Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 Carrera T Modifications

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-28-2019 | 06:38 PM
  #16  
cosmo1's Avatar
cosmo1
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 584
Likes: 123
Default

Plenum from what I researched is a waste of money imo… How much torque you pushing?
Old 09-28-2019 | 07:23 PM
  #17  
PTS-BRG's Avatar
PTS-BRG
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 1,783
Likes: 636
From: Greenwich, CT
Default

IPD plenum is a waste of money, no one has ever tested the Tial Plenum which was supposedly designed specifically for the 3.0 engines..
Old 09-28-2019 | 09:02 PM
  #18  
fsmich's Avatar
fsmich
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 385
Likes: 165
From: socal
Default

Originally Posted by cosmo1
Many gave him a hard time because he often Trolls here and you are well aware of it.. Would love to see the dyno to compare it to my Pure 64mm Turbos.. Congrats on your setup, looks good..
Hi Cosmo, is your 7.55 60-130 on Dragy with the Pure Turbo's? Or do you have new/faster results with the Pure's?
Old 09-29-2019 | 05:46 AM
  #19  
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
GT3ZZZ
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 475
Likes: 200
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Psorcery
Best aftermarket setup I've seen to date. 580WHP is insane! Love the Kline pieces.. Inconel or SS? Would love to hear this beast and see it go.

Couple questions.. Is 7.5 60-130mph correct? That seems rather slow for this power and setup. I know this could be due to taking your time shifting from 3-4th gear... An extra 4.4 seconds to get from 100-130mph doesn't add up... Also, in your MT how far up does 4th gear take you? At 130 or beyond? I just remembered the T has shorter gearing so that maybe the culprit if you have to shift into 5th gear. For reference, in a PDK non T.. 4th gear takes you into the mid 130's.

Lastly, I'm glad you had pleasant dealings with boostaddict. Many gave the guy a hard time and bashed him around here. Not to make this thread about that, but I'm just truly happy to hear good things.

Enjoy!
I have the Kline system in inconel, sounds great especially with the bigger turbos, grumbly at idle with lots of whistle on boost.

The timings are down to the manual box and needing to shift from 3rd to 4th around 105mph. As well as the physical shift time (which could orobably be improved), the car loses a bit of boost in the process. I think a PDK car would be easily sub 7secs with this set up. 130mph is done in 4th.
Old 09-29-2019 | 11:36 AM
  #20  
Gh0st0's Avatar
Gh0st0
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 464
Likes: 37
From: Midwest
Default

How long has the setup been on the car? Looks like everything fits pretty well
Old 09-29-2019 | 12:23 PM
  #21  
blackoutz's Avatar
blackoutz
Instructor
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 188
Likes: 71
Default

Definitely interested in long term reliability with this setup. Is the motor up for this kind of power increase?
Old 09-29-2019 | 01:03 PM
  #22  
Valvefloat991's Avatar
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 121
From: Golden, CO
Default

Originally Posted by blackoutz
Definitely interested in long term reliability with this setup. Is the motor up for this kind of power increase?
Excellent question. We know the motor is up to the 450 hp that the GTS models produce, because the internals of all three 9A2B6 motors are the same. However, generating this amount of power requires about 30 psi of boost--12 more than the GTS has.

I know Porsche engines are built with some reliability margin, but I wonder if this kind of increase doesn't exceed that margin.
Old 09-29-2019 | 02:03 PM
  #23  
spdracerut's Avatar
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,835
Likes: 610
Default

Originally Posted by blackoutz
Definitely interested in long term reliability with this setup. Is the motor up for this kind of power increase?
That's a good question. Back in the 90's, pre-fuel economy concerns, the Japanese engines could easily handle double the power from their stock rating all day long and handle 3x before blowing up because they were built like tanks. With fuel economy gaining priority, parts are designed only as strong as they need to be. Until someone can do a stress analysis on the stock engine components (conrods typically are the first to go, pistons, bearings, cylinder walls, etc) or just beats the hell out of an engine on a road course a different levels of power, we're not going to find out. Probably the closest is 4point0 who is making somewhere over 600hp and tracks his car regularly.
Old 09-29-2019 | 03:09 PM
  #24  
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
GT3ZZZ
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 475
Likes: 200
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by blackoutz
Definitely interested in long term reliability with this setup. Is the motor up for this kind of power increase?
I guess no-one really knows, Ken at 9e who has tuned my car is at edge of his personal comfort zone with my setup, it needs miles to prove it one way or the other. He thinks it will be fine for hooning up to 150mph but not as good beyond as intake temps are 50C+ albeit its warm here right now. A meth setup would be needed to go further and then there's the rods...
Old 09-29-2019 | 03:13 PM
  #25  
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
GT3ZZZ
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 475
Likes: 200
From: UK
Default

Originally Posted by Valvefloat991
Excellent question. We know the motor is up to the 450 hp that the GTS models produce, because the internals of all three 9A2B6 motors are the same. However, generating this amount of power requires about 30 psi of boost--12 more than the GTS has.

I know Porsche engines are built with some reliability margin, but I wonder if this kind of increase doesn't exceed that margin.
My car is now running max of 1.8 bar i.e. 26 PSI.

I have 7,500 pretty hard miles at 1.5 bar (22 PSI) without probs.
Old 09-29-2019 | 04:19 PM
  #26  
K-Nut's Avatar
K-Nut
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 387
Likes: 229
Default Similar set up



In

Out
I have Cobb tune and original turbos. Car sound and drives superior. Working on adjusting tune . When done will post numbers. Super happy
The following users liked this post:
cosmo1 (09-29-2019)
Old 09-29-2019 | 04:42 PM
  #27  
GT3ZZZ's Avatar
GT3ZZZ
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 475
Likes: 200
From: UK
Default

Congrats, very similar to mine bar the turbos. Will be very interested to see your numbers
The following users liked this post:
K-Nut (09-29-2019)
Old 09-29-2019 | 04:57 PM
  #28  
jimmymoO's Avatar
jimmymoO
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 631
Likes: 115
From: SF Bay Area
Default

Delete
Old 09-29-2019 | 10:16 PM
  #29  
Valvefloat991's Avatar
Valvefloat991
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 1,157
Likes: 121
From: Golden, CO
Default

Originally Posted by GT3ZZZ
My car is now running max of 1.8 bar i.e. 26 PSI.

I have 7,500 pretty hard miles at 1.5 bar (22 PSI) without probs.
That's encouraging, though 26 psi is less than the arithmetic suggests would be needed for some 600 hp. The duty cycle also matters a lot when it comes to durability. The occasional ten-second blast a full throttle is one thing, a top speed run or a track day is something else.

I hope you end up proving, not finding out, just how durable these engines are.
Old 09-30-2019 | 09:17 AM
  #30  
Rennolazine's Avatar
Rennolazine
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 788
From: Chitown, USA
Default

BEAST MODE. Congrats guys on some awesome builds! K Nut needs to get back on the dyno after we get the map sorted. Target is 450+ wheel on a mustang (where the aggressive cobb stage 1- before they dialed it back- yielded 404 whp and 450 wtq). If he doesnt hit 450hp, who should he get to remote protune? Mitch, Sambo??? Right now the “custom” Cobb stage 2 map is running only 17-18 psi and he boosting over target instantly, Super smooth and strong AF. Zero traction lmao



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:49 AM.