Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 C4s turbo problems. Has anyone had this happen??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-14-2019, 11:49 PM
  #16  
Cheshi143
Pro
 
Cheshi143's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 509
Received 284 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AnandN
What I don't understand is why the car would show a code for supercharger malfunction when it was a faulty gasket in the fuel pump?
I should amend my previous comment. While I don't have any issues with the turbos (no messages or loss of power) the boost gauge rarely shows any boost. It used to show up to 12 psi in sport but now nothing. Maybe 4-5 psi but usually nothing. I haven't bothered with it because the car drives fine. At my next service in July, I will ask the dealer.
Because the vacuum system is tied into the evaporative emissions.

There are flaps on the intake runners of the supercharger intake manifold that have vacuum actuated solenoids that control them.

The flaps got stuck closed because there was insufficient vacuum to open them. With them closed there was not enough airflow so the manifold absolute pressure sensor responds with a boost target not reached.

The German techs found the vacuum leak issue by isolating the intake manifold flaps and since the supercharger had been on and off the car several times they happened to find a vacuum line that was compromised.

In the end however the true culprit was the fuel tank sending unit/fuel pump gasket.
Old 06-14-2019, 11:56 PM
  #17  
docjackson1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
docjackson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I am amazed that after buying 15 to 20 cars over 33 years, that this dealer doesnt stand on their head to get me a replacement part, especially after they destroyed the hoses when they removed the turbos. Let's say another few weeks goes by and no parts, the car is down for 6 weeks with no parts on the horizon. I am then in a tougher situation. Cannot get the car on the road and am still obligated to pay the lease. The dealer does nothing to solve a problem that they caused and I have to pay for it. The warranty is then useless
Old 06-15-2019, 12:06 AM
  #18  
AnandN
Rennlist Member
 
AnandN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NH/FL
Posts: 1,439
Received 390 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928
A couple of things to consider:

The codes thrown and read by PIWIS are only as good as the embedded software code. That code is only as good as the imaginations of the Porsche employees/contractors/suppliers writing the software requirements. Humans are notoriously bad at prognosticating how failures will manifest. Teams of humans,. in my experience, as a matter of course, positively hate writing requirement and then code for logging errors. They like that less than writing test code. Thus, the codes read by PIWIS can be wild goose chases.

PCNA will only reimburse a dealer for warranty work if it is approved. How does work get approved? You guessed it: based upon PIWIS codes and fault trees. Only after the fault tree has be exhaustively covered are experienced 'authorized' brains allowed to consider the problem irrespective of 'the book.' And those 'authorized' brains are PCNA employees.

So, no matter how smart or motivated a Dealer Tech is, they can only do, under a warranty situation, what PCNA approves.
I understand your explanation but it seems like a very bizarre situation. If diagnostic codes can lead to wild goose chases, what recourse does a technician have in diagnosing a problem correctly? These guys are left in the dark. Experience should help but these are new engines. Porsche must be training them otherwise how are they approved as certified Porsche dealers and technicians? And finally, it seems this odd relationship between dealer and Porsche is screwing the customer. It does not spell confidence at all. Automotive engines and software is not my field so a customer like me can expect to get the runaround because I cannot diagnose the problem myself or have to pay for the dealer’s mistakes even when the car is under warranty? Imagine this happening in the medical field in imaging or IVD or even therapeutics. Companies get screwed and can’t pass the buck to the patient because of the relationship between the device manufacturer and the hospital.
Old 06-15-2019, 12:10 AM
  #19  
AnandN
Rennlist Member
 
AnandN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NH/FL
Posts: 1,439
Received 390 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cheshi143
Because the vacuum system is tied into the evaporative emissions.

There are flaps on the intake runners of the supercharger intake manifold that have vacuum actuated solenoids that control them.

The flaps got stuck closed because there was insufficient vacuum to open them. With them closed there was not enough airflow so the manifold absolute pressure sensor responds with a boost target not reached.

The German techs found the vacuum leak issue by isolating the intake manifold flaps and since the supercharger had been on and off the car several times they happened to find a vacuum line that was compromised.

In the end however the true culprit was the fuel tank sending unit/fuel pump gasket.
I see. Thanks for the explanation.
Old 06-15-2019, 01:08 AM
  #20  
worf928
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
worf928's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gone. On the Open Road
Posts: 16,340
Received 1,550 Likes on 1,012 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AnandN
I understand your explanation but it seems like a very bizarre situation.
See Cheshi143's example of how bizarre it can be to follow an error code.

If diagnostic codes can lead to wild goose chases, what recourse does a technician have in diagnosing a problem correctly?
If the car is under warranty? Almost none.

These guys are left in the dark.
It's actually worse than you think...

