Nano IR Transitional Window Film VS. Porsche IR Thermal Glass
#1
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Nano IR Transitional Window Film VS. Porsche IR Thermal Glass
This is also a new product that we now carry - PhotoSync Heat Transitioning Film, which is made by Prestige Film Technologies. Simply put, this window film's (tint) heat rejecting capabilities transform when sun is more intense.
We were the beta testers for the manufacturer for a good 2.5 years now, so we are very familiar with its capabilities...So how does it perform and how it differs from regular tint?
We put it to test to compare it with Porsche factory installed thermal insulated glass. The factory installed option costs $1125 (for rear glasses only) to the Porsche owner.
Here is our test:
Outdoor temperature: 72 degrees
Time during test: 4pm
Product: Spectra PhotoSync45
Shade: 45% VLT (visible light transmission)
IR Rejection: 98.5% IR Rejection at peak performance
Total Solar Energy Rejection: 65%
VS:
Porsche Thermal IR Glass
Shade: 30% VLT (visible light transmission)
**surface temperature measurements taken on passenger seat exposed to window with PhotoSync45 vs. rear seat exposed to window with Porsche Thermal IR Glass
TEST 1
PhotoSync45 measured at 1 Minute 39 seconds 85.6 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at the 2 Minute mark 87.8 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 2 Minute 35 seconds at 101.1 degrees
TEST 2
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync45 Exposed Seat
Porsche Thermal IR Glass Exposed Seat
Dash
We were the beta testers for the manufacturer for a good 2.5 years now, so we are very familiar with its capabilities...So how does it perform and how it differs from regular tint?
We put it to test to compare it with Porsche factory installed thermal insulated glass. The factory installed option costs $1125 (for rear glasses only) to the Porsche owner.
Here is our test:
Outdoor temperature: 72 degrees
Time during test: 4pm
Product: Spectra PhotoSync45
Shade: 45% VLT (visible light transmission)
IR Rejection: 98.5% IR Rejection at peak performance
Total Solar Energy Rejection: 65%
VS:
Porsche Thermal IR Glass
Shade: 30% VLT (visible light transmission)
**surface temperature measurements taken on passenger seat exposed to window with PhotoSync45 vs. rear seat exposed to window with Porsche Thermal IR Glass
TEST 1
PhotoSync45 measured at 1 Minute 39 seconds 85.6 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at the 2 Minute mark 87.8 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 2 Minute 35 seconds at 101.1 degrees
TEST 2
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync45 Exposed Seat
Porsche Thermal IR Glass Exposed Seat
Dash
__________________
PREMIER PROTECTIVE FILMS (In Business since 1997)
ClearGuard Alpha G2 PPF - Most hydrophobic ppf on the market
SatinGuard PPF
Spectra PhotoSync IRD - Highest heat blocking window film in industry
Authorized Modesta and Nanolex Dealer
Checkout our Youtube Channel!
Premier's Youtube
B: 510-623-1308
42630 Christy St, Fremont, CA 94538
sales@premiermobilegroup.com
http://www.facebook.com/premierprotectivefilms
PREMIER PROTECTIVE FILMS (In Business since 1997)
ClearGuard Alpha G2 PPF - Most hydrophobic ppf on the market
SatinGuard PPF
Spectra PhotoSync IRD - Highest heat blocking window film in industry
Authorized Modesta and Nanolex Dealer
Checkout our Youtube Channel!
Premier's Youtube
B: 510-623-1308
42630 Christy St, Fremont, CA 94538
sales@premiermobilegroup.com
http://www.facebook.com/premierprotectivefilms
#2
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
TEST 2
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync 45 after 18 Minutes 52 seconds - 86.3 degrees
Porsche Thermal IR Glass after 18 Minutes 5 seconds - 91.4 degrees
Dash
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync 45 after 18 Minutes 52 seconds - 86.3 degrees
Porsche Thermal IR Glass after 18 Minutes 5 seconds - 91.4 degrees
Dash
#3
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
TEST 2
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync 45 after 18 Minutes 52 seconds - 86.3 degrees
Porsche Thermal IR Glass after 18 Minutes 5 seconds - 91.4 degrees
Dash
PhotoSync45 measured at 18 Minutes 52 seconds 86.3 degrees
Thermal IR Glass measured at 18 Minutes 5 seconds 91.4 degrees
Windshield exposed front dash measured at 19 Minute 35 seconds 106.8 degrees
PhotoSync 45 after 18 Minutes 52 seconds - 86.3 degrees
Porsche Thermal IR Glass after 18 Minutes 5 seconds - 91.4 degrees
Dash
#4
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Here's what PhotoSync45 (45% VLT shade) look from a distance. To compliment its high heat rejection, it also looks quite nice to boot! For those wondering, PhotoSync comes in the following shades (for comparison purposes, OEM glass comes in at 85%-88%):
75%, 65%, 45%
Manufacturer mentioned to us earlier this month that they may be coming out with a 30% some time later this year.
75%, 65%, 45%
Manufacturer mentioned to us earlier this month that they may be coming out with a 30% some time later this year.
