RS separation anxiety
#17
That's a little harsh I'd say. I've had zero issues with my RS. And with it being CPO I have 6 years/100k miles of coverage, just in case.
#19
My opinion is slightly different. If trading your RS (not discussing $) for a .2 GT3 "allows" you to guarantee an allocation for the .2RS, then it may be worth it.
The .2RS engine will most likely be based on the .2GT3 which is undisputedly BETTER than the .1RS. Therefore if you have subscribed to the concept that the RS is the ultimate GT car for you, then the .2RS would be the ultimate goal and THIS would trump all interim decisions.
The .2RS engine will most likely be based on the .2GT3 which is undisputedly BETTER than the .1RS. Therefore if you have subscribed to the concept that the RS is the ultimate GT car for you, then the .2RS would be the ultimate goal and THIS would trump all interim decisions.
#20
#21
Why get rid of the RS now for a GT3? there will always be a car for sale and if your willing to be patient for the new 3 or RS just wait for one to be available. unless you have this need to be one of the first which will die down faster then you think.
#22
I agree with most here. I wouldn't trade an RS for a GT3. I would keep the RS to trade for the .2RS. Also I wouldn't risk anything on a dealer future promise. Sales people and managers come and go, even dealership owners change. I pre-traded my GT3 in for my RS and wouldn't do that again either. I'll keep the old one until the new one arrives. I'm sure I would have been bumped up the .2GT3 list if I traded my RS but I passed. I'll wait for a .2 to come up or move straight to a .2RS
#23
The official issue is Andreas needed half a gen to deliver Mezger level quality and I'd hazard a guess he has based on initial reviews. Superior crankshaft, oiling system, lighter components and actually used in the cup cars... I'm sold. It's as significant an improvement as the M96 to GT1 engines back in the 996/7 days. The market will voice its opinion as it always does.
#24
One other option worth considering depending on $$ availability: Keep RS and get the .2GT3 as well and trade the .1RS when the new.2RS is out. My plan is to keep the .2GT3 and add the RS depending on how well I do financially over the next year. This way I have the MT and the new RS. Now back to work to earn those $$'s
#25
Perhaps, but there are some pretty special cup car level improvements to the .2 engine that are so much more than having "zero issues".
The official issue is Andreas needed half a gen to deliver Mezger level quality and I'd hazard a guess he has based on initial reviews. Superior crankshaft, oiling system, lighter components and actually used in the cup cars... I'm sold. It's as significant an improvement as the M96 to GT1 engines back in the 996/7 days. The market will voice its opinion as it always does.
The official issue is Andreas needed half a gen to deliver Mezger level quality and I'd hazard a guess he has based on initial reviews. Superior crankshaft, oiling system, lighter components and actually used in the cup cars... I'm sold. It's as significant an improvement as the M96 to GT1 engines back in the 996/7 days. The market will voice its opinion as it always does.
When did ANYONE profess in any official capacity that "Andreas needed half a gen to deliver Mezger level quality" - ? And how would the initial reviews provide an assessment of such ostensible quality and, uh, longevity?
I wonder how Porsche tricked all of those idiot gentleman drivers who just bought a nearly $200K Cup Car into servicing the engine at 100 hour intervals when the road car allegedly has the exact same engine
The GT1 engine existed before the M96 / M97 and outlasted the more prosaic engine; furthermore, it was never used as a substitute or replacement. They coexisted.
#27
I would trade RS for RS. I can keep my RS and get a GT3 at MSRP, but I prefer my RS. Not concerned with performance upgrades because they will always happen. Will not trade a perfectly good car just to have a .2 GT3 to only move when the RS is released????