Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Autocar: McLaren 675LT versus GT3 RS

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2015, 03:30 PM
  #46  
hf1
Rennlist Member
 
hf1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Northeast
Posts: 10,392
Likes: 0
Received 1,639 Likes on 1,122 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit

Can we also see the GT3 face-off from the upper right corner?
Old 08-09-2015, 04:07 PM
  #47  
991 3Turbo
Racer
 
991 3Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tre
I really hope these kind of comparisons don't make it very difficult for Porsche in the long term. F/I is always going to give a leg up in the HP wars which would make Porsche's GT N/A HP figures look bad to the magazine tech spec racers. I know there have been interviews by AP saying that GT cars will always be N/A, but technological advancements really help the HP wars because F/I car owners can brag about their cars tech specs AND keep it in check w/ use of nannies (e.g., C7 Z06 noob HPDE vid). Look at this thread and others like it where a lot of RLs turn to those HP & tourqe numbers. Can the flat 6 keep up with this long term?

Second point, what happens when the combo of F/I and electronics surpass Porsche's amazing ability to be the David to those high HP Goliaths? I mean, Porsche has already been pressured to go PDK-S and RWS to keep itself level with the competition. What happens when the 488 version of the CS/Scud/Speciale is released? Has the 675LT begun to put some writing on the wall? The future direction of the 911 GT models will be interesting to say the least.
I think the 675 and the 488 ARE the writing on the wall. With Ferrari's extensive boost management software making their forced induction seem very N/A feeling, I think they have upped the ante quite a bit. Chris Harris liked the car very much and was astounded by its pace

We shall see, especially if they can make it sound good. Mac definitely sounds good!
Old 08-09-2015, 07:24 PM
  #48  
Zeus
Rennlist Member
 
Zeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Washington State
Posts: 382
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tre
I really hope these kind of comparisons don't make it very difficult for Porsche in the long term. F/I is always going to give a leg up in the HP wars which would make Porsche's GT N/A HP figures look bad to the magazine tech spec racers. I know there have been interviews by AP saying that GT cars will always be N/A, but technological advancements really help the HP wars because F/I car owners can brag about their cars tech specs AND keep it in check w/ use of nannies (e.g., C7 Z06 noob HPDE vid). Look at this thread and others like it where a lot of RLs turn to those HP & tourqe numbers. Can the flat 6 keep up with this long term?

Second point, what happens when the combo of F/I and electronics surpass Porsche's amazing ability to be the David to those high HP Goliaths? I mean, Porsche has already been pressured to go PDK-S and RWS to keep itself level with the competition. What happens when the 488 version of the CS/Scud/Speciale is released? Has the 675LT begun to put some writing on the wall? The future direction of the 911 GT models will be interesting to say the least.
I think any true performance car enthusiast worth their salt absolutely understands the David vs. Goliath nature of comparisons such as this in relation to any 911 GT Porsche vs the competition.

I love the fact that we are even discussing these facts. Because on paper, the McLaren looks far, fare superior, and it is, but the GT3RS has it's own unique performance enhancing attributes that make it more than competitive with a car costing twice as much & is nearly as special overall as a whole.

The fact that this is making it difficult for Porsche is a Godsend to the enthusiast community. Imagine what Porsche may have on the drawing board, if it decides to enter the marketplace with the 960/988 - a supposed mid-engine competitor to the 488/P14(650S replacement).

The "real" test here, or a future test where everything being equal, would have been the 675 vs. 488 vs. 960. In the future it may be something similar to a "P14"LT vs. 488 Speciale vs. the 960.

My hope would be Porsche goes NA with the 960, even if it had less overall power than the competition (just like the RS) but would ultimately have a more "special" engine - especially if it were based on the 918's V8 or something similar. They will probably go with a twin or quad turbo flat-8 though. That is the rumor at least...

And the future 911 GTs? Perhaps they really will stay NA. We don't hear Ford talking about in the future, hybridizing their new flat-plane 8,250 5.2 V8 in the new GT350.
Old 08-09-2015, 07:55 PM
  #49  
Ronan
Rennlist Member
 
Ronan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,727
Received 110 Likes on 66 Posts
Default

I believe 960 is Quad turbo, flat 8, a modular development of the 9A1.
Old 08-09-2015, 10:01 PM
  #50  
991 3Turbo
Racer
 
991 3Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Zeus
I think any true performance car enthusiast worth their salt absolutely understands the David vs. Goliath nature of comparisons such as this in relation to any 911 GT Porsche vs the competition.

