Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 Race Track Drivers - PSM On or Off?

Old 12-10-2013, 08:12 AM
  #16  
CBejbl
Rennlist Member
 
CBejbl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,560
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

As I have to drive the car home at the end of the day, PSM stays on.
Old 12-10-2013, 10:29 AM
  #17  
mtbscott
Burning Brakes
 
mtbscott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 820
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

A bit of a threadjack, but a few years back, our local group was invited to brand new facility (H2R in San Marcos) for an all Cayman day to drum up some business. Since this was basically an exhibition day, the three rules were PSM on, NO passing, and if you run off the track you're out for the day.
It was my first time to drive the 987 Cayman S on the track, but my "old school" thinking was how could I possibly go fast with the pesky PSM on? Well...granted we were probably only running 7/10's that day but my PSM light never came on! I think in general, Porsche's systems are more of a safety net than nanny compared to those of other marques. The only time I've seen the light flash on my 991 on the street was very briefly in some wet conditions. If and when I get the 991 to the track, I'll leave it on until I absolutely feel it's holding me back.
Old 12-10-2013, 02:16 PM
  #18  
paradocs98
Rennlist Member
 
paradocs98's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 1,744
Received 367 Likes on 171 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BGB Motorsports
Sorry for the delay. Yesterday was pretty hectic with us finishing up the 981 roll hoops and moving onto the 991.

I wanted to get back to you though because you want to order tires. No apologies for thread-jacking. I'm here only to help so, let's see if I can.

I failed to look at tire math last night but I would think that if you went to a 19" tire with the same rollout, just like you identified, you will be fine. As I think about it, the 19s I was on were fairly low profile. I don't think you can ruin the cars handling with more sidewall as much as you can hurt it without running enough. I think you are spot on as to why the car felt different. It drove like a car in the wet with too much sway bar. It felt too stiff because I had shot the relative spring rate of the tire through the moon by changing the profile. It needed more compliance in the wet, which is why we run soft springs and bars when it's wet.

I see so many people with 20" wheels and tires and a "ride" or "balance" that sucks because they don't keep the big sidewall. I don't think I would be concerned about adding sidewall as much as I would be concerned about not providing enough.

Make sense? And thanks for finally helping me understand why that went down like it did. Sometimes some mild discussion can shed light.

Cheers!
Interesting dilemma--the typical situation is "upgrading" from a smaller wheel to a larger one, and running a correspondingly shorter tire sidewall to maintain overall diameter. Here Porsche is forcing us to go in the opposite direction, downsizing from 20" to 19" for a practical track setup. I would think that, by maintaining the same overall wheel/tire diameter in the form of a higher aspect ratio, the taller sidewall would potentially lead to sloppier handling, all other things being equal. Is this the case?

The way to avoid this, of course, with a 19" setup is to just maintain the stock tire aspect ratios, and run an overall smaller diameter wheel/tire setup.

You say that people run into more trouble by going too low on the aspect ratio/sidewall height. But if Porsche did their chassis design/tuning around 20" wheel/tire combo with a 35-series aspect ratio, wouldn't it seem to make sense to maintain that 35-series ratio, only in a smaller overall diameter 19" setup?

Here are the calculations for the sidewall height--in order to maintain the overall diameter of the wheel/tire package when going down to a 19" setup, the sidewall increases by about 0.5":

Front
Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference
245/35-20 3.4in 13.4in 26.8in 84.0in 754 0.0%
255/40-19 4.0in 13.5in 27.0in 84.9in 746 1.0%
255/35-19 3.5in 13.0in 26.0in 81.8in 775 -2.7%

Rear
Specification Sidewall Radius Diameter Circumference Revs/Mile Difference
295/30-20 3.5in 13.5in 27.0in 84.7in 748 0.0%
295/35-19 4.1in 13.6in 27.1in 85.2in 743 0.6%
305/30-19 3.6in 13.1in 26.2in 82.3in 770 -2.8%

Thanks a lot for your comments--great to have a voice of knowledge from the business/industry on here.
Old 12-10-2013, 07:04 PM
  #19  
MayorAdamWest
Three Wheelin'
 
MayorAdamWest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,299
Received 19 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I run the smaller diameter with the 19"s and it runs quite nice. I haven't tried it on a track in the rain, but on the track in the dry I really don't notice any difference other than my pocket having some more money it from not having to buy 20" track tires.
Old 12-10-2013, 07:25 PM
  #20  
008
Rennlist Member
 
008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,019
Received 53 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Mayor West, can you please post your tire and wheel specs? Brands, sizes, etc. This is the first car I've purchased where getting a track setup that works and is "relatively" price efficient per session is such a pita. Thanks
Old 12-13-2013, 08:07 AM
  #21  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 590 Likes on 260 Posts
Default

Guys,

Don't get lost in the "analysis paralysis." Regardless of how the suspension was tested or designed, if minor changes in sidewall radically changed the handling, then they would have 1 spec 20" for the car. There is no way the Pirelli and the Michelin have the same relative spring rate. Different tires will affect the car differently.


