Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991 Hybrid!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2019, 10:04 PM
  #1  
chuckbdc
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,591
Received 319 Likes on 193 Posts
Default 991 Hybrid!

The latest PCA e-Brake News has an interesting piece, with a road test, of a hybrid system mod for the 991. An additional 175 HP on demand with a system that they say adds 180 lbs.

The website is http://vonnen.com

Works now and gives a hint of what's to come.

Oh and its just $75k!
Old 01-01-2019, 10:28 PM
  #2  
Freddie Two Bs
Rennlist Member
 
Freddie Two Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,257
Received 464 Likes on 295 Posts
Default

Someone must have thought "the 991 was too nice a 911, we need to find a way to make it at least a bit ****ty".
Old 01-01-2019, 11:33 PM
  #3  
jnolan
Pro
 
jnolan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 742
Received 73 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Smart and really exciting. A fully EV 911 doesn’t do much for me but a hybrid does.

Originally Posted by chuckbdc
The latest PCA e-Brake News has an interesting piece, with a road test, of a hybrid system mod for the 991. An additional 175 HP on demand with a system that they say adds 180 lbs.

The website is http://vonnen.com

Works now and gives a hint of what's to come.

Oh and its just $75k!
Old 01-01-2019, 11:37 PM
  #4  
Sharm
Pro
 
Sharm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: DC Area
Posts: 695
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Dammit Chuckbdc you beat me to it!
Old 01-01-2019, 11:38 PM
  #5  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,783
Received 583 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

I did an analysis of their system and it doesn't make sense. Basically, the battery pack is way undersized for the current draw they are asking from it. Batteries have what is known as a C-rate. Basically how fast you charge/discharge a cell. C-rate normalizes for battery capacity. Long story short, the higher the C-rate you charge/discharge a battery cell, the quicker you shorten its life.

So say you have a battery with 5Ah capacity. If you charge/discharge it at 5A, that's a C-rate of 1. Discharge at 10A, that's a C-rate of 2. Discharge at 2.5A, that's a C-rate of 0.5. For reference, a Model S at max acceleration has a C-rate of ~5. Because this battery Vonnen is using is so small capacity, it will have a C-rate of about 130... Typically for good cell life, you typically don't want to exceed 0.5C-1.0C too much.

Battery can't be li-ion. No way it could handle a C-rate of 130. Most of the time, you try not to exceed 1C. So.... I can't imagine it handling 130x that. So MAYBE LiPo battery like those used in R/C planes. But even those, I've only found a max C-rate of 60 with 20-30 being common. So.... Vonnen is asking 2x more C-rate than anything I can find.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:25 AM
  #6  
visitador
Rennlist Member
 
visitador's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: San Francisco Bay Area
Posts: 1,757
Received 144 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Interesting idea about getting instant torque. Asides from the technical concerns, a $75K charge will mean that I would have shed around $150K (my 991.1 was CPO). At that price point, I may as well get a slightly used 991.1 GT3, maybe even a 991.2 GT3 if the economy falls apart.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:50 AM
  #7  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,156
Received 1,293 Likes on 681 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by visitador
Interesting idea about getting instant torque. Asides from the technical concerns, a $75K charge will mean that I would have shed around $150K (my 991.1 was CPO). At that price point, I may as well get a slightly used 991.1 GT3, maybe even a 991.2 GT3 if the economy falls apart.
yep that price point is crazy for what they say it does.
Old 01-02-2019, 08:56 AM
  #8  
2000se
Instructor
 
2000se's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 245
Received 44 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by spdracerut
I did an analysis of their system and it doesn't make sense. Basically, the battery pack is way undersized for the current draw they are asking from it. Batteries have what is known as a C-rate. Basically how fast you charge/discharge a cell. C-rate normalizes for battery capacity. Long story short, the higher the C-rate you charge/discharge a battery cell, the quicker you shorten its life.

So say you have a battery with 5Ah capacity. If you charge/discharge it at 5A, that's a C-rate of 1. Discharge at 10A, that's a C-rate of 2. Discharge at 2.5A, that's a C-rate of 0.5. For reference, a Model S at max acceleration has a C-rate of ~5. Because this battery Vonnen is using is so small capacity, it will have a C-rate of about 130... Typically for good cell life, you typically don't want to exceed 0.5C-1.0C too much.

Battery can't be li-ion. No way it could handle a C-rate of 130. Most of the time, you try not to exceed 1C. So.... I can't imagine it handling 130x that. So MAYBE LiPo battery like those used in R/C planes. But even those, I've only found a max C-rate of 60 with 20-30 being common. So.... Vonnen is asking 2x more C-rate than anything I can find.

