Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 in rain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-20-2016 | 10:56 AM
  #1  
diononiz's Avatar
diononiz
Thread Starter
Instructor
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 190
Likes: 57
From: Mountain View, CA
Default Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 in rain

I was wondering if any you folks who use the Pilot Sport Cup 2s as daily driving tires can share your experiences in the rain. I am also curious to know how the Sport Cup 2s compare to the Michelin Super Sports and Pirelli P Zeros in terms of ride quality and noise on city streets.

I am trying to determine the feasibility of using them as daily tires in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Thanks in advance
Old 10-20-2016 | 11:35 AM
  #2  
Needsdecaf's Avatar
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 8,942
Likes: 2,627
From: The Woodlands, TX.
Default

Unless you track, and aren't switching tires, there is very little reason to go with a Cup tire over something like a PSS. You're just not going to see the benefit on the road, your grip will suffer in deeper water and your wear rate will be much higher.
Old 10-20-2016 | 11:48 AM
  #3  
Jim M.'s Avatar
Jim M.
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,046
Likes: 906
From: DFW Texas
Default

^ +991
Old 10-20-2016 | 12:14 PM
  #4  
Vise's Avatar
Vise
Drifting
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,058
Likes: 334
From: Toronto
Default

I run Sport Cup 2 tires on my daily driver 991 GTS... in fact I drove to work today in the rain and I lived to tell the tale.

From what I gather the Cup 2 is hugely improved in the wet over the original Cup... I actually ran a wet track day in August at Calabogie and was shocked at the grip level on a soaking wet track. The standing water was a bit dicey of course but would be the same for pretty much any tire.

Depending on your driving habits the Cup 2 will work just fine assuming you're looking for the extra grip for the odd track day here and there. They are far, far superior to the stock P-Zeros on the track and street... it is almost night and day to be honest. I'm sure the PSS is excellent as well but I decided to go Cup 2 given I track 8-10 times per year.

Net is I'm super happy with them so far but we'll see what happens when it gets a bit colder this month/next before I swap to my winter tires.
Old 10-20-2016 | 12:25 PM
  #5  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Likes: 3,886
Default

For a pure street car, it makes no sense unless you just like throwing money away.
Old 10-20-2016 | 01:06 PM
  #6  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,836
Likes: 3,642
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf
Unless you track, and aren't switching tires, there is very little reason to go with a Cup tire over something like a PSS. You're just not going to see the benefit on the road, your grip will suffer in deeper water and your wear rate will be much higher.
I totally agree with this assertion... I run the MPSC2 on my GT3 (in the Bay Area) but its primarily a track car...

Originally Posted by Vise
I run Sport Cup 2 tires on my daily driver 991 GTS... in fact I drove to work today in the rain and I lived to tell the tale.

From what I gather the Cup 2 is hugely improved in the wet over the original Cup... I actually ran a wet track day in August at Calabogie and was shocked at the grip level on a soaking wet track. The standing water was a bit dicey of course but would be the same for pretty much any tire.

Depending on your driving habits the Cup 2 will work just fine assuming you're looking for the extra grip for the odd track day here and there. They are far, far superior to the stock P-Zeros on the track and street... it is almost night and day to be honest. I'm sure the PSS is excellent as well but I decided to go Cup 2 given I track 8-10 times per year.

Net is I'm super happy with them so far but we'll see what happens when it gets a bit colder this month/next before I swap to my winter tires.
I also agree with Vise, the MPSC2 and the MPSS are far superior to the
PZERO N0 rubber (which I currently run on my 991 GTS).

I would point out that the MPSS will wear much better than the MPSC2
and will have much better wet (heavy rain/surface water) performance
than the MPSC2.

I would be tempted (if you can get them) to go with the MPSS vs the MPSC2
they will last longer and are a better compromise for street/track use
Old 10-20-2016 | 01:19 PM
  #7  
mikeearly's Avatar
mikeearly
Pro
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 555
Likes: 58
From: Chester VA
Default

At the Porsche Parade this year I was talking to the Michelin Rep at the tire testing venue about this very subject. He told me that if the road was wet with small puddles they would NOT have run the test using Cup 2's. He said they would work OK if the road was damp for the little "autocross" they had set up since the run-out area was pretty wide but they would not risk the cars if there were puddles.
Old 10-20-2016 | 01:23 PM
  #8  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,836
Likes: 3,642
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by mikeearly
At the Porsche Parade this year I was talking to the Michelin Rep at the tire testing venue about this very subject. He told me that if the road was wet with small puddles they would NOT have run the test using Cup 2's. He said they would work OK if the road was damp for the little "autocross" they had set up since the run-out area was pretty wide but they would not risk the cars if there were puddles.
earlier cups were very bad at dealing with standing water - if a few horror
stories about aqua planning disasters!

The E46 M3 CSL required owners to sign a disclaimer regarding the cup wet
performance ...



but I think the 2's are significantly better

having said that I would probably avoid driving on them in situations where
you might encounter standing water...
Old 10-20-2016 | 03:48 PM
  #9  
991carreradriver's Avatar
991carreradriver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 430
From: Northeast
Default

I have gone through two sets of SC2's in six months of driving them to, from and on the track. I have accumulated an average of 35 heat cycles on each. The first set made it 2,824 miles and 35 cycles. The second set made it 3,599 miles (longer track trips) and 36 heat cycles.

My observations on street driving are:
1) Quieter and better ride quality over the PZero
2) Good on wet, non flooded roadway at high speeds. Wet track speeds 90 mph-110 mph with 8 lb. increased inflation over normal track psi.
3) Horrible in heavy rain or standing water. I started to hydroplane at 30 mph on a highway in heavy rain.
4) Tread outlasted the tires ability to maintain grip.

