When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Ok I've grown up reading car mags, love to read about the big dogs, Vipers, CGT, GT3, F40/50, Bugatti etc.. you name it. I'm in love with exotics and fast speedy cars.
However reality is, insurance, law enforcement, (my) driving skills, etc.. conspire to dampen my need for speed.
I'm not saying boo to anyone who likes to drive fast within reason, but just feel the saying mo money mo problems, can be changed to mo power mo problems.
I had S2000 (slower than) and E90 M3 (similar to) base 911, I've driven 911 Turbo, GT3, McLaren SLR, F430 on drivers experience street drive.
Of course the faster cars are fun but also I'd likely a) drive them slow (similar to S2000/M3 speeds) or b) likely get a lot of speeding tickets.
So whilst looking at GTS / GT3 got to thinking might be that I can have fun with a base 911 (almost as much fun) while saving a lot of money.
Likely without going to the race track, I'd probably do better buying a base engine. Missing out on the prestige of a bigger power car.
What's the consensus, does the base car feel underpowered? Do I need bigger turbos or more displacement to feel true happiness?
I have an 80 mile backroad loop with 8,000 feet of climbing and descending. S2000, 981 Cayman base, 996.2 GT3, 991.2 C2 MT, CBR600RR sportbike, and my Look 595 bicycle.
I have an 80 mile backroad loop with 8,000 feet of climbing and descending. S2000, 981 Cayman base, 996.2 GT3, 991.2 C2 MT, CBR600RR sportbike, and my Look 595 bicycle.
All are fun. Really fun.
likely while moving you don't miss the power as much and might miss the power more on acceleration from a stop(?). I like speed but don't want to go to jail. When driving a 911 Turbo was almost like the limits were so much higher than my S2000 it was like the car needed to be going 30 mph faster to feel the same fun as S2000.
Yes, an IMO accurate review by Ollie Marriage, head of car testing at Top Gear.
Originally Posted by rai
likely while moving you don't miss the power as much and might miss the power more on acceleration from a stop(?).
Actually I was worried that 991.2 C2 MT would have too much power for backroads. But I find the handling dynamics are so excellent that I have the confidence to use the power decisively and safely. More so than any other street car I have driven.
The 991.1 is more rewarding to push on the street than the 991.2 - the 991.2 is faster from a dig.
How a car with far less torque is more rewarding on the street I have no clue. You get much more of a push down low from the 991.2 meaning you don't have to rev it out to have fun.
This statement make no sense. The 991.2 is faster from a dig and from a roll as well. Ask the 991.1 C4S I just blew away.
Ok I've grown up reading car mags, love to read about the big dogs, Vipers, CGT, GT3, F40/50, Bugatti etc.. you name it. I'm in love with exotics and fast speedy cars.
However reality is, insurance, law enforcement, (my) driving skills, etc.. conspire to dampen my need for speed.
I'm not saying boo to anyone who likes to drive fast within reason, but just feel the saying mo money mo problems, can be changed to mo power mo problems.
I had S2000 (slower than) and E90 M3 (similar to) base 911, I've driven 911 Turbo, GT3, McLaren SLR, F430 on drivers experience street drive.
Of course the faster cars are fun but also I'd likely a) drive them slow (similar to S2000/M3 speeds) or b) likely get a lot of speeding tickets.
So whilst looking at GTS / GT3 got to thinking might be that I can have fun with a base 911 (almost as much fun) while saving a lot of money.
Likely without going to the race track, I'd probably do better buying a base engine. Missing out on the prestige of a bigger power car.
What's the consensus, does the base car feel underpowered? Do I need bigger turbos or more displacement to feel true happiness?
Someone might have trouble telling the difference between the 991.2 base and S anyway. They are that close.
If it bugs you, get sport cats and some bolt ons. If you really want to forget about it entirely, get a tune. The S will feel slow in comparison.
The engine is no longer the main deciding point. They are all the same. Even a GTS will lose to a tuned base car.
If power is the concern it's absolutely nothing to worry about.
Stunning Porsche 356A Super GT Speedster Auction Fails to Meet Reserve
Slideshow: One of the rarest Porsche 356 Speedsters ever built has resurfaced, offering a glimpse into a little-known chapter of the model's competition history.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.