of the F8 (at around 3400).
The chassis is still aluminum (just like the F8), as there's no carbon monocoque, and the car doesn't even come with RWS.
I'm not dunking on 992 - it's more than the sum of its parts and IMO one of the very best cars ever made. Out of all mass-produced in existence, I picked 992 Turbo S as my daily driver purely based on its merit. But I do wish it were lighter more than I wish it were more powerful.
Last edited by MaxLTV; 12-22-2023 at 11:02 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Breen (12-22-2023)