992 RS Brake Pads
#46
There is no formal comparison of the stock PCCB pads vs RSC1s I have come across. I sell alot of these and feedback has been very good and pretty much unanimous across the board, the new OE pads just aren't that good. RSC1 is a great dual-use pad and is better in virtually every way. Noiseless and dustless on the street, and as I have said before, lap record capable on track. To avoid any confusion, RSC1 is for ceramic discs, not irons. I have heard pros and cons on the Manthey pads, but based on everything I still think RSC1 is the best pad as it is readily available and performs well. RSC1 is also our go-to pad with the Surface Transforms ceramic discs we import, and all of my customers have been very pleased with it. For those that are track only the RS29 or RSL1 is also recommended.
#47
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
No, I have been told they are different, and if I recall the Mathey pads are harsher on rotors as well. I'm guessing it is more of a cross between RSC2 and RSC3, which are aggressive, but can't say for certain. This also doesn't account for any changes they have made to the compound more recently (if any).
__________________
-Rick
HINZ MOTORSPORT
Race Parts & Accessories for your PORSCHE
www.HinzMotorsport.com
Call: 414-212-5679
Email: rick@hinzmotorsport.com
-Rick
HINZ MOTORSPORT
Race Parts & Accessories for your PORSCHE
www.HinzMotorsport.com
Call: 414-212-5679
Email: rick@hinzmotorsport.com
The following users liked this post:
saksride (10-21-2023)
#48
No, I have been told they are different, and if I recall the Mathey pads are harsher on rotors as well. I'm guessing it is more of a cross between RSC2 and RSC3, which are aggressive, but can't say for certain. This also doesn't account for any changes they have made to the compound more recently (if any).
#49
If anyone ends up running Manthey pads and Pagid RSC1 pads, please post your comparison.
The following users liked this post:
TRAKCAR (10-21-2023)
#50
There is no formal comparison of the stock PCCB pads vs RSC1s I have come across. I sell alot of these and feedback has been very good and pretty much unanimous across the board, the new OE pads just aren't that good. RSC1 is a great dual-use pad and is better in virtually every way. Noiseless and dustless on the street, and as I have said before, lap record capable on track. To avoid any confusion, RSC1 is for ceramic discs, not irons. I have heard pros and cons on the Manthey pads, but based on everything I still think RSC1 is the best pad as it is readily available and performs well. RSC1 is also our go-to pad with the Surface Transforms ceramic discs we import, and all of my customers have been very pleased with it. For those that are track only the RS29 or RSL1 is also recommended.
#51
Advanced
There is no formal comparison of the stock PCCB pads vs RSC1s I have come across. I sell alot of these and feedback has been very good and pretty much unanimous across the board, the new OE pads just aren't that good. RSC1 is a great dual-use pad and is better in virtually every way. Noiseless and dustless on the street, and as I have said before, lap record capable on track. To avoid any confusion, RSC1 is for ceramic discs, not irons. I have heard pros and cons on the Manthey pads, but based on everything I still think RSC1 is the best pad as it is readily available and performs well. RSC1 is also our go-to pad with the Surface Transforms ceramic discs we import, and all of my customers have been very pleased with it. For those that are track only the RS29 or RSL1 is also recommended.
Can't wait for mine!
Rick at Hinz is Awesome.
Bought ST set up with the RS29's.
Club on 10/28... can't wait to see what diff is from what I got.
Current
Steel Stock rotors
Ferodo DS3.12 all around
Endless Fluid
So much better than stock pads, stock definitely glaze over, only took 1 track day on stock pads even with fluid change.
But I can say this about set up, handled some serious braking and times on Glen and Palmer.
The following users liked this post:
Hinz Motorsport (10-18-2023)
#52
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
As far as weight savings go, switching to Iron discs will never be lighter than ceramic discs. I don't have all of the weights for the AP kit in front of me, but if we compare a 992 GT3 AP Racing 380mm iron rear disc that I have in stock with a 992 GT3 Surface Transforms 380mm ceramic rear disc (which now mimics or sizes) you have as follows:
Iron
Stock 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.9 lbs
AP Racing 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.5 lbs
PFC 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Disc: 20.5 lbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceramics
Surface Transforms 380mm Carbon Ceramic (Iron Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 11.4 lbs
Surface Transforms 390mm Carbon Ceramic (PCCB Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 12.5 lbs
Factory 390mm Rear PCCB Disc: 14 lbs
As you can see, the ceramic discs are significantly lighter than their iron counterparts. On a 992 GT3/RS with iron discs, you are looking at saving nearly 45 lbs of unsprung, rotating mass by switching to STs. The AP or PFC kits do gain some of that back as their calipers are about 3 lbs lighter per corner, which is unsprung mass, (but not rotating). There are many reasons to switch to an AP or PFC kit in lieu of PCCBs, but weight savings will not be one of them.