I would not recommend for DD as there are better and more cost effective tires for DD.
Old 10-20-2016 | 05:46 PM
  #10  
LexVan's Avatar
LexVan
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 26,141
Likes: 5,418
From: Chicagoland Area
Default

Originally Posted by 991carreradriver
I have gone through two sets of SC2's in six months of driving them to, from and on the track. I have accumulated an average of 35 heat cycles on each. The first set made it 2,824 miles and 35 cycles. The second set made it 3,599 miles (longer track trips) and 36 heat cycles.

My observations on street driving are:
1) Quieter and better ride quality over the PZero
2) Good on wet, non flooded roadway at high speeds. Wet track speeds 90 mph-110 mph with 8 lb. increased inflation over normal track psi.
3) Horrible in heavy rain or standing water. I started to hydroplane at 30 mph on a highway in heavy rain.
4) Tread outlasted the tires ability to maintain grip.

I would not recommend for DD as there are better and more cost effective tires for DD.
Great answer, Frank. You just saved the OP +$2,000.
Old 10-20-2016 | 08:58 PM
  #11  
Jabs1542's Avatar
Jabs1542
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,141
Likes: 153
From: Northern VA and Central FL
Default

Originally Posted by 991carreradriver
I have gone through two sets of SC2's in six months of driving them to, from and on the track. I have accumulated an average of 35 heat cycles on each. The first set made it 2,824 miles and 35 cycles. The second set made it 3,599 miles (longer track trips) and 36 heat cycles.

My observations on street driving are:
1) Quieter and better ride quality over the PZero
2) Good on wet, non flooded roadway at high speeds. Wet track speeds 90 mph-110 mph with 8 lb. increased inflation over normal track psi.
3) Horrible in heavy rain or standing water. I started to hydroplane at 30 mph on a highway in heavy rain.
4) Tread outlasted the tires ability to maintain grip.

I would not recommend for DD as there are better and more cost effective tires for DD.
Frank - you replaced based on heat cycle and not wear? Where did you derive your 35 cycle number? Or did you wait until the tires were greasy at all times (no additional grip after warm up)? I'm still getting pretty good life out of MPSS and am curious what I would be getting into if I switched to the SC2s. I suspect better grip for a shorter life.

TIA
Old 10-20-2016 | 11:13 PM
  #12  
991carreradriver's Avatar
991carreradriver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,156
Likes: 430
From: Northeast
Default

Originally Posted by Jabs1542
Frank - you replaced based on heat cycle and not wear? Where did you derive your 35 cycle number? Or did you wait until the tires were greasy at all times (no additional grip after warm up)? I'm still getting pretty good life out of MPSS and am curious what I would be getting into if I switched to the SC2s. I suspect better grip for a shorter life.

TIA
Neither, the tires get retired when I can no longer maintain consistent grip on the same track and corners at the same speeds with the same temperatures. Its not that they get greasy. In fact, I have never experienced SP2's getting greasy as I am very diligent at maintaining pressures so they don't overheat. Heat cycles are derived by counting how many times they are brought up to temperature and then allowed to cool. That counts as 1 cycle. Since the SPC2's are a dual compound tire, they cannot heat and cool indefinitely. They simply start to break down and lose grip.
I am sure I could continue to use as street tires after track use, but for the reasons I previously stated there are much better street tire solutions. Plus I don't have room to store more than two sets of tires at a time. My car is 1 year old and the original Pzero's have about 600 miles on them as I use Sottozero's for the winter just to exercise the car during the winter.
Old 10-21-2016 | 06:16 AM
  #13  
Karl911's Avatar
Karl911
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,048
Likes: 433
From: S. Fl.
Default

Originally Posted by diononiz
I was wondering if any you folks who use the Pilot Sport Cup 2s as daily driving tires can share your experiences in the rain. I am also curious to know how the Sport Cup 2s compare to the Michelin Super Sports and Pirelli P Zeros in terms of ride quality and noise on city streets.

I am trying to determine the feasibility of using them as daily tires in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Thanks in advance
Your driving a AWD TTS, driving with MSC2s in rain is not a big issue.
With MSC2s your ride is better because you should run tire pressures 34/36.
Otherwise, Run PSS for best all around life / performance.
I actually run 265/325 MSC2 DD/TRACK. Ride is fantastic
Old 10-21-2016 | 09:28 AM
  #14  
R_Rated's Avatar
R_Rated
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 42
From: Where aspirations are natural
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf
Unless you track, and aren't switching tires, there is very little reason to go with a Cup tire over something like a PSS. You're just not going to see the benefit on the road, your grip will suffer in deeper water and your wear rate will be much higher.
The cup tires will be unsafe in the rain, especially with the SF hills and crappy roads. Also, it gets cold in some areas and this will also cause concerns untill the rubber gets a little heat.
Old 10-21-2016 | 09:34 AM
  #15  
R_Rated's Avatar
R_Rated
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 4,389
Likes: 42
From: Where aspirations are natural
Default

Originally Posted by Karl911
Your driving a AWD TTS, driving with MSC2s in rain is not a big issue.
With MSC2s your ride is better because you should run tire pressures 34/36.
Otherwise, Run PSS for best all around life / performance.
I actually run 265/325 MSC2 DD/TRACK. Ride is fantastic
AWD does nothing for hydroplaning or stopping.


Quick Reply: Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 in rain



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:54 AM.