Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Modifying 991.1 steering software

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 4, 2025 | 06:16 PM
  #286  
jfischet's Avatar
jfischet
Three Wheelin'
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 721
From: arizona
Default

...and i still like the completely different feel of GT3 steering setting in my early 991.1 S. i haven't had any issues.

alt theory, Adam, is that the default _is_the GT3 and all of the other maps are artificially adding something that some marketing person wanted. Porsche cars are race cars first so that makes sense.

see: what they did with the temperature readings
Reply
Old Mar 4, 2025 | 06:17 PM
  #287  
Nashvegas's Avatar
Nashvegas
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 1,479
Likes: 714
From: Whidbey Island / PNW
Default

@AdamSanta85 I have read the arguments and I agree it is confusing.

I understand the logic you’re basing the argument on, ie software is in the component, and PIWIS just ticks the software options on, off or changes settings. That is solid.

I’m not a software engineer or Porsche product planner, but I’m unsure if bc the GT3 wasn’t released to the public means / doess not mean the component supplier was / was not including the software already in builds of the hardware (ie the EPS rack/motor/etc). Product development takes awhile and launch dates move up and back regularly.

Let’s look at dates. This is not meant to be argumentative, rather trying to break this mystery down. I too am puzzled by this. It would seem that my car would not be able to even be coded to “GT3” EPS software.
  • Aug 2012 - Spy photo of GT3 at Nurburgring etc - also spy photos of GT3’s around Europe published without camo and real dashboards. If it’s on that track, GT3 software (even if beta) exists.
  • Late 2012 - My C2S was built
  • March 2013 - 991 GT3 was introduced March 2013 at Geneva.
  • May/June 2013 - Chris Harris drove and other UK/EU reviewers drove - and published in June 2013 all published around June 2013. Software deffo done at this time.
  • This means the components for these cars were built early 2013. .... Which means the software was probably finalized sometime before that.
  • The earliest 2014 GT3’s to hit the US were built in maybe October- November 2013. Ish?
Plausible that Porsche was futzing with software from late 2011 at the launch of 991.1 Carrera all the way up until GT3 launch? Maybe? Or not. Perhaps this is the explanation as to why the GT3 software is accessible on all early 991.1 Carreras? But we get an error because of some 'checksum or other coding verification issue’ as others have speculated.

A few other points:
  • Why would PIWIS not be intelligent enough to lock us out of coding options that simply do not work? Seems pretty obvious. IDK though. Not a PIWIS Jedi here.
  • I've not yet run into a failsafe mode for an engine, steering, transmission or other component on a car that didn’t completely neuter the component or driving experience. Engines lose all power, transmissions start in 3rd gear or don’t shift, that sort of thing. When something is in limp mode, it limps. It’s obvious. This is not that. At all. I’m making vast and dumb assumptions, so this is probably a garbage point to make. But - it does seem to make some anecdotal sense based on my automotive history.
  • EPS was controversial on the 911 when 991 came out. In the launch technical documentation, I can find no mention of failsafe mode in any launch or subsequent docs. Maybe I don’t know where to look. (again, making lots of assumptions)
  • The improvements that owners of, for example, 2015 GTS models document here and elsewhere when adding GT3 steering coding seem to be exactly the same improvements I note on mine with the yellow error message, when I select GT3 steering. Characteristic for characteristic, it matches. This is not seat of the pants imagination as can happen with performance modifications... or group think. It’s a real difference and pretty simple to tell the differences.
Anyway, maybe you’re right. Maybe I’m right. Maybe we’ll never know. I do know next time I meet someone who is actually employed in a technical capacity by Porsche I will bring this up. And hopefully I do not go sailing off into a ravine because I’ve hacked my 991.

After 200-210 miles of driving, the GT3 software is a notable and welcomed improvement to my C2S. I’m going to keep watching it and seeing if I notice anything else. The one guy @vincenz0 who noted a domino of other negative effects is surprising and he’s quite smart. So -- yeah. Mystery. Not solved.






Reply
Old Mar 4, 2025 | 06:21 PM
  #288  
aarodynamics's Avatar
aarodynamics
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 132
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by AdamSanta85
I still stand by that the error cars aren’t running the gt3 steering at all

The PIWIS, launch etc do not have the map details within the software, that means it must be on the rack firmware…. Which means older racks cannot have the software of a car that didn’t exist when the rack was built…

The default 991.1 steering map is so bad that some failsafe map is an improvement.
This logic makes sense to me as well. On the other hand, the 991.1 GT3 was released in 2013 in Europe, if I recall correctly. That means it would have been in development at least two years prior (2011). Given that, it makes sense that 2012 cars could have a beta or engineering sample code for the GT3 steering.