Performance-wise, upgrading to an AP/Essex kit or a PFC kit can have numerous benefits. For starters, if you spring for the Wider CP9668 caliper which can house 25mm thick pads, your pad life will increase significantly thus dropping your consumeable costs. The AP and PFC calipers are also much stiffer than the factory calipers, which help apply more even pressure across the disc surface, reducing localized thermal stress. Your brakes will be much more consistent from the first lap to the last. You also open up your wheel and tire options nicely, if you want to drop down to a 19" wheel. Your brakes will also run much cooler than stock.
That said, this is all relatively generic information, and every situation is different. If you can expand a bit further on what your goals and needs are for your brakes, I can try and identify the best solution for you. Ceramics might be better suited for you, or perhaps a BBK makes more sense. Or maybe you are fine and just need new pads! There are so many variables that go into this decision. Feel free to contact me (or reply here) and we can chat at length!
The following users liked this post:
aap1 (04-21-2024)
#53
This depends on your usage and what you value most. If you don't care about noise or copious amounts of dust, then switching to iron isn't a bad option if you are tracking heavily. New PCCBs are much better than they used to be, so some track use is totally okay. Do you need to run smaller wheels/tires? Do you not like the brake feel? Do you want to keep your PCCBs minty fresh for resale? It all factors into the decision process.
As far as weight savings go, switching to Iron discs will never be lighter than ceramic discs. I don't have all of the weights for the AP kit in front of me, but if we compare a 992 GT3 AP Racing 380mm iron rear disc that I have in stock with a 992 GT3 Surface Transforms 380mm ceramic rear disc (which now mimics or sizes) you have as follows:
Iron
Stock 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.9 lbs
AP Racing 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.5 lbs
PFC 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Disc: 20.5 lbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceramics
Surface Transforms 380mm Carbon Ceramic (Iron Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 11.4 lbs
Surface Transforms 390mm Carbon Ceramic (PCCB Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 12.5 lbs
Factory 390mm Rear PCCB Disc: 14 lbs
As you can see, the ceramic discs are significantly lighter than their iron counterparts. On a 992 GT3/RS with iron discs, you are looking at saving nearly 45 lbs of unsprung, rotating mass by switching to STs. The AP or PFC kits do gain some of that back as their calipers are about 3 lbs lighter per corner, which is unsprung mass, (but not rotating). There are many reasons to switch to an AP or PFC kit in lieu of PCCBs, but weight savings will not be one of them.
Performance-wise, upgrading to an AP/Essex kit or a PFC kit can have numerous benefits. For starters, if you spring for the Wider CP9668 caliper which can house 25mm thick pads, your pad life will increase significantly thus dropping your consumeable costs. The AP and PFC calipers are also much stiffer than the factory calipers, which help apply more even pressure across the disc surface, reducing localized thermal stress. Your brakes will be much more consistent from the first lap to the last. You also open up your wheel and tire options nicely, if you want to drop down to a 19" wheel. Your brakes will also run much cooler than stock.
That said, this is all relatively generic information, and every situation is different. If you can expand a bit further on what your goals and needs are for your brakes, I can try and identify the best solution for you. Ceramics might be better suited for you, or perhaps a BBK makes more sense. Or maybe you are fine and just need new pads! There are so many variables that go into this decision. Feel free to contact me (or reply here) and we can chat at length!
As far as weight savings go, switching to Iron discs will never be lighter than ceramic discs. I don't have all of the weights for the AP kit in front of me, but if we compare a 992 GT3 AP Racing 380mm iron rear disc that I have in stock with a 992 GT3 Surface Transforms 380mm ceramic rear disc (which now mimics or sizes) you have as follows:
Iron
Stock 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.9 lbs
AP Racing 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.5 lbs
PFC 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Disc: 20.5 lbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceramics
Surface Transforms 380mm Carbon Ceramic (Iron Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 11.4 lbs
Surface Transforms 390mm Carbon Ceramic (PCCB Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 12.5 lbs
Factory 390mm Rear PCCB Disc: 14 lbs
As you can see, the ceramic discs are significantly lighter than their iron counterparts. On a 992 GT3/RS with iron discs, you are looking at saving nearly 45 lbs of unsprung, rotating mass by switching to STs. The AP or PFC kits do gain some of that back as their calipers are about 3 lbs lighter per corner, which is unsprung mass, (but not rotating). There are many reasons to switch to an AP or PFC kit in lieu of PCCBs, but weight savings will not be one of them.