Experience should help but these are new engines. Porsche must be training them otherwise how are they approved as certified Porsche dealers and technicians?
Yes. They are trained. On how to take them apart, put them together, how to read codes and follow the fault diagnosis trees. Experienced, smart technicians can sometimes combine that training with their basic knowledge. And Porsche technicians are, for the most part, the cream of the crop. With your more main-stream marques the vast majority of the technicians are 'parts swappers' pure and simple.

The *problem* with modern cars is that no amount of training and knowledge will illuminate what is happening inside the embedded software code in the various control units. A veritable $h1+-ton of functionality is controlled or modulated by the software. The requirements of the software are not part of the training.

A simple somewhat contrived example: On 'old school' Porsche's oil temperature is the result of purely mechanical and simple electrical systems. A problem with too-high oil temperature is diagnosable with knowledge, wiring diagrams, and simple tools. Whereas on this generation of Porsches, steady-state oil temperature can be 'changed' via the Sport/Sport+ buttons. These buttons are connected not by discrete wires but to a network. When pressed their signal on the network causes a control unit to do 'something.' But exactly what?

Furthermore, while a real-time diagnostic data gathering mode exists via the PIWIS laptop there is no training for what the resultant logs actually mean or how to interpret them.

Again a simple non-contrived example: One of the outputs in the log is 'throttle position' for each data sample in time. On an old-school Porsche there's a cable between the pedal and the actual throttle plate for the intake system. However, on modern cars, the pedal is connected 'by software' to the throttle plate. So, is the position in the log that which is commanded by the pedal? Or is it the throttle plate position commanded by the engine control unit? The techs don't know the answer to this question. And the answer to that question can be critical during diagnosis.

And finally, it seems this odd relationship between dealer and Porsche is screwing the customer.
It is. Porsche A.G. squeezes Porsche Co North America. PCNA squeezes the dealers. The dealers are then caught between PCNA and their customers.
It does not spell confidence at all.
It is an eye opener when you see how the sausage is made.

Automotive engines and software is not my field so a customer like me can expect to get the runaround because I cannot diagnose the problem myself or have to pay for the dealer’s mistakes even when the car is under warranty?
Well, if the car is under warranty you 'pay' as a result of not being able to drive the car. If you have a good dealer or a good relationship you'll at least get a loaner.

Where it really gets ugly is when your Porsche is out of warranty. Then you pay sooner or later for mistakes others may make.

And that is why, I will add, I am busy accumulating knowledge and tools pertinent to the care and feeding of the modern Porsches. The key variable in this is when/if enough reverse engineering happens to be able to dispense with the PIWIS laptop (which is simply too expensive for any entity that doesn't use it almost every day. For financial mortals at least.) If it doesn't happen there will come a time when the only Porsches we own are 928s. Those are not a mystery to me.

Imagine this happening in the medical field in imaging or IVD or even therapeutics. Companies get screwed and can’t pass the buck to the patient because of the relationship between the device manufacturer and the hospital.
I'm not quite sure I understand the above. I've been involved in software for the healthcare industry and my wife heads QA for a medical device company. With years of absorbing stories from her, my participation on the software side, and decades of experience as an 'end user' I have to say that my perspective is that making the healthcare sausage is far more ugly than the automotive repair sausage.




Old 06-15-2019, 03:21 AM
  #21  
AnandN
Rennlist Member
 
AnandN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: NH/FL
Posts: 1,439
Received 390 Likes on 255 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by worf928

I'm not quite sure I understand the above. I've been involved in software for the healthcare industry and my wife heads QA for a medical device company. With years of absorbing stories from her, my participation on the software side, and decades of experience as an 'end user' I have to say that my perspective is that making the healthcare sausage is far more ugly than the automotive repair sausage.
I am not saying mistakes don’t happen in the healthcare industry. The consequences can be very severe for everyone. Misdiagnosis is not uncommon unfortunately. But usually, the patient has some recourse and that appears to be the big difference compared to the current one with the Op’s car and their dilemma. Rarely is the patient left to their own devices because a provider or a manufacturer of say a test screwed up. Let’s say a patient complains of severe stomach pain. The doctor feels a mass by palpating the abdomen. The doctor wants an ultrasound or CT but the instrument at the hospital shows nothing. A good doctor would send the patient to another imaging lab to confirm the initial diagnosis. Say, a mass is found and is consistent with a soft tissue tumor that needs immediate excision. All is good then.

The hospital then calls the instrument manufacturer to complain that their expensive instrument is malfunctioning. The manufacturer says that the hospital must have broken it and they won’t take care it. Or they send an incompetent or untrained technician who can’t find any problems. Guess how long before they are out of business or sued?.If the hospital is a long term customer, would you want to lose the account? If the doctor, based on the original scan had sent the patient home and the patient got a second opinion that confirmed the original diagnosis, what would happen to the doctor or hospital? Can they blame the instrument manufacturer or the patient? Worse, what if the patient did not follow up after the initial misdiagnosis and died because the tumor metastasized and could not be treated? Then the hospital and doctor are liable for malpractice.

