When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
OK, below is Road & Track's 2017 Performance Car of the Year Review. You've probably already read it. I have enjoyed reading these reviews since I bought my 2012, 991, 911S. Very interesting comparisons by experience people/drivers. But this years review creates a question I'd like your advice on.
The analysis of each car includes a category called "Roadholding." See the insert box of car data on about page 5, second from the bottom row of data. I believe this data reflects lateral acceleration results. The Porsche Turbo S data is listed as 1.07g's.
Here is my question... my car has a lateral acceleration gauge. Last time I was at the Sonoma Raceway for a Track Day I re-set my G-meter gauge to zero prior to the day. When I returned home at the end of the day I checked the max left and right g's from the day: 1.21 and 1.22. How can my measly 911S develop more "Roadhold" than a Turbo S or any of these other cars? Maybe I'm just a really good driver! (Yeah, right!) Well, OK, maybe there is another explanation. But what? Calibration of instruments used? Different measurement?
I believe when they do the tests its on a flat surface, and then drive in a circle until the tires lose traction. On a track you can hit banked turns and such which allows for greater g-force than on a flat surface.