Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GIAC 991.2 Carrera 4S Tune Review

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-15-2017, 02:50 PM
  #16  
Ira Blumberg
Instructor
 
Ira Blumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JawJuh
Bone stock 2017 Carrera S gets 11.4 seconds @ 123 MPH. Here are the results of instrumented test:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

Carrera 4S is supposed to be 0.1-0.2s faster (11.2 second q-mile) depending on track temperature. GIAC tune seems to be making a miniscule difference at the risk of voiding warranty.


This C&D test says the 4S goes 11.5 @ 121 in the quarter stock: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...4s-test-review


Most people have difficulty matching C&D's times. While I think the trap speed is lower than expected, the 11.1 is a full 0.4 second improvement in E.T. This suggests an increase of at least 40 HP.


Obviously it would have been preferable to have before and after runs on the same day at the same track for the most accurate comparison. Nonetheless, a repeatable 11.1 E.T. is impressive. I would say that is not a miniscule difference and everyone has their own level of risk tolerance.
Old 05-15-2017, 03:57 PM
  #17  
freddiemac
Rennlist Member
 
freddiemac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 15
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Ira, there are too many variables in ET.. The same car can easily be 0.5 secs slower/faster on a colder/hotter day, diff tires/track, etc.. While trap will likely be similar.

Thus the trap speed is always the preferred indicator of actual hp applied.
Old 05-15-2017, 04:16 PM
  #18  
mac10
Racer
Thread Starter
 
mac10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New England
Posts: 307
Received 66 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JawJuh
Bone stock 2017 Carrera S gets 11.4 seconds @ 123 MPH. Here are the results of instrumented test:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

Carrera 4S is supposed to be 0.1-0.2s faster (11.2 second q-mile) depending on track temperature. GIAC tune seems to be making a miniscule difference at the risk of voiding warranty.
Maybe you should read and understand the entire piece, instead of just interpreting part of it to justify your personal rhetoric.

The car ran a consistent 11.1 with my novice hands at the helm and with the wheels spinning during launch control at the start, I feel like the car could break into the 10’s(93 pump gas) on a cleaner surface.
Old 05-15-2017, 05:38 PM
  #19  
9914s
Rennlist Member
 
9914s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wellington FL
Posts: 1,307
Received 254 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Wow lots of internet racers. Magazine times and real life times are not comparable at all. Good job OP.
Old 05-15-2017, 05:38 PM
  #20  
Ira Blumberg
Instructor
 
Ira Blumberg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Camas, WA
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by freddiemac
Ira, there are too many variables in ET.. The same car can easily be 0.5 secs slower/faster on a colder/hotter day, diff tires/track, etc.. While trap will likely be similar.

Thus the trap speed is always the preferred indicator of actual hp applied.


Generally, I agree. However, it is extremely rare to see a novice beat or even equal E.T.s reported by C&D. Thus, in this case, I am willing to accept that the mod did indeed knock about 0.4 seconds off of a very aggressive E.T.


There are many possible explanations for the lower than expected trap speed. For example, the ECU could have been forced to pull timing at the top end in higher gears due to detonation. Perhaps with better gas or less aggressive tuning at the top end, the trap speed would be even higher.
Old 05-15-2017, 09:32 PM
  #21  
P-car fan
Instructor
 
P-car fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 9914s
Wow lots of internet racers. Magazine times and real life times are not comparable at all. Good job OP.
EXACTLY!! And the fact that it was OP's first time at the drag strip is big as well. Anyone commenting in this thread saying that the gains are negligible seriously does not understand real world circumstances!!
Old 05-15-2017, 10:24 PM
  #22  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ira Blumberg
This C&D test says the 4S goes 11.5 @ 121 in the quarter stock: http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...4s-test-review


Most people have difficulty matching C&D's times. While I think the trap speed is lower than expected, the 11.1 is a full 0.4 second improvement in E.T. This suggests an increase of at least 40 HP.


Obviously it would have been preferable to have before and after runs on the same day at the same track for the most accurate comparison. Nonetheless, a repeatable 11.1 E.T. is impressive. I would say that is not a miniscule difference and everyone has their own level of risk tolerance.
Not sure why people don't understand that magazines aren't getting timeslips but using GPS.

That inflates their trap speeds.

The huge ET gain shows a huge torque gain down low. As it so happens, this correlates with the released 991.2 GIAC Carrera tune dyno of +100 lb-t at 3000 rpm.
Old 05-15-2017, 10:25 PM
  #23  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JawJuh
Bone stock 2017 Carrera S gets 11.4 seconds @ 123 MPH. Here are the results of instrumented test:

http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ic-test-review

Carrera 4S is supposed to be 0.1-0.2s faster (11.2 second q-mile) depending on track temperature. GIAC tune seems to be making a miniscule difference at the risk of voiding warranty.
You have no idea what you're talking about.
Old 05-15-2017, 10:26 PM
  #24  
sticky
Banned
 
sticky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Laguna, CA
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator
Yeah I agree with previous comments, that looks like about the right time for a stock .2S to me. I did 12.2 at 117 in my stock .1S with a full second reaction time.
What does reaction time have to do with anything?

Also, please post your slip.
Old 05-16-2017, 12:43 AM
  #25  
mikex25
 
mikex25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sticky
What does reaction time have to do with anything?

Also, please post your slip.
not sure he understands timer starts after you cross the starting line.
Old 05-16-2017, 09:36 AM
  #26  
9914s
Rennlist Member
 
9914s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wellington FL
Posts: 1,307
Received 254 Likes on 139 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator
Yeah I agree with previous comments, that looks like about the right time for a stock .2S to me. I did 12.2 at 117 in my stock .1S with a full second reaction time.
PDK?
Old 05-16-2017, 10:10 AM
  #27  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikex25
not sure he understands timer starts after you cross the starting line.
Hmm are you sure?

Originally Posted by 9914s
PDK?
Yep PDK SC. I'm a bit confused about all the comments of real world conditions and being a first time and everything, especially if as Mike says the timer starts when you cross the line. LC seems more like and amusement park ride than anything else to me. I didn't really do anything.

I'll look for the slip, I'm sure it's in a box somewhere.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:51 AM
  #28  
mikex25
 
mikex25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator
Hmm are you sure?



Yep PDK SC. I'm a bit confused about all the comments of real world conditions and being a first time and everything, especially if as Mike says the timer starts when you cross the line. LC seems more like and amusement park ride than anything else to me. I didn't really do anything.

I'll look for the slip, I'm sure it's in a box somewhere.

it is true after the light turns green you can sit there for as long as you want and the timer won't start until you cross the starting line. Reaction time is only for head to head races.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:54 AM
  #29  
Dewinator
Drifting
 
Dewinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 3,096
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mikex25
it is true at the drag strip after the light turns green you can sit there for as long as you want and the timer won't start until you cross the starting line. Reaction time is only for head to head races.
It was head to head as in there was another car racing next to me if that's what you mean.
Old 05-16-2017, 10:58 AM
  #30  
mikex25
 
mikex25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Northern California
Posts: 395
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dewinator
It was head to head as in there was another car racing next to me if that's what you mean.
http://www.dragbike.com/the-starting-line-how-does-reaction-time-affect-a-runs-et/



please read second paragraph "how does reaction time effect affect ET"


Quick Reply: GIAC 991.2 Carrera 4S Tune Review



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:37 AM.