I love the fact that we are even discussing these facts. Because on paper, the McLaren looks far, fare superior, and it is, but the GT3RS has it's own unique performance enhancing attributes that make it more than competitive with a car costing twice as much & is nearly as special overall as a whole.

The fact that this is making it difficult for Porsche is a Godsend to the enthusiast community. Imagine what Porsche may have on the drawing board, if it decides to enter the marketplace with the 960/988 - a supposed mid-engine competitor to the 488/P14(650S replacement).

The "real" test here, or a future test where everything being equal, would have been the 675 vs. 488 vs. 960. In the future it may be something similar to a "P14"LT vs. 488 Speciale vs. the 960.

My hope would be Porsche goes NA with the 960, even if it had less overall power than the competition (just like the RS) but would ultimately have a more "special" engine - especially if it were based on the 918's V8 or something similar. They will probably go with a twin or quad turbo flat-8 though. That is the rumor at least...

And the future 911 GTs? Perhaps they really will stay NA. We don't hear Ford talking about in the future, hybridizing their new flat-plane 8,250 5.2 V8 in the new GT350.
Fords REAL race stuff will continue to be twin turbo products. Also supposedly is the next GT500. We will wait and see, but Ecoboost products are now synonymous with Ford.
Old 08-09-2015, 10:13 PM
  #51  
Tre
Racer
 
Tre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The addition of another tiered car (960/988) would definitely put the 911 GT cars in a niche market. If not, what competition class would it fall in? Essentially the hardcore variant of the 488 and the next version of the 650S would be by default a tier above if the (most likely) more expensive 960/988 falls into their tier. So would the 911 GT cars be paired with R8s (possibly to become F/I?), Z06s (nothing new here), NSXs (Vegas dealer quotes $150k MSRP), GTRs (although the R36 will go the same route as the NSX with some batteries), etc? Those definitely aren't the marquees that Porsche tends to class itself with as those manufacturers instead tend to baseline their performance off of Porsche.

I agree that evolution of the industry is fun and amazing, unless you're an "old school" purist who revolts against pretty much anything that's been developed over the last decade or so And that's honestly not a shot at anyone for I can and always will appreciate every segment and era of automobiles.
Old 08-09-2015, 10:16 PM
  #52  
mainly
Racer
 
mainly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: edmonton, alberta, canada
Posts: 462
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
Because lap times don't matter. And that's it.

Want proof?

Do you have a Viper ACR in the garage or a GT3?
yes but this is the gt3rs.

there should be no excuses, certainly not against a viper acr!!! which is way less expensive than the rs let alone the maclaren.

it should be basically undefeated on track, thats the whole point of the car isnt it? its certainly too ridiculous looking to drive on the street.
Old 08-09-2015, 10:33 PM
  #53  
fstockcarrera
Rennlist Member
 
fstockcarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Schenectady NY
Posts: 844
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I had the opportunity to drive back to back a 2015 GT3 and a 04 996 cup last Saturday. First to ask which street car is a better track car is well really ridiculous as all street cars are a compromise and none are that good at the track. They are fine at the track as a novice but not beyond. Buy the street car that suits your fancy but leave it in the garage and buy a track car. BTW a $75k 04 996 GT3 cup is 6 seconds faster then a stock 2015 GT3, at Lime Rock Park, a 1.53mile track. Street cars are heavy and too softly sprung to push them properly to their limits. IMO
Old 08-09-2015, 10:42 PM
  #54  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,854
Likes: 0
Received 11,528 Likes on 5,055 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fstockcarrera
I had the opportunity to drive back to back a 2015 GT3 and a 04 996 cup last Saturday. First to ask which street car is a better track car is well really ridiculous as all street cars are a compromise and none are that good at the track. They are fine at the track as a novice but not beyond. Buy the street car that suits your fancy but leave it in the garage and buy a track car. BTW a $75k 04 996 GT3 cup is 6 seconds faster then a stock 2015 GT3, at Lime Rock Park, a 1.53mile track. Street cars are heavy and too softly sprung to push them properly to their limits. IMO
I don't necessarily disagree with you.

