Notices
992 GT3 and GT2RS Forum 2019-Current
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Johannes Van Overbeek - GT3T Driving Impressions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2022, 03:57 AM
  #16  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,457
Received 5,736 Likes on 2,347 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spyerx
HHAHA yes. The tree root with the paint marks? Scary.
no, the tree root only has issue with CGT.
all other cars fly over it fine.
it will go airborne but will not twitch when landed unlike CGT.
992 is very easy to go fast...
it def has many issues, but strangely they don't bother me.. and you know I usually get very irritated with tiny issues.

Old 09-10-2022, 05:32 AM
  #17  
Taffy66
Burning Brakes
 
Taffy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 851
Received 462 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Chris Harris when test drove a 992GT3 Touring on some bumpy UK roads said exactly the same thing. In his video he makes a strong specific point on the 992 Touring being underdamped and oversprung just like what JVO said. Another well known and very reputable UK guy Harry Metcalfe said exactly the same thing when he drove a 992 GT3 on similar bumpy UK roads.
So we have three highly reputable experienced motoring journalists say the same thing in that the 992GT3 is under damped/oversprung. Pretty much conclusive IMO.
Old 09-10-2022, 06:50 AM
  #18  
Jbravo23
Rennlist Member
 
Jbravo23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Boston
Posts: 1,738
Received 1,777 Likes on 721 Posts
Default

CH mentioned it was at low speeds around town. Once you’re moving he said it’s actually more comfortable than his 991.2 touring.

I tend to agree with that take. I avoid city driving as much as I can. Also did with my 991.2. GT Cars aren’t designed for low speed city driving. TTS would suit that situation better
The following 2 users liked this post by Jbravo23:
AlexCeres (08-03-2023), user 9973849 (09-11-2022)
Old 09-11-2022, 10:43 AM
  #19  
bluehorseshoe
Rennlist Member
 
bluehorseshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 1,767
Received 445 Likes on 179 Posts
Default

I'm obviously not capable of pushing the car to his levels but his comments are not my experience. Perhaps there's something wrong with his car.
Old 09-11-2022, 11:07 AM
  #20  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,654
Received 955 Likes on 552 Posts
Default

Let's see how the next gen tuning on the RS is. Seems likely that the wishbone setup is so new Porsche is learning how to make it work in all situations. On the track, it feels great, even soft. In hard corners around town it also feels smooth, even over a very rough surface. In a straight line at medium speeds, it's bouncy and clearly underdamped. I'd bet the RS and .2 will be vastly improved in bandwidth, just like the 991.2RS was vastly improved over the .1RS.
The following users liked this post:
paradocs98 (09-11-2022)
Old 09-11-2022, 11:51 AM
  #21  
Rod27
Pro
 
Rod27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Posts: 748
Received 221 Likes on 160 Posts
Default

Laughable that he wouldn’t consider tire pressures
The following users liked this post:
speedyj (09-12-2022)
Old 09-11-2022, 12:14 PM
  #22  
Bucketlistx911
Rennlist Member
 
Bucketlistx911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 287
Received 320 Likes on 115 Posts
Default

Just returned from one of my Sunday morning country road drives. It is a quiet agricultural area, lo to no traffic, lot of curves and shape. I was in sport mode and driving at the “fun” speed. Great fun indeed, however there is a section of road that is very irregular, pavement good but it is lumpy and bumpy. So I transition from ideal road to this section and he car starts jumping and pitching. I am using the full road and cheating in the middle. I had to back off or risk a lurch to the shoulder and trouble. Yes the suspension is very hard sprung. My 991.1 GT3 was more compliant and would better absorb the type of road irregularity. Sure I was going at a frisky speed but it got ready to bounce right off the pavement and I was working the wheel more white knuckle than track driving. I make no complaint as I like the suspension set up and especially the front end steering action. I know the limit and back off when the over sprung condition is trouble. So I understand what the Brit journalist are saying as my country road is in the same nature. So let’s say you could go 90+ but you better hold it to 65-70 or have a hop into the bushes.
The following users liked this post:
michaeldorian (08-03-2023)
Old 09-11-2022, 12:27 PM
  #23  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,133
Received 5,075 Likes on 2,861 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rod27
Laughable that he wouldn’t consider tire pressures
He may have considered the pressures and saw that they match the pressure recommendation on the door jamb. But it’s perfectly reasonable to question whether he saw the 5 psi lower recommendations buried in the Owner’s Manual for “Performance “ driving.

Also, the tire pressure gauge on the dashboard typical reads 2 psi lower than actual pressure, in my experience (so actual pressures 7 psi higher than Performance recommendations - which is enormous difference).

