Notices
991 Turbo 2012-2019 Turbo and Turbo S
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Road Spy

Tracking with PDCC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 29, 2025 | 05:55 PM
  #1  
flsupraguy's Avatar
flsupraguy
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
10 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 4,495
Likes: 1,957
Default Tracking with PDCC

For those that have PDCC fo you disable it when on track? Should I throw in the towel and just go Ohlins?
Reply
Old May 30, 2025 | 12:46 PM
  #2  
Bluemax2's Avatar
Bluemax2
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 471
Likes: 263
From: Arizona
Default

Great question — and a common one for those running PDCC (Porsche Dynamic Chassis Control) on track.

🏁 Short Answer:

No, most drivers do not disable PDCC on track. In fact, many find it beneficial — especially in high-speed corners and transitions — due to the reduced body roll and enhanced stability it provides.

🔍 More Detail:

Pros of keeping PDCC ON during track use:
  • Reduces body roll, keeping the car flatter in corners, which helps with weight transfer and predictability.
  • Improves cornering stability, especially in quick transitions like esses or chicanes.
  • Maximizes tire contact patch, particularly in heavier cars like the Turbo or Panamera.
Potential downside:
  • Some advanced drivers say PDCC can mask chassis feedback slightly, especially under extreme loads or in slower, technical sections.
  • Slight artificial feel in transitions for drivers used to fully mechanical setups.

Best Practice:

  • Try a session or two with it ON, and focus on what the car is telling you.
  • If your car allows disabling PDCC via PASM settings or with a controller (Cobb, CarPlay-based interface, etc.), try back-to-back comparisons if you're experienced and curious — but most find it's better left on, particularly on tracks with high-speed sweepers or elevation change (like Road America or COTA).
If you're running aftermarket sway bars or very aggressive suspension setups, that’s where disabling PDCC might make more sense — but for most, PDCC is an asset, not a liability.


Reply
Old May 30, 2025 | 03:59 PM
  #3  
Bluemax2's Avatar
Bluemax2
Rennlist Member
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 471
Likes: 263
From: Arizona
Default

If you're even thinking about Ohlins, you're probably already at the point where the stock suspension is holding you back — especially on a 991.1 Turbo S. Here's a breakdown to help you decide if it’s time to make the leap:

🔧 Ohlins vs Stock 991.1 Turbo S Suspension

Ohlins (e.g., Road & Track or TTX):

  • Customizable damping & rebound (dual- or single-adjustable depending on spec)
  • Significantly better feedback & body control on track
  • Height adjustable, so you can fine-tune rake, corner balance, etc.
  • Lighter weight than OEM PASM dampers
  • Improves tire wear and heat control with better weight transfer management
  • Can be spec’d with spring rates suited to your tire choice & use case (e.g., Cup2 vs AD09 vs slicks)
  • Highly rebuildable and tunable over time

🚫 Downsides:

  • No PASM integration, so you lose in-cabin adjustability
  • More NVH (especially if spring rates or damping isn’t street-optimized)
  • Initial setup matters a lot — corner balance, alignment, preload, damping all need proper tuning or it won’t feel “right”
  • Can be overkill for pure street use unless you’re okay with a firmer ride

🆚 Stock PASM Setup (with PDCC):

  • Very competent for a dual-purpose street car — plush when needed, decent control in Sport/Sport Plus
  • Integrates with drive modes, active damping is quick to react
  • Tuned to balance comfort and grip for OEM tire sizes and geometry
  • Works well on mild track setups or fast canyon carving
  • Not bad until you're pushing >8/10ths regularly or running 200TW or R-compounds and seeing IAT/brake/roll limitations

💭 Consider This:

If you’re doing:
  • 5+ HPDEs a year
  • Running sticky tires (AD09s, CR-S, Cup 2 R, etc.)
  • Getting annoyed by body movement, pitch/dive, or traction loss on mid-corner bumps
  • Already upgraded sway bars, bushings, camber plates, etc.
→ Then yes, go Ohlins. It’s transformative — especially on the Turbo, which is inherently heavy and rewards chassis control.

🛠️ Recommendation:

  • Ohlins R&T if you're 60% street / 40% track
  • Ohlins TTX or similar motorsport setup if you're 70%+ track-focused
  • Pair with adjustable camber plates (Tarett or similar) and a solid alignment for best results
  • If you're not ready to lose PASM, consider Bilstein Clubsport (still firm, but retains some PASM integration in 991.1)
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2025 | 02:44 PM
  #4  
RSBro's Avatar
RSBro
Burning Brakes
5 Year Member
 
Joined: Nov 2017
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 306
From: The Woodlands, TX
Default

I've learned to leave mine on, per advice from an advanced instructor at my last event. He used to have a 996 TT that he'd track, and gave me a lot of good insight on how to make this platform go even faster, one of which is leaving PDCC on. My 'local' track is pretty bumpy and I definitely found that having a softer ride improved control and lap times. I probably could turn it off on a smoother, grand prix track like COTA, but I'll test that theory at the next event which I believe is in November this year.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2025 | 03:31 PM
  #5  
Miykl's Avatar
Miykl
Advanced
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 37
From: Franklin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Bluemax2
  • If you're not ready to lose PASM, consider Bilstein Clubsport (still firm, but retains some PASM integration in 991.1)
I just read that the Bilstein Clubsports arent compatable with PDCC. (?)

Curious on thoughts of Tractive VS the Bilstein CS?
Reply




All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:14 AM.