I’d guess, though, that it was refined and validated by the time the 991.1 GT3s went into production in 2013. The validation process may also explain why later cars don’t throw an error—perhaps there’s something in the code that confirms its completion (like a certificate or similar mechanism).

Regardless, I sourced a 2016 rack and plan to install it in my 02/2012 car. I’ll share the details eventually—just need to find the time to do it.

Last edited by aarodynamics; Mar 5, 2025 at 10:56 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2025 | 10:57 AM
  #289  
SedateMe's Avatar
SedateMe
Track Day
 
Joined: Dec 2024
Posts: 16
Likes: 16
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Love the investigation and discovery going on in this thread. I recently got my PIWIS 3 setup up and running and figured I’d share my results. I have a 2014 C2S and unfortunately I get the error code when GT3 steering config is enabled. My car also has Power Steering Plus (PSP, which I dislike). Setting the EPS to GT3 absolutely made a notable difference when driving and also notably disabled PSP which was great.

I don’t like the idea of suppressing warnings so I switched back to stock C2/S config until we know more. I think the hypothesis that the software program exists on the EPS module and the PIWIS simply tells the module which config to use makes the most sense. If that’s the case, I’m guessing that the GT3 software on the early EPS modules were either beta or worse, incomplete. Seems like the only way forward for folks like me would be an updated firmware for my EPS module. Subscribed to this thread in case anyone figures it out.

Anyways, here’s the info for my 2014 C2S which throws the EPS faults when GT3 mode is set:
Part number: 99161814706
DSN: 000004
Software version: 1330
Hardware part number: 99161814706
Hardware version: 011
Steering Porsche PN: 99134700513
Spoiler
 

Reply
Old Mar 24, 2025 | 01:30 PM
  #290  
Hank Cohn's Avatar
Hank Cohn
Addict
Rennlist Member

20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 982
Likes: 93
From: Atlanta
Default

I had a 2016 C2 base Black Edition that I coded to GT3 Steering using a PIWIS 3. After making this change, I never encountered any fault messages.

My experience was a bit different from the common consensus here—I found the change in steering input and feedback to be subtle, not the dramatic "night and day" difference often mentioned. Interestingly, switching to GT3 Steering also seemed to blur the difference in suspension feel between Sport and Sport Plus modes. It's worth noting that my car had the stock PASM controller replaced with a DSC controller, making that observation even more perplexing.

In my opinion, if you're getting error codes after changing to GT3 Steering, it might indicate the EPS module defaults to a generic configuration when it can't find the specific named configuration. Ironically, this default setup might actually feel better than the standard steering map.

Hank
Reply
Old Mar 26, 2025 | 01:40 AM
  #291  
Joec500's Avatar
Joec500
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 3,531
Likes: 1,341
From: Los Angeles
Default

If you really want to change the steering feel for about $250, but you lose your airbag.

Just get one of these cup car steering wheels LOL

That's what I did, and love it.



Reply
Old Apr 26, 2025 | 09:47 PM
  #292  
mikescayenne's Avatar
mikescayenne
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 763
Likes: 264
From: Burr Ridge, IL
Default

tried this today using my piwis 3 on my 2014 991.1 turbo S but it failed. It did work doing it in my friends 991.1 C2S though, and anothers 981 boxster S, both said it is def an upgrade, and noticeably better steering feel. i think it failed in mine because i have rear axle steering. Also my EPS module showed version A2_3 in the PIWIS, but his was A2_2, not sure if that made any difference as well. in the dropdown menu i did see 918 spyder option as well, and im tempted to try that in my car.

has anyone ever tried coding the 918 spyder steering setting?

Last edited by mikescayenne; Apr 26, 2025 at 09:52 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2025 | 09:49 PM
  #293  
aarodynamics's Avatar
aarodynamics
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 132
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by mikescayenne
tried this today using my piwis 3 on my 2014 991.1 turbo S but it failed. It did work doing it in my friends 991.1 C2S though, and anothers 981 boxster S, both said it is def an upgrade, and noticeably better steering feel. i think it failed in mine because i have rear axle steering. Also my EPS module showed version A2_3 in the PIWIS, but his was A2_2, not sure if that made any difference as well.
991.1 Turbo variants have a different steering rack.
Reply
Rennlist Stories

The Best Porsche Posts for Porsche Enthusiasts

story-0

Porsche 911 GT3 Artisan Edition Pays Homage to Japanese Culture

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Porsche Reveals Coupe Variant of the Electric Cayenne With a Fresh Look

 Verdad Gallardo
story-2

10 Porsche Colors That Have More Personality Than Most People

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Guntherwerks' Final Speedster Creation Is the Ultimate Porsche Restomod