Just don't set the car up on 19" low profile rubber bands.
Old 05-23-2015, 10:29 PM
  #22  
bccars
Three Wheelin'
 
bccars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Europe
Posts: 1,416
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hudyman
The other major problem with not being able to defeat PSM completely is - using stock OEM brake pads is like throwing money in the fireplace. With PSM off I can barely get 2 days out of a set of OEM rear pads. Front pads are fine, but rear pads are toast after two days on track. The pads disintegrate into the rotor and cause a warped rotor feel upon heavy braking because their is so much material stuck in the rotor. The OEM pads are absolute garbage at high temperatures because the ABD is constantly engaging the rear pads when detecting the slightest slip.
I did a trackday with psm on in my stock 991 c2. Exactly the same problem you describe. Brakepads are virtually gone. Holes in the rotors were completely filled up with break dust. Now there is enormous vibration on the brakes. Allready blew the brake dust out, to no avail. Dealer says they are blue and warped from overheating. Also suggest to drive with PSM off, but I'm not comfortable with that.
Old 05-24-2015, 12:09 PM
  #23  
008
Rennlist Member
 
008's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,019
Received 53 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

The rotors are likely not warped, but have pad material deposits. Should go away after a few days of street driving. Stock Rear pads will be gone after 2-3 track days whether you leave PSM off or on because of the torque vectoring "feature". Yes it works very well but makes track days that much more expensive. I shudder to think what running a diffless McLaren regularly on the track costs.
Old 05-25-2015, 10:27 AM
  #24  
Team Plutonium
Drifting
 
Team Plutonium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Upstate, NY
Posts: 3,357
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

I leave the PSM on as well.
Old 05-25-2015, 11:35 AM
  #25  
DD GT3 RD
Rennlist Member
 
DD GT3 RD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,254
Received 442 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Off.
Old 05-25-2015, 09:50 PM
  #26  
2013991black7sp
Track Day
 
2013991black7sp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On and have never had a problem. 3 DEs on a set of pads.
Old 05-25-2015, 10:15 PM
  #27  
WCE
User
 
WCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 992
Received 176 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Individual DE driving styles vary greatly. I've had instructors obviously annoyed that I wasn't pushing my car at full throttle all the way down the straights right up to the point I'd have to jump on the brakes into ABS. It would not take too many laps driving like this or even worse, over driving the car to burn through a set of tires and brakes.
A far as tire sizes, along with the new larger overall tire diameters, Porsche has optimized the 991 suspension to handle 19's and 20's pretty much equally well. The choice of what to use is ours to enjoy and becomes a matter of personal preference.
Old 05-26-2015, 07:47 AM
  #28  
Slantnose!
Rennlist Member
 
Slantnose!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 2,320
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Regarding 18's, aren't most of the 991 GT3 folks running those?
Is our rear suspension different than theirs?
Been sort-of considering an autocross set-up & would make a huge different if could run some A7's in 18's vs. 19 or 20's.
Old 05-27-2015, 10:11 AM
  #29  
Tom Tweed
Addict
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Tom Tweed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: La Jolla, CA
Posts: 749
Received 22 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slantnose!
Regarding 18's, aren't most of the 991 GT3 folks running those?
Is our rear suspension different than theirs?
Been sort-of considering an autocross set-up & would make a huge different if could run some A7's in 18's vs. 19 or 20's.
Brakes and rear-wheel steering setup on GT3 differ from other 991 models. No one is running 18s on a 991 GT3 without radical suspension alteration (Cup car parts), but 19s will fit with minor mods so Hoosiers can be fitted:
https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3/...-prep-diy.html

TT
Old 05-27-2015, 10:38 AM
  #30  
BGB Motorsports
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

Thread Starter
 
BGB Motorsports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Ormond Beach, FL
Posts: 2,776
Received 590 Likes on 260 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slantnose!
Regarding 18's, aren't most of the 991 GT3 folks running those?
Is our rear suspension different than theirs?
Been sort-of considering an autocross set-up & would make a huge different if could run some A7's in 18's vs. 19 or 20's.
Marc Lisner - How goes it?!? I hate to be the bearer of bad news but you can't run the 991 on 18s. There is a knuckle at the bottom of the rear upright that sits less than a few millimeters from the inner lip of the wheel. One of the bigger issues we had trying to get the car classified was the fact that it needed 19s and no 19s existed in our series and then the project died. With the amount of rim flex known, its just not safe to pursue. I saw it done by another team at Daytona at a DE and it definitely rubbed up in the banking. IF you had widebody quarter panels and could therefore space the wheels further outboard, then you would be in business. It is really close but on a regular 991 C2S, if you want the wheels further from the upright you don't have enough quarter panel to stop the tire from protruding beyond the bodywork in the rear.
__________________
BGB Motorsports Group

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 991 Race Track Drivers - PSM On or Off?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:12 AM.