Performance-wise, upgrading to an AP/Essex kit or a PFC kit can have numerous benefits. For starters, if you spring for the Wider CP9668 caliper which can house 25mm thick pads, your pad life will increase significantly thus dropping your consumeable costs. The AP and PFC calipers are also much stiffer than the factory calipers, which help apply more even pressure across the disc surface, reducing localized thermal stress. Your brakes will be much more consistent from the first lap to the last. You also open up your wheel and tire options nicely, if you want to drop down to a 19" wheel. Your brakes will also run much cooler than stock.
That said, this is all relatively generic information, and every situation is different. If you can expand a bit further on what your goals and needs are for your brakes, I can try and identify the best solution for you. Ceramics might be better suited for you, or perhaps a BBK makes more sense. Or maybe you are fine and just need new pads! There are so many variables that go into this decision. Feel free to contact me (or reply here) and we can chat at length!
The following 2 users liked this post by lockie:
Hinz Motorsport (10-23-2023),
saksride (10-21-2023)
#54
Rennlist Member
Ceramic brakes do more for laptime than the WP I’m guessing.
Planning to put PCCB and stock pads on the shelve and run ST rotors, RSC1 and SRF.
Planning to put PCCB and stock pads on the shelve and run ST rotors, RSC1 and SRF.
Last edited by TRAKCAR; 10-21-2023 at 10:42 AM.
The following 2 users liked this post by TRAKCAR:
Hinz Motorsport (10-23-2023),
saksride (10-21-2023)
#55
#56
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
1. Liking the Yellow calipers
2. Can sell rotors for more than option price
I guess the abs tuning may suit the ST rotors better too.
Last edited by GrantG; 10-21-2023 at 06:16 PM.
#57
Rennlist Member
My first Porsche with ceramics, all previous ones I optioned the reds. To me the PCCB feel less analog - stronger initial bite but less depth in a way. Hard to describe. Haven't pushed on track super hard yet but might find some irons. (And I even missed one of Grants benefits with black calipers!)
Last edited by signes; 10-21-2023 at 09:36 PM.
#58
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
My first Porsche with ceramics, all previous ones I optioned the reds. To me the PCCB feel less analog - stronger initial bite but less depth in a way. Hard to describe. Haven't pushed on track super hard yet but might find some irons. (And I even missed one of Grants benefits with black calipers!)
#59
This depends on your usage and what you value most. If you don't care about noise or copious amounts of dust, then switching to iron isn't a bad option if you are tracking heavily. New PCCBs are much better than they used to be, so some track use is totally okay. Do you need to run smaller wheels/tires? Do you not like the brake feel? Do you want to keep your PCCBs minty fresh for resale? It all factors into the decision process.
As far as weight savings go, switching to Iron discs will never be lighter than ceramic discs. I don't have all of the weights for the AP kit in front of me, but if we compare a 992 GT3 AP Racing 380mm iron rear disc that I have in stock with a 992 GT3 Surface Transforms 380mm ceramic rear disc (which now mimics or sizes) you have as follows:
Iron
Stock 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.9 lbs
AP Racing 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.5 lbs
PFC 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Disc: 20.5 lbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceramics
Surface Transforms 380mm Carbon Ceramic (Iron Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 11.4 lbs
Surface Transforms 390mm Carbon Ceramic (PCCB Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 12.5 lbs
Factory 390mm Rear PCCB Disc: 14 lbs
As you can see, the ceramic discs are significantly lighter than their iron counterparts. On a 992 GT3/RS with iron discs, you are looking at saving nearly 45 lbs of unsprung, rotating mass by switching to STs. The AP or PFC kits do gain some of that back as their calipers are about 3 lbs lighter per corner, which is unsprung mass, (but not rotating). There are many reasons to switch to an AP or PFC kit in lieu of PCCBs, but weight savings will not be one of them.