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Reasons I Hate Going to the Porsche Dealership (& the 1 Reason I Stay)

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Porsche Shakes Up The Nürburgring Lap Record Table Once Again

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

6 Ways the Porsche 911 GT3 S/C Redefines Performance

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

10 Wildest Homologation Specials Porsche Ever Sold

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Super Rare RUF BTR III Comes Out of Hibernation, Looking For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Porsche Opinions That Can Start a Fight

 Joe Kucinski
Old Apr 26, 2025 | 09:53 PM
  #294  
mikescayenne's Avatar
mikescayenne
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 763
Likes: 264
From: Burr Ridge, IL
Default

Originally Posted by aarodynamics
991.1 Turbo variants have a different steering rack.
ahh ok that explains then why it failed.

EDIT: i went back in PIWIS, and noticed there is a GT3RS setting, i know that has RAS so i tried it and it worked! Immedietly took the car for a test drive, but didnt notice much difference. Nothing like what you guys have mentioned when coding carreras to GT3 steering. The steering just felt a little heavier at all speeds, not necessarily better or worse. Wasnt too exciting, but ill keep this setting for a while and see if i notice more differences or just go back to the normal turbo S steering setting. Im thinking with the RAS cars, software change cant really have a big affect on the steering.

Last edited by mikescayenne; Apr 27, 2025 at 01:10 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2025 | 08:25 PM
  #295  
MXA121's Avatar
MXA121
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 315
Likes: 262
Default

Originally Posted by aarodynamics
Has anyone tried this yet?

Does anyone have access to SW 1880 version? If so, please DM me and share?
I'll try this firmware update and let everyone know how it goes.
I just ordered 991.347.005.18 (the latest Supersession EPS rack). My plan is to upgrade the firmware, if that bricks the rack, then just replace the rack with this latest version. Hopefully the rack doesn't brick though, and I can verify a working solution for everyone else here with a 2012-2013 991.1/981.

Here are all the relevant EPS rack part numbers in my research relevant to my early build (02/2012) car:
  1. 991.347.011.02 (991.1 C2S Original)
  2. 991.347.011.03 (Supersession)
  3. 991.347.011.04 (Supersession)
  4. 991.347.011.05 (Supersession)
  5. 991.347.011.06 (Supersession)
  6. 991.347.011.13 (Supersession)
  7. 991.347.011.81 (991.1 GT3 original)
  8. 991.347.011.14 (Supersession)
  9. 991.347.005.14 (Supersession)
  10. 991.347.005.15 (Supersession)
  11. 991.347.005.18 (Latest Supersession)
Does anyone know if you could just replace the servo portion rather than the entire rack?
Would it be easier to just replace servo rather than the entire rack?
Does anyone know approximately much work it would be to replace just the servo or the entire rack?
...
Thanks!
Really excited to hear how your rack replacement goes for all the 2012 and 2013 911s out there! I'm firmly in the camp that errors mean it's a half baked software in the older racks and depending on the specific version could be better/worse. As someone looking to add an early 991.1, I'd probably lean towards a replacement rack to ensure I'm getting the right sauce.

From my research, the steering rack appears to be Bosch steering Gear KS00002888. FCP Euro made the connection, but verify before buying.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2025 | 08:27 PM
  #296  
aarodynamics's Avatar
aarodynamics
Rennlist Member
15 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 132
From: Seattle
Default

Originally Posted by MXA121
Really excited to hear how your rack replacement goes for all the 2012 and 2013 911s out there! I'm firmly in the camp that errors mean it's a half baked software in the older racks and depending on the specific version could be better/worse. As someone looking to add an early 991.1, I'd probably lean towards a replacement rack to ensure I'm getting the right sauce.

From my research, the steering rack appears to be Bosch steering Gear KS00002888. FCP Euro made the connection, but verify before buying.
Oddly coincidental timing — I’m actually in the middle of swapping the rack right now. I’m far enough along to confidently say that the newer rack doesn’t trigger any errors and unlocks additional options like GT4, GT3 RS, etc. They all show up as expected. I still need to code it and get the car fully reassembled before taking it out for a drive, so stay tuned for impressions.

Last edited by aarodynamics; Jun 26, 2025 at 08:28 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2025 | 07:44 AM
  #297  
Sh0ty's Avatar
Sh0ty
Intermediate
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 37
Likes: 17
Default

Just a comment to those selecting “GT3” steering on older 991.1s and receiving an error message:

These codes that we alter are by and large “variant coding” - they are pointers in the software that instruct the ECU to use different addresses for some parameters. E.g. the variant code for model designation may instruct the EPS controller to use different assistance maps or gains. It seems highly unlikely that Porsche / their suppliers would have their homework for the GT3 done so far in advance that the calibrations would be available on 2012, early 2013 cars. The most likely phenomenon here is that the enumeration for GT3 points to default calibrations, and falls outside the range of what an early EPS module would have been calibrated to accept as “valid”, hence the error. I’ll be interested to see how the rack (and therefore EPS module?) replacement goes.

