Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Camber question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-13-2016, 11:54 PM
  #1  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default Camber question

Took my car to a local race shop for corner balance and track alignment. They measured the camber and told me it was already set up well, especially for Sebring with more negative camber on the front left. They made no changes.

Front camber: left -3.0/ right -2.8
Rear camber: left -2.7/ right -2.7

This seems fine but I have been under the car and there are no shims in the front control arms. Is this front camber measurement even possible without shims? I've read the threads about geo set up and thought the car wouldn't go beyond -2.

Thinking about taking the car to another shop for a second opinion.
Old 03-13-2016, 11:55 PM
  #2  
MileHigh911
Three Wheelin'
 
MileHigh911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,486
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Are you the original owner?
Old 03-14-2016, 12:03 AM
  #3  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

No I am the second owner and was told the prior owner did not track the car, so I assumed it had a stock setup. I am happy that it is already where I wanted it, if I can believe the readings.
Old 03-14-2016, 12:39 AM
  #4  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

The max that my alignment shop could get in front was -2.5....
Old 03-14-2016, 12:43 AM
  #5  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,344
Received 1,596 Likes on 739 Posts
Default

FWIW, I'm running the same camber numbers.
Old 03-14-2016, 04:36 AM
  #6  
krisa9977
Instructor
 
krisa9977's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 133
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CDinSing
Took my car to a local race shop for corner balance and track alignment. They measured the camber and told me it was already set up well, especially for Sebring with more negative camber on the front left. They made no changes.

Front camber: left -3.0/ right -2.8
Rear camber: left -2.7/ right -2.7

This seems fine but I have been under the car and there are no shims in the front control arms. Is this front camber measurement even possible without shims? I've read the threads about geo set up and thought the car wouldn't go beyond -2.

Thinking about taking the car to another shop for a second opinion.
It is absolutely not possible to have -3.0 without shims! If they set up minimum possible right height, you can might get maybe -2. With standard right height not even that much.
Old 03-14-2016, 10:17 AM
  #7  
CDinSing
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CDinSing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Melbourne, Florida
Posts: 747
Received 168 Likes on 75 Posts
Default

Thanks for the confirmation guys! Looks like those are the numbers I want but a figment of someone's imagination on my car at the moment. So I am headed to another shop for a set up.
Old 03-14-2016, 05:32 PM
  #8  
tqevo
Pro
 
tqevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 677
Likes: 0
Received 149 Likes on 82 Posts
Default

I maxed my camber without shims... could not get to 3 but ~2.5 was doable
Old 03-14-2016, 08:19 PM
  #9  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,423
Received 1,007 Likes on 518 Posts
Default

My car stock with no shims maxed out on one side at -2.2 so that is where both were set. -1.8 rear both sides.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:45 AM
  #10  
CRex
Rennlist Member
 
CRex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Driver's Seat
Posts: 3,578
Received 381 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

OP you'd want to check and see if the strut tops have already been rotated. I don't know the 991s but back in the 997s a high-2 camber is possible just by rotating the tops.
Old 03-15-2016, 02:58 AM
  #11  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 127 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CRex
OP you'd want to check and see if the strut tops have already been rotated. I don't know the 991s but back in the 997s a high-2 camber is possible just by rotating the tops.
The alignment expert at my dealership told me that, unlike the 997, the strut tops on the 991 couldn't be rotated.

BTW, I'd like to correct my earlier post. I checked my paperwork and the max negative camber I got at the front was -2.2; not -2.5. Memory glitch....
Old 03-15-2016, 09:08 AM
  #12  
Mika911
Racer
 
Mika911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: London
Posts: 487
Received 34 Likes on 25 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
FWIW, I'm running the same camber numbers.
Did you manage that without alterations to the wheel housing at the back?

I just booked a track geo for my RS with the Black Falcon race team in Nürburg. They have a couple of road GT3's and one RS. I was told that they could not achieve ideal camber, which they reckon is 3, on the rear due to the 21 inch wheels. They have been testing at Ascari and Portimao over the winter and were able to get much more performance and tyre durability from the std GT3 because the car allows more camber at the back. They are now looking into how to address this, but expect it cannot be achieved without altering the wheel housing.
Old 03-15-2016, 09:14 AM
  #13  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,344
Received 1,596 Likes on 739 Posts
Default

No modifications?

-2.7 rear is fine for Dunlops, -3 would maybe needed for Michelins due to only the outside of the MPSC2 wearing.

A big help is running the car stiff PASM and IMHO the rear sway bar should be full stiff for max tire wear and a more stable car at hight speed cornering.

Porsche did install new front fender liners, now no rubbing with -3 front.
Old 03-15-2016, 09:31 AM
  #14  
GT3Bang
Advanced
 
GT3Bang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
No modifications?

-2.7 rear is fine for Dunlops, -3 would maybe needed for Michelins due to only the outside of the MPSC2 wearing.

A big help is running the car stiff PASM and IMHO the rear sway bar should be full stiff for max tire wear and a more stable car at hight speed cornering.

Porsche did install new front fender liners, now no rubbing with -3 front.
Do you know if the "new" front fender liners Porsche has installed on your car is different than front fender liners the car came with ?
Old 03-15-2016, 09:36 AM
  #15  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,344
Received 1,596 Likes on 739 Posts
Default

Yes different.

Most obvious and maybe only change is the new indentations by the corner lights.
On my old straight liners that's where the biggest holes were.


Quick Reply: Camber question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:57 PM.