#5
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
The front two windows with PhotoSync45 is not a complete match to Porsche's Thermal IR Glass in the back, but it comes close. Keep in mind PhotoSync45 comes in at 45% while the Porsche glass in the rears came in at 30% - so the Porsche glass is over 15% darker, yet does not perform as well as PhotoSync45
#6
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
As we have all heard, the earth is warming up by approximately 5 degrees since records were kept pre-1900. The hotter regions will get hotter, which means having proper IR and UV protection is important to protecting the interior of vehicles. What we love about PhotoSync is that the performance of it improves as it gets hotter, which at some point reaches as high as 98.5% of infrared rejection. That is quite significant considering that regular tint are typically in the 30% -40% infrared range. With some of the higher end products such as metallics and ceramics, they would only run up as high 75%-85%.
#7
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Here is how this looks from the interior. Again, this is PhotoSync45 on the front two windows only. This product not only performs exceptionally well, but also has a high clarity adhesive system
Trending Topics
#8
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
The performance difference between PhotoSync45 (45% shade) vs. Porsche Thermal IR Glass in the rear windows (approximately 30% shade) is quite significant. Below is a simplified version of our test results:
At around the 2 minute mark - PhotoSync45 windows show a 2.2 degree improvement
At 2.35 minute marker, the windshield (no film) dash area registers a surface temperature of 101 degrees
The seats after over 18 minutes of exposure shows that PhotoSync45 registers an improvement of 5.1 degrees
The windshield dash at that time shows a surface temperature of 106 degrees.
Result: Although the exterior temperature does not provide a very compelling difference (it was only 72 degrees), there is an apparent variance between Porsche's IR Thermal Glass and PhotoSync45. Keep in mind the Porsche glass is darker, so less light (approximately 15% less) is entering the cabin in the rear, yet PhotoSync still outperforms it.
At around the 2 minute mark - PhotoSync45 windows show a 2.2 degree improvement
At 2.35 minute marker, the windshield (no film) dash area registers a surface temperature of 101 degrees
The seats after over 18 minutes of exposure shows that PhotoSync45 registers an improvement of 5.1 degrees
The windshield dash at that time shows a surface temperature of 106 degrees.
Result: Although the exterior temperature does not provide a very compelling difference (it was only 72 degrees), there is an apparent variance between Porsche's IR Thermal Glass and PhotoSync45. Keep in mind the Porsche glass is darker, so less light (approximately 15% less) is entering the cabin in the rear, yet PhotoSync still outperforms it.
#10
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
Don't forget. the factory installed option by Porsche - "Thermal IR Glass" for the Panamera and Cayenne's cost $1125 for just the rear windows!
Yet, it does not perform as well as PhotoSync on a relatively cool day at 72 degrees...now imagine if it was hotter. The degree spread would be more significant!
Yet, it does not perform as well as PhotoSync on a relatively cool day at 72 degrees...now imagine if it was hotter. The degree spread would be more significant!
#11
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
PhotoSync does come in the following shades (represented in "VLT" - visible light transmision)
http://www.prestige-films.com/auto_photosync.shtml
75%
65%
45%
***Keep in mind, according to the manufacturer, their "Solar Adaptive Coating" is what's truly unique about this nano tint. The performance of this tint actually improves as it gets hotter. Another effect of their Solar Adaptive Coating is that the film actually darkens when the sun gets more intense....by up to 11%! We had confirmed this effect as well.
We have used the various products on the market before such as dyed, metallic, ceramic, & hybrids and so far, this is one product that is technologically advanced to match the technology of luxury cars today.
http://www.prestige-films.com/auto_photosync.shtml
75%
65%
45%
***Keep in mind, according to the manufacturer, their "Solar Adaptive Coating" is what's truly unique about this nano tint. The performance of this tint actually improves as it gets hotter. Another effect of their Solar Adaptive Coating is that the film actually darkens when the sun gets more intense....by up to 11%! We had confirmed this effect as well.
We have used the various products on the market before such as dyed, metallic, ceramic, & hybrids and so far, this is one product that is technologically advanced to match the technology of luxury cars today.
#12
Rennlist Member
What if someone wants the glass clear. I'm not into the colored glass. That's why I am looking at this new 3M crystalline.
There is also that Llumar AR 80.
There is also that Llumar AR 80.
#13
Addict
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
Thread Starter
AR80
Visible Light Transmission - 78% (measure of how light the film is)
Total Solar Energy Rejection - 43%
Infrared Rejection - Not Measured or Provided
*Source: http://www.llumar.com/pdf/en/LLumarAutoSpecsUS.pdf
PhotoSync75
Visible Light Transmission - 75.6% (measure of how light the film is)
Total Solar Energy Rejection - 53.5% to 61.3% (this is where this product is truly unique. The film's heat rejection properties improved when it's hotter)
Infrared Rejection - 80% to 88% (again dependent on how hot it gets. The hotter it is outdoor, the better the performance)
*Source: http://www.prestige-films.com/docs/P..._DataSheet.pdf
The performance of PhotoSync compared to Llumar's AR is drastically better. The measurement key is Total Solar Energy Rejection and Infrared Rejection.
#14
As we have all heard, the earth is warming up by approximately 5 degrees since records were kept pre-1900. The hotter regions will get hotter, which means having proper IR and UV protection is important to protecting the interior of vehicles. What we love about PhotoSync is that the performance of it improves as it gets hotter, which at some point reaches as high as 98.5% of infrared rejection. That is quite significant considering that regular tint are typically in the 30% -40% infrared range. With some of the higher end products such as metallics and ceramics, they would only run up as high 75%-85%.