That said, if you like the uncalibrated SW better than the released cal, more power to you. I don’t know the specifics for Porsche in this case, but I’ve been doing embedded SW and calibration for OEMs and suppliers for a little over a decade.

Last edited by Sh0ty; Jun 27, 2025 at 07:45 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2025 | 11:26 AM
  #298  
jfischet's Avatar
jfischet
Three Wheelin'
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 721
From: arizona
Default

well, the GT3 Cup and GT3 RSR were already using EPS in 2011

and here's Rohrl talking about developing EPS for the Carrera S in a 2012 article.
https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-ne...ng-with-rohrl/
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2025 | 11:32 AM
  #299  
Sh0ty's Avatar
Sh0ty
Intermediate
 
Joined: Mar 2025
Posts: 37
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by jfischet
well, the GT3 Cup and GT3 RSR were already using EPS in 2011

and here's Rohrl talking about developing EPS for the Carrera S in a 2012 article.
https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-ne...ng-with-rohrl/
I’ll be the first to say my comments are conjecture, but I’d give it better-than-even odds that it’s close to what’s happening for early 991s that try to reconfigure the EPS as GT3 calibrations.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2025 | 01:00 PM
  #300  
jfischet's Avatar
jfischet
Three Wheelin'
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2014
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 721
From: arizona
Default

i know i sound weird and butthurt arguing for this but if you read through the troubleshooting process we went through two years ago when this came up we discussed that possibility.

i put the car into other modes and drove around.
-the 4S mode gave the error and steering feel was just like the 2S.
-there was another mode that wasn't the GT3 mode that threw the error and felt different from the 4S or 2S modes.
-the GT3 mode throws error and steering feels more like my 993.

so all modes besides the one for the car had the same error and those other calibrations were clearly ready for production.


anywho

got a new steering wheel to match my awesome, perfect, problem-free GT3 calibration. :P
Reply



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:46 PM.

story-0
Porsche 911 GT3 Artisan Edition Pays Homage to Japanese Culture

Slideshow: Porsche has created a Japan-only 911 GT3 Artisan Edition that blends track-ready hardware with design cues inspired by traditional Japanese craftsmanship.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-28 19:37:40


VIEW MORE
story-1
Porsche Reveals Coupe Variant of the Electric Cayenne With a Fresh Look

Slideshow: Porsche's latest electric Cayenne Coupe blends dramatic styling with supercar acceleration, turning the brand's midsize SUV into a 1,139-horsepower flagship.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-27 19:39:30


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Porsche Colors That Have More Personality Than Most People

Slideshow: Porsche's wildest paint colors aren't just shades-they're full-blown personalities on four wheels.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-27 19:38:13


VIEW MORE
story-3
Guntherwerks' Final Speedster Creation Is the Ultimate Porsche Restomod

Slideshow: The last of the Speedsters doesn't just close a chapter, it makes quite the bold, air-cooled statement.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-22 17:55:04


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Reasons I Hate Going to the Porsche Dealership (& the 1 Reason I Stay)

Slideshow: Going to a Porsche dealership may not be the dream experience you expect it to be and these are the reasons why.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 13:54:19


VIEW MORE
story-5
Porsche Shakes Up The Nürburgring Lap Record Table Once Again

Slideshow: Porsche just proved-again-that precision engineering can outrun brute force at the Nürburgring.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-18 20:27:02


VIEW MORE
story-6
6 Ways the Porsche 911 GT3 S/C Redefines Performance

Slideshow: Six reasons why you will love the Porsche 911 GT3 S/C and 1 reason you will hate it.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-14 10:21:39


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Wildest Homologation Specials Porsche Ever Sold

Slideshow: Some of the most desirable Porsche models are those that were sold to the public solely for homologation purposes.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-08 09:54:26


VIEW MORE
story-8
Super Rare RUF BTR III Comes Out of Hibernation, Looking For a New Home

Slideshow: The lone BTR III-spec Targa features rare RUF engineering with a 430-hp turbo flat-six and fewer than 30 miles since its rebuild.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-04-06 20:03:25


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Porsche Opinions That Can Start a Fight

Slideshow: If you want to start a debate with a Porsche friend, these 10 opinions are a great way to get started.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-02 16:53:02


VIEW MORE