Performance-wise, upgrading to an AP/Essex kit or a PFC kit can have numerous benefits. For starters, if you spring for the Wider CP9668 caliper which can house 25mm thick pads, your pad life will increase significantly thus dropping your consumeable costs. The AP and PFC calipers are also much stiffer than the factory calipers, which help apply more even pressure across the disc surface, reducing localized thermal stress. Your brakes will be much more consistent from the first lap to the last. You also open up your wheel and tire options nicely, if you want to drop down to a 19" wheel. Your brakes will also run much cooler than stock.
That said, this is all relatively generic information, and every situation is different. If you can expand a bit further on what your goals and needs are for your brakes, I can try and identify the best solution for you. Ceramics might be better suited for you, or perhaps a BBK makes more sense. Or maybe you are fine and just need new pads! There are so many variables that go into this decision. Feel free to contact me (or reply here) and we can chat at length!
As far as weight savings go, switching to Iron discs will never be lighter than ceramic discs. I don't have all of the weights for the AP kit in front of me, but if we compare a 992 GT3 AP Racing 380mm iron rear disc that I have in stock with a 992 GT3 Surface Transforms 380mm ceramic rear disc (which now mimics or sizes) you have as follows:
Iron
Stock 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.9 lbs
AP Racing 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Rear: 23.5 lbs
PFC 380mm 992 GT3 Iron Disc: 20.5 lbs
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ceramics
Surface Transforms 380mm Carbon Ceramic (Iron Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 11.4 lbs
Surface Transforms 390mm Carbon Ceramic (PCCB Replacement) 992 GT3 Rear: 12.5 lbs
Factory 390mm Rear PCCB Disc: 14 lbs
As you can see, the ceramic discs are significantly lighter than their iron counterparts. On a 992 GT3/RS with iron discs, you are looking at saving nearly 45 lbs of unsprung, rotating mass by switching to STs. The AP or PFC kits do gain some of that back as their calipers are about 3 lbs lighter per corner, which is unsprung mass, (but not rotating). There are many reasons to switch to an AP or PFC kit in lieu of PCCBs, but weight savings will not be one of them.
Performance-wise, upgrading to an AP/Essex kit or a PFC kit can have numerous benefits. For starters, if you spring for the Wider CP9668 caliper which can house 25mm thick pads, your pad life will increase significantly thus dropping your consumeable costs. The AP and PFC calipers are also much stiffer than the factory calipers, which help apply more even pressure across the disc surface, reducing localized thermal stress. Your brakes will be much more consistent from the first lap to the last. You also open up your wheel and tire options nicely, if you want to drop down to a 19" wheel. Your brakes will also run much cooler than stock.
That said, this is all relatively generic information, and every situation is different. If you can expand a bit further on what your goals and needs are for your brakes, I can try and identify the best solution for you. Ceramics might be better suited for you, or perhaps a BBK makes more sense. Or maybe you are fine and just need new pads! There are so many variables that go into this decision. Feel free to contact me (or reply here) and we can chat at length!
#60
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Also of note and not clearly mentioned above, our AP Racing by Essex front and rear iron system saves approximately 30 lbs. vs. the OEM iron system. While it isn't quite as lightweight as carbon ceramic discs, it does offer a huge range of other benefits, and is as close as one can get to the AP Racing Radi-CAL brake systems that were run/will be run on the Porsche factory racecars such as the 911 RSR, GT3 R, etc.
If anyone is able to let us borrow their 992 GT3RS to measure at our Charlotte, NC facility, we would show our appreciation.
__________________
'09 Carrera 2S, '08 Boxster LE (orange), '91 Acura NSX, Tesla Model 3 Performance, Fiesta ST
Jeff Ritter
Mgr. High Performance Division, Essex Parts Services
Essex Designed AP Racing Radi-CAL Competition Brake Kits & 2-piece J Hook Discs
Ferodo Racing Brake Pads
Spiegler Stainless Steel Brake Lines
704-824-6030
jeff.ritter@essexparts.com
'09 Carrera 2S, '08 Boxster LE (orange), '91 Acura NSX, Tesla Model 3 Performance, Fiesta ST
Jeff Ritter
Mgr. High Performance Division, Essex Parts Services
Essex Designed AP Racing Radi-CAL Competition Brake Kits & 2-piece J Hook Discs
Ferodo Racing Brake Pads
Spiegler Stainless Steel Brake Lines
704-824-6030
jeff.ritter@essexparts.com
The following users liked this post:
lockie (10-23-2023)