But your answer is a solution to a question that was never posed. At least not in this thread.

Because we're talking about street legal cars that also shine on the track.
Old 08-09-2015, 11:03 PM
  #55  
fstockcarrera
Rennlist Member
 
fstockcarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Schenectady NY
Posts: 844
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ipse dixit
I don't necessarily disagree with you.

But your answer is a solution to a question that was never posed. At least not in this thread.

Because we're talking about street legal cars that also shine on the track.
My opinion is they Don't "shine at the track" My point. My perspective.
Old 08-09-2015, 11:45 PM
  #56  
Drifting
Rennlist Member
 
Drifting's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Rocky Mountains
Posts: 5,153
Received 1,289 Likes on 679 Posts
Default

Not everyone wants to spend the money necessary to run a Cup car.

Driving your GT3/RS to the track, and watching it hold its value compared to a cup car, are why GT cars are so popular.

Last edited by Drifting; 08-09-2015 at 11:48 PM. Reason: .
Old 08-09-2015, 11:57 PM
  #57  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Drifting
Not everyone wants to spend the money necessary to run a Cup car.

Driving your GT3/RS to the track, and watching it hold its value compared to a cup car, are why GT cars are so popular.
It's a myth that running a 996 CUP is any more expensive than a 996 GT3 street car. It's the same car.

Just because your street car's owner's manual doesn't give you a engine lifetime in hours doesn't mean that its any more resilient than the comparable race car.

The majority of GT3 street cars that are heavily tracked are simply inadequately maintained.
Old 08-10-2015, 12:05 AM
  #58  
Serge944
Rennlist Member
 
Serge944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
Posts: 8,022
Likes: 0
Received 55 Likes on 29 Posts
Default

Back to the topic at hand, the only serious european track car is the Porsche GT family.

This is because a track car's worth isn't just the lap times it produces. It's the community/knowledge base that comes with it - alignment setting, roll bar installation suggestions, maintenance and service information, aftermarket consumable performance, etc, etc, etc. This doesn't exist with any other high end european marque.

My McLaren was the best car I've ever owned, but I wouldn't buy it for a dedicated track car, because that marque doesn't come with the "complete package," regardless of how good it is on track.
Old 08-10-2015, 12:35 AM
  #59  
fstockcarrera
Rennlist Member
 
fstockcarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Schenectady NY
Posts: 844
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
It's a myth that running a 996 CUP is any more expensive than a 996 GT3 street car. It's the same car.

Just because your street car's owner's manual doesn't give you a engine lifetime in hours doesn't mean that its any more resilient than the comparable race car.

The majority of GT3 street cars that are heavily tracked are simply inadequately maintained.
Well yes and no. The engine 996-7 is bullet proof and will sustain just about any miss shift or over rev. But running slicks with consistent 1.7-1.9 cornering G's takes it toll on components. Yes it is the same cars but the cost are not for the faint of heart and only remotely similar under race conditions on slicks.

I love the new GT3's but they are not really suitable for the track as is other than the occasional track day. The Best street car to date that Porsche has built, i agree. But, 2015 GT3 will have a hard time keeping up with a well driven track set up, Carrera or 964, drivers being equal, certainly not in the corners. Sounds insane but that's reality as I know it having experience in all of them.

Yes most track cars are not maintained properly and are repaired when components fail instead of when they time out.

Still the new GT3's are beautiful cars but asking which casual sneakers are best to take to the local 5K, or how well this knife performs when compared to a gun is naive at best.

Love the new GT3's all the same
Old 08-10-2015, 12:44 AM
  #60  
fstockcarrera
Rennlist Member
 
fstockcarrera's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Schenectady NY
Posts: 844
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Serge944
Back to the topic at hand, the only serious european track car is the Porsche GT family.

This is because a track car's worth isn't just the lap times it produces. It's the community/knowledge base that comes with it - alignment setting, roll bar installation suggestions, maintenance and service information, aftermarket consumable performance, etc, etc, etc. This doesn't exist with any other high end european marque.

My McLaren was the best car I've ever owned, but I wouldn't buy it for a dedicated track car, because that marque doesn't come with the "complete package," regardless of how good it is on track.
^^^^
This


Quick Reply: Autocar: McLaren 675LT versus GT3 RS



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:45 AM.