Last edited by GrantG; 09-11-2022 at 03:46 PM.
The following 4 users liked this post by GrantG:
AlexCeres (09-11-2022), Diablo Dude (01-12-2023), GT3Laguna (09-12-2022), paradocs98 (09-11-2022)
Old 09-11-2022, 03:15 PM
  #24  
colnagoG60
Rennlist Member
 
colnagoG60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2019
Location: Balt/DC
Posts: 2,704
Received 1,282 Likes on 802 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jbravo23
CH mentioned it was at low speeds around town. Once you’re moving he said it’s actually more comfortable than his 991.2 touring...
There are PASM parameters which can alleviate that behavior...again, its a question of whether or not the appled settings for said behavior(s) is implemented. The speed at which one is moving where the car is more comfortable can be set.
Old 09-11-2022, 03:31 PM
  #25  
Taffy66
Burning Brakes
 
Taffy66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Posts: 851
Received 462 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

The trouble is the Touring uses the exact same spring rates as the winged GT3. At certain speeds driving in a straight line over heavily cambered, rough and bumpy roads the car feels underdamped in relation to the increased spring rates. No issues on race tracks or smooth roads. I wonder if Porsche have changed the dampers on the new 992RS since the spring rates are 50% more again compared to the GT3. Matching spring rates to dampers is a black art especially electronic variable ones. Better off using the Manthey KW 3/4 ways IMO
Old 09-11-2022, 03:37 PM
  #26  
RUF RS
Burning Brakes
 
RUF RS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 794
Received 320 Likes on 161 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taffy66
The trouble is the Touring uses the exact same spring rates as the winged GT3.
I believe that this is a huge part of the issue. Many ordered the Touring thinking that it was more of a 'comfortable daily driver' then it's winged counterpart. But it's really the exact same car in every way, sans wing.....so maybe expectations are an issue here....

A Speedster it is NOT.....
Old 09-11-2022, 03:59 PM
  #27  
TRZ06
Rennlist Member
 
TRZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 3,001
Received 1,645 Likes on 934 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Taffy66
The trouble is the Touring uses the exact same spring rates as the winged GT3. At certain speeds driving in a straight line over heavily cambered, rough and bumpy roads the car feels underdamped in relation to the increased spring rates. No issues on race tracks or smooth roads. I wonder if Porsche have changed the dampers on the new 992RS since the spring rates are 50% more again compared to the GT3. Matching spring rates to dampers is a black art especially electronic variable ones. Better off using the Manthey KW 3/4 ways IMO

I might get flamed for this but....

IMO, I think Porsche is losing its edge in the suspension/damping game. Similar to how at one time BMW was the Ultimate Driving Machine, it has not been so for a long time now, yet people still buy into the marketing of it.

I said it earlier, but it is worth repeating, MRC (Magnetic Ride Control) is where it is at technology wise. It allows you to have your cake and eat it too. Similar to BMW, Porsche sets up their cars for smooth roads only and that is where they shine and feel amazing. HOWEVER when the roads turn to crap and the suspension gets a good workout, THIS is where great damping tuning shows. BMW has not had it for a long time now and Porsche is trending in the wrong direction.

I was severely disappointed with my stock 718 GT4 PASM damping.

The following users liked this post:
GT3Laguna (09-12-2022)
Old 09-11-2022, 04:24 PM
  #28  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,133
Received 5,075 Likes on 2,861 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRZ06
I might get flamed for this but....

IMO, I think Porsche is losing its edge in the suspension/damping game. Similar to how at one time BMW was the Ultimate Driving Machine, it has not been so for a long time now, yet people still buy into the marketing of it.

I said it earlier, but it is worth repeating, MRC (Magnetic Ride Control) is where it is at technology wise. It allows you to have your cake and eat it too. Similar to BMW, Porsche sets up their cars for smooth roads only and that is where they shine and feel amazing. HOWEVER when the roads turn to crap and the suspension gets a good workout, THIS is where great damping tuning shows. BMW has not had it for a long time now and Porsche is trending in the wrong direction.

I was severely disappointed with my stock 718 GT4 PASM damping.
I disagree. Porsche builds its GT cars to lap the Nürburgring Nordschleife quickly (among other goals) and that track is anything but smooth. Let’s see an MRC-equipped car lap under 7 minutes for a full lap (without grossly more power than the GT3), before we award the crown to MRC.

Im also interested to see the RS’s time without MRC as well.

Last edited by GrantG; 09-11-2022 at 04:27 PM.
Old 09-11-2022, 04:50 PM
  #29  
Chris C.
Rennlist Member
 
Chris C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Bay Area CA
Posts: 3,165
Received 537 Likes on 282 Posts
Default

Perhaps a DSC tuning will help with low speed harshness? It did on my 991.1
Old 09-11-2022, 05:04 PM
  #30  
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
GrantG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Denver
Posts: 18,133
Received 5,075 Likes on 2,861 Posts
Default

Why have we been promised a C8 Z06 Nürburgring lap time for over a year (and most recently teased 8 months ago) and still no lap?

Surely with 160 hp more and 115 ft-lbs more torque than the GT3 and RS and MRC suspension with Mid-Engine chassis and huge sticky tires, it should be much faster??

So far, 7:12.64 (no mention if short or long version of the lap, but ~13 seconds slower than GT3 even if long lap):

https://gmauthority.com/blog/2021/09...ime-video/amp/


Last edited by GrantG; 09-11-2022 at 05:23 PM.


Quick Reply: Johannes Van Overbeek - GT3T Driving Impressions



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:18 PM.