Good stuff spdracerut. This is the kind of information that helps people understand the backdrop of things. Thanks for the enlightenment.
Old 01-02-2019, 09:08 AM
  #9  
Sharm
Pro
 
Sharm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: DC Area
Posts: 695
Received 73 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by visitador
Interesting idea about getting instant torque. Asides from the technical concerns, a $75K charge will mean that I would have shed around $150K (my 991.1 was CPO). At that price point, I may as well get a slightly used 991.1 GT3, maybe even a 991.2 GT3 if the economy falls apart.
In addition, why not just wait for the 992 hybrid which will be out in a couple years. For +$75k and a trade-in or sell off of your 991.1, you'll easily be able to buy one from the factory directly from Porsche.

Btw, added linked youtube video below.

Old 01-02-2019, 09:28 AM
  #10  
chuckbdc
Race Car
Thread Starter
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,591
Received 319 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rick brooklyn
Someone must have thought "the 991 was too nice a 911, we need to find a way to make it at least a bit ****ty".
For some slower is better. To each their own.
Old 01-02-2019, 11:01 AM
  #11  
WCE
User
 
WCE's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,001
Received 188 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Very cool setup - if I still had my Carrera this would be tempting (at a price point under $20k).
$75k will be a very tough sell... maybe they could get that for their stage 2 (350hp) kit?
Battery is lithium titanate - will that give them their C-rate spdracerut? (excerpt from Wikipedia):

A lithium-titanate battery is a modified lithium-ion battery that uses lithium-titanate nanocrystals, instead of carbon, on the surface of its anode. This gives the anode a surface area of about 100 square meters per gram, compared with 3 square meters per gram for carbon, allowing electrons to enter and leave the anode quickly. This makes fast recharging possible and provides high currents when needed.[7] Lithium-titanate cells also last for 3000 to 7000 charge cycles, far longer than other battery chemistries.[8]

A disadvantage of lithium-titanate batteries is that they have a lower inherent voltage (2.4 V), which leads to a lower specific energy (about 30–110 Wh/kg[1]) than conventional lithium-ion battery technologies, which have an inherent voltage of 3.7 V.[9]

Lithium-titanate batteries are reported to have an energy density of up to 177 Wh/L.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:18 PM
  #12  
Stevelev
Rennlist Member
 
Stevelev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Canada
Posts: 564
Received 172 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WCE
Very cool setup - if I still had my Carrera this would be tempting (at a price point under $20k).
$75k will be a very tough sell...
X2 ! (for my 981). I cant imagine many will rationalize $75k for this but time will tell.
Old 01-02-2019, 01:34 PM
  #13  
garfunkle
Banned
 
garfunkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 2,348
Received 1,149 Likes on 630 Posts
Default

This is one of those mods that I like reading about and am glad other people are doing because it is very interesting but I am not a customer.

I've been following these guys for a couple of years now and some of my observations and un educated opinions.

1. Needs more capacity. This system[battery] dies after WOT for >10 seconds. So maybe double up on batteries but then weight + charging capacity.
2. ~120 pounds of added weight is good. Makes it still lighter than a 991.2 :0
3. That INSTANT torque would likely ruin me for other cars
4. The price point is a little rich but it does include labor and taking apart the transmission
5a. This should have been done on a 996 IMO since they are so cheap
5b. As soon a V.2 comes out or battery technology gets even a little better, a car with this kit will have the value of a paper weight.
Old 01-02-2019, 03:04 PM
  #14  
spdracerut
Three Wheelin'
 
spdracerut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 1,783
Received 583 Likes on 392 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by WCE
A lithium-titanate battery is a modified lithium-ion battery that uses lithium-titanate nanocrystals, instead of carbon, on the surface of its anode. This gives the anode a surface area of about 100 square meters per gram, compared with 3 square meters per gram for carbon, allowing electrons to enter and leave the anode quickly.
Hmm.... well, if we assume that C-rate is a function of anode surface area, the lithium-titanate chemistry has about 30x higher C-rate capability than a standard li-ion. So li-titanate might be comfy with a C-rate of 30. As Tesla uses a C-rate of about 5x the comfy limit for li-ion at max acceleration, then maybe we can assume the li-titante can do 150 which would be enough for this application which is asking 130. But man.... that's a lot of assuming. One would hope they did cell life testing. Another thing to consider is the battery will get very hot when they do this max 130C rate. It's a lot of current to pull out of a very small battery, so there's not much mass to spread out the heat essentially. Think small tea cup of water on the stove vs. a huge put of water. So their battery cooling scheme better work well.
Old 03-12-2020, 09:44 AM
  #15  
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Nearby
Posts: 11,131
Received 2,471 Likes on 1,560 Posts
Default

The following users liked this post:
burnergt4 (03-13-2020)



Quick Reply: 991 Hybrid!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:32 PM.