Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Fun with numbers, HP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-2021, 07:21 PM
  #16  
fsmich
Rennlist Member
 
fsmich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: socal
Posts: 382
Received 163 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

You can toggle on the APR graphs for crank and wheel hp. They seem to be using a 6% drive train loss to calculate the crank hp. (Some charts from the "GTS turbo kits" are misplaced from the original GTS dyno graphs). They claim 554 crank hp/ 523whp on the original GTS graphs for your 93 tune
Old 04-09-2021, 09:57 PM
  #17  
polobai
Drifting
 
polobai's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Jupiter FL
Posts: 2,845
Received 1,125 Likes on 670 Posts
Default

6% seems awfully low for loss from crank to tires, no? I was thinking 12% as on most rwd cars (front engine) they estimate between 15-20%. I doubt we lose that much but I didn’t think it was in the single digits...
Old 04-09-2021, 11:03 PM
  #18  
fsmich
Rennlist Member
 
fsmich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: socal
Posts: 382
Received 163 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

I agree seems low, but it's really an arbitrary number since they are deriving it from their dyno numbers. They use 6 in the GTS charts. Their dyno numbers and Cobb's dyno numbers were similar on my car, as were my 60-130 and 1/4 traps on the 2 tunes.
Old 04-10-2021, 02:59 AM
  #19  
Nathan_
Instructor
 
Nathan_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 229
Received 81 Likes on 50 Posts
Default

12% on 911 and 18% on M3 from my experience.

qtr mile, 100-200kph times and 60-130mph times are more important measures IMO



Quick Reply: Fun with numbers, HP



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:40 AM.