Car is just a car. Can't drive it. No big deal. But this situation with the dealer and Porsche is absurd. Makes me rethink my prospects of long term ownership of my 911 that I bought new.

Last edited by AnandN; 06-15-2019 at 01:19 PM.
Old 06-15-2019, 05:30 AM
  #22  
Porsche_nuts
Nordschleife Master
 
Porsche_nuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 5,282
Received 1,132 Likes on 677 Posts
Default

Why would Germany be "not willing to send the vacuum hoses?" That makes no sense whatsoever. It seems that they are not telling you the whole story or are just flat out lying to you.
Old 06-15-2019, 05:34 AM
  #23  
Penn4S
Rennlist Member
 
Penn4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,675
Received 1,305 Likes on 732 Posts
Default

I am a 13 Porsche car owner over time and would be at wits end over this. Especially if I'm paying for a lease.
If the lease is through Porsche Financial I would call, write or have my lawyer write them a letter stating you are not paying the lease until Porsche and the dealer work out the issue. I always find stopping the flow of cash to be a good way to get attention.
This is a ridiculous situation your dealer should be taking care of and offering to compensate you financially.
Old 06-15-2019, 05:49 AM
  #24  
docjackson1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
docjackson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes the dealer should. But they are not doing a thing except telling me how tough the parent company in Germany is to deal with. I would have thought they would have jumped all over this to show me how they take care of a great customer. I think if I dont pay Porsche financial until the car is fixxed the bank will consider me late and screw my credit. I dont think the bank cares how the company screws the customers
Old 06-15-2019, 06:03 AM
  #25  
Porsche_nuts
Nordschleife Master
 
Porsche_nuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 5,282
Received 1,132 Likes on 677 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docjackson1
Yes the dealer should. But they are not doing a thing except telling me how tough the parent company in Germany is to deal with. I would have thought they would have jumped all over this to show me how they take care of a great customer. I think if I dont pay Porsche financial until the car is fixxed the bank will consider me late and screw my credit. I dont think the bank cares how the company screws the customers

Yeah, you will for sure get a ding on your credit report. Companies that do the credit thing just look at payments - if you are late they report it. They don't care if the non payment is justified or not - or should I say they consider any non-payment not justified.
Old 06-15-2019, 06:18 AM
  #26  
docjackson1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
docjackson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

That is the problem. What leverage do I have to coerce them to act responsibly ? I am going to drive to the dealer tomorrow and try a d convince the owner, whose name the dealership is in to get involved and to call Germany and to demand the hose that they broke. The service advisor tells me they never worked on a turbo before, if you believe it. It was their inexperience that destroyed my vacuum hoses. The dealer breaks the car and stands it and tells me that I have a problem. What a bunch of non professionals they are
Old 06-15-2019, 07:02 AM
  #27  
Jay-S
Rennlist Member
 
Jay-S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 544
Received 159 Likes on 49 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by docjackson1
Yes the dealer should. But they are not doing a thing except telling me how tough the parent company in Germany is to deal with. I would have thought they would have jumped all over this to show me how they take care of a great customer. I think if I dont pay Porsche financial until the car is fixxed the bank will consider me late and screw my credit. I dont think the bank cares how the company screws the customers
I knew a guy who got Porsche to cover his monthly payment while his car was in the shop for over a month. No idea how he pulled that off. Really speaks to the disparity in how different customers are treated. I'm just stunned at your eperience and I'm sorry you have to go through this.
Old 06-15-2019, 08:04 AM
  #28  
ClassJ
Rennlist Member
 
ClassJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,119
Received 284 Likes on 169 Posts
Default

Which dealer is this? Had an issue with one NNJ dealer with the radio in my Cayman. The PCM was freezing and locking up randomly. Restarts did not fix it but after the car sat overnight it was fine. This would happen a few times a month.

The dealer said Porsche refused to fix the car until
they had proof of the issue. Two visits later and finally a video I took and they repaired the car.
Old 06-15-2019, 08:43 AM
  #29  
n8kruger
Racer
 
n8kruger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Call PCNA and complain. After my dealer nightmare they sent me a nice check. I can't say they were very helpful in resolving it but realistically that's all they could do. I think they can also put pressure on the dealer well above the meager means of the consumer.
Old 06-15-2019, 09:53 AM
  #30  
docjackson1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
docjackson1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thank you. Calling PCNA is a good idea. I will try it


Quick Reply: 991.2 C4s turbo problems. Has anyone had this happen??



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:59 PM.