Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Experience with Porsche Ceramic Composite Brake option

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2018, 02:39 PM
  #16  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 1,965
Received 476 Likes on 299 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Clark-ApexPerformance
We have done over 60 of the PCCB to iron conversions on GT4s and 991 GT3s. All customers have been very happy.

Clark
Yep I was one of the 60! Clark is the man!
Old 03-03-2018, 01:18 AM
  #17  
Terrence
Rennlist Member
 
Terrence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 943
Received 31 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aCayenneFan
Does the option justify its $8,520 price tag? Shorter stopping distance? Longevity of rotors & pads (especially considering the replacement costs)? And, and, and.

If you had to do it again, would you check the option box?

Thanks in advance.
Depends on the car.

Any GT car, definitely. Turbo S, maybe. Others, not so much. I didn’t order it on my GTS.
Old 03-03-2018, 01:59 AM
  #18  
hbear
Racer
 
hbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 339
Received 24 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Also thought they weren’t quite as good in the wet when you haven’t depressed the brake for a little bit. Something about a water film developing on the surface that hampers initial braking.
Old 03-03-2018, 04:47 PM
  #19  
seapar
Three Wheelin'
 
seapar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I have had PCCB on 2007 GT3 and 2015 Turbo S. I have had steels on 2015 GT3 , 2016 GT4, and 2018 GTS.
I prefer the feel of steel brakes. Ceramics are grippy and for me harder to modulate. And I track a fair amount. So it's a preference and a budget item for me. I like to keep the MSRP down on my builds. The TTS was a CPO.
YMMV
Old 03-03-2018, 04:58 PM
  #20  
aCayenneFan
Pro
Thread Starter
 
aCayenneFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: S.F. Bay Area
Posts: 539
Received 56 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

To those who have mentioned that the PCCB option has a grippy braking experience, are you referring to a transition from no slowing to hard slowing that doesn't provide much ability to modulate? Or?

I really like the part about low rotational mass, no brake dust and very low rotor wear, but rotor fragility is a bit of a downside. Opportunity for damage to the rotors when replacing tires seems like an accident waiting to happen.
Old 03-03-2018, 05:28 PM
  #21  
gellie
Rennlist Member
 
gellie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,098
Received 234 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Yes that was my thought process exactly when deciding no to get them on my 17 Cab S. I wouldn’t might paying for them once,but twice? Maybe if the roads by me didn’t resemble a 3rd world country.
Old 03-03-2018, 06:08 PM
  #22  
jnolan
Pro
 
jnolan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 742
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by aCayenneFan
To those who have mentioned that the PCCB option has a grippy braking experience, are you referring to a transition from no slowing to hard slowing that doesn't provide much ability to modulate? Or?

I really like the part about low rotational mass, no brake dust and very low rotor wear, but rotor fragility is a bit of a downside. Opportunity for damage to the rotors when replacing tires seems like an accident waiting to happen.
the grippy experience is when first applying the brakes; it’s a pretty binary feel at first as you go from nothing to negative G. Once you are in the brake curve, they offer good feel.
Old 03-03-2018, 06:38 PM
  #23  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,867
Received 1,256 Likes on 588 Posts
Default

I have never understood the gripe about PCCB being too grippy/hard to modulate/problematic for heel-toe/etc. First brake application in a PCCB car, yes, I usually put a bit too much brake in. After that, the brakes are just better in every way and I never think about it again. Just a muscle memory change, and then everything you do is the same, but better.

I can see where the track hounds might prefer "tunability" with various pads—but few if any of those pads are great on the street.

PCCB has its downsides, to be sure (mostly cost- and risk-related). But for feel and function, I truly believe the "918" PCCB system available on the 981 GT4, select 991.1 models, and all 991.2s is one of the best brake systems ever equipped on a road car—and a bargain at $7400-9000~ compared to a lot of aftermarket systems out there, particularly considering the fact it was developed by Porsche and is covered under the new-car warranty for everything other than wear or damage.
Old 03-03-2018, 07:51 PM
  #24  
seapar
Three Wheelin'
 
seapar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I admit I only tracked the Turbo S that had ceramics only once. I had no problems with the ceramics on the 2007 GT3 older PCCB other than manual H/T on track.
Porsche's current brakes steel or PCCB are so good anyway in stopping power I stress in gridlock traffic due to inattentive drivers.
For the 18 GTS I wanted my MRSP to be < 140K. I also got 5 lug wheels too.
Old 03-03-2018, 07:52 PM
  #25  
jnolan
Pro
 
jnolan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Southwest Florida
Posts: 742
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I’m not sure I would call it a bargain

However, I do agree with the points you raise and would look for this option on future cars I buy. I am very interested to see how the PSCB system that Porsche developed will perform over the course of the first models to get it.
Old 03-04-2018, 09:49 PM
  #26  
RONGLOS
Racer
 
RONGLOS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 320
Received 28 Likes on 21 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jnolan
I’m not sure I would call it a bargain

However, I do agree with the points you raise and would look for this option on future cars I buy. I am very interested to see how the PSCB system that Porsche developed will perform over the course of the first models to get it.
I'm with you on that. I have strong feelings about changing to pcsb's in the future if they work out and it is possible. You must have 20" wheels to have the pcsb.
Old 04-19-2018, 05:44 PM
  #27  
Tz250
2nd Gear
 
Tz250's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looking to buy 997.2 911s. 2010 with PCCB. After researching on this forum and others I have concerns about the rotors ability to handle every day street hazards. Also was told they will not tolerate exposure to chemicals including tire/wheel cleaners. Am I overly concerned? Would appreciate the groups input.
Old 04-19-2018, 05:57 PM
  #28  
gellie
Rennlist Member
 
gellie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,098
Received 234 Likes on 116 Posts
Default

Miss mine that I had on my 997.2 Targa. Now have a 991.2 Cab S. Performance wise it’s pretty close for street driving. I miss the cool factor as well as the lack of break dust. However what I don’t miss is the constant worrying about hitting a pot hole and cracking the rotor , or sone dope slamming the rotor when changing tires.
Old 04-19-2018, 06:04 PM
  #29  
johnsopa
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
johnsopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,233
Received 187 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

[quote=stoutBut for feel and function, I truly believe the "918" PCCB system available on the 981 GT4, select 991.1 models, and all 991.2s is one of the best brake systems ever equipped on a road car—and a bargain at $7400-9000~ compared to a lot of aftermarket systems out there, particularly considering the fact it was developed by Porsche and is covered under the new-car warranty for everything other than wear or damage.[/quote]

Totally agree with this. Will never order a performance P-car without PCCBs going forward.
Old 04-19-2018, 06:05 PM
  #30  
johnsopa
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
johnsopa's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,233
Received 187 Likes on 137 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RDCR
I overheated the rear rotors a couple of times on track on the GT4 and lost 50% of the carbon density. Fronts were only down 10% after 17 track days so on the street they should last for a long time.
RDCR, did you have your rotors measured while on the car or when taken off?


Quick Reply: Experience with Porsche Ceramic Composite Brake option



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:06 PM.