Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Significance of Torque Vectoring?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-15-2013, 09:54 AM
  #1  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,994
Received 4,325 Likes on 2,460 Posts
Default Significance of Torque Vectoring?

This talk about how easy the 991 GT3 is to drive, potential loss of involvement, role of driver aids, etc. has gotten me thinking more about the torque vectoring. Seems to me that this may play a large role in the car's turn in and cornering, and AFIK the torque vectoring can't be turned off (whereas PSM can). If my understanding of the role of torque vectoring is correct, I find that to be troubling step in the direction of the GT-R. And it must be acknowledged the new Vette also has torque vectoring (which I suspect can't be turned off either, but I could be wrong).

Thoughts?
Old 09-15-2013, 10:28 AM
  #2  
Bluehinder
Burning Brakes
 
Bluehinder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,005
Received 18 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Why are you troubled?
Old 09-15-2013, 10:58 AM
  #3  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PTV includes the e-diff. Makes sense to me that it cannot be turned off.
Old 09-15-2013, 11:16 AM
  #4  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,994
Received 4,325 Likes on 2,460 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bluehinder
Why are you troubled?
Because a key challenge of driving is getting the car through and out of corners quickly, and PTV seems like 'cheating'. Outside of racing, driving on the track is about having fun for nearly all of us, not about 'being the fastest', and the fun is enhanced when a car presents sensible challenges to the driver (eg, the driving technique needed for a 997).

All of this was brought home to me when I drove a '14 Cayman S PDK on track yesterday, set in Sport Plus automated mode. The car was fast and indeed easy to drive, nearly no learning curve, just get out there and go. The car was also always in the right gear, so I just listened to the blipping sounds, but otherwise ignored the shifting. Maybe driving it in manual mode would have made it more fun, but what I experienced was a bit boring compared to what I'm used to with tracking mainly a manual 997S and Cayman R. This doesn't bode well as far as tracking a 991 GT3. 997 GT3 is starting to look better (or 996 cup, etc.).
Old 09-15-2013, 11:30 AM
  #5  
991 3Turbo
Racer
 
991 3Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: West Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Its all cheating. Buy a 1970's 911 and be done with it. You can "control" it all you like. Full control. Full driver "involvement" . Forget all modern advancements. Old, simple, and slow, and by the way more dangerous. Have at it. Just not many of the rest of us want such. By the way get a manual also. Why get the 991? Why even think or research about it if all we do is complain how advanced it is?

Simple.
Old 09-15-2013, 11:46 AM
  #6  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

In that recent interview with Walter Rohl, I thought his comments interesting. He commented multiple times and in multiple ways how the car was so easy to drive, that the only way to go off track was to steer it off track. Despite those comments, he was grinning ear to ear about the car.

When asked about his personal favorite cars, he cited his 964 RS "no ABS, no electronic aids, just me and the car" or something like that.

He, like a lot of us, are torn on the subject. I think there are two answers to this question: own the best of both worlds, a 991 GT3 and an aircooled car of your choice, or choose the point along the technology continuum where you are comfortable with the balance of technology v. driver. For many, that may be the 997 chassis.

But that's OK. To each his own.

Personally, I'll likely always have two sports cars in the garage. Just like one boat can't do it all, so I have two (though 3 would be ideal).
Old 09-15-2013, 11:50 AM
  #7  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,994
Received 4,325 Likes on 2,460 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
In that recent interview with Walter Rohl, I thought his comments interesting. He commented multiple times and in multiple ways how the car was so easy to drive, that the only way to go off track was to steer it off track. Despite those comments, he was grinning ear to ear about the car.

When asked about his personal favorite cars, he cited his 964 RS "no ABS, no electronic aids, just me and the car" or something like that.

He, like a lot of us, are torn on the subject. I think there are two answers to this question: own the best of both worlds, a 991 GT3 and an aircooled car of your choice, or choose the point along the technology continuum where you are comfortable with the balance of technology v. driver. For many, that may be the 997 chassis.

But that's OK. To each his own.

Personally, I'll likely always have two sports cars in the garage. Just like one boat can't do it all, so I have two (though 3 would be ideal).
+ 1 million

I agree with 100% of what you said.
Old 09-15-2013, 11:51 AM
  #8  
roberga
Nordschleife Master
 
roberga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: SEATTLE
Posts: 5,165
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
In that recent interview with Walter Rohl, I thought his comments interesting. He commented multiple times and in multiple ways how the car was so easy to drive, that the only way to go off track was to steer it off track. Despite those comments, he was grinning ear to ear about the car.

When asked about his personal favorite cars, he cited his 964 RS "no ABS, no electronic aids, just me and the car" or something like that.

He, like a lot of us, are torn on the subject. I think there are two answers to this question: own the best of both worlds, a 991 GT3 and an aircooled car of your choice, or choose the point along the technology continuum where you are comfortable with the balance of technology v. driver. For many, that may be the 997 chassis.

But that's OK. To each his own.

Personally, I'll likely always have two sports cars in the garage. Just like one boat can't do it all, so I have two (though 3 would be ideal).
I think the equation is: proper number to own= n+1; where N= number currently owned. In cycling the minimum value of N is 3.
Old 09-15-2013, 12:21 PM
  #9  
frayed
Race Car
 
frayed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,972
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roberga
I think the equation is: proper number to own= n+1; where N= number currently owned. In cycling the minimum value of N is 3.
LOL. But your equation is incomplete. For those of us married, you forgot the Wife variable, W.

So N + 1 + W, where W = number of kids - (how much play you get/week * Q)

Q ranges from 0.1 to 1 and is average rating of quality of play.
Old 09-15-2013, 12:25 PM
  #10  
Suzy991
Burning Brakes
 
Suzy991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by frayed
In that recent interview with Walter Rohl, I thought his comments interesting. He commented multiple times and in multiple ways how the car was so easy to drive, that the only way to go off track was to steer it off track. Despite those comments, he was grinning ear to ear about the car.

When asked about his personal favorite cars, he cited his 964 RS "no ABS, no electronic aids, just me and the car" or something like that.

He, like a lot of us, are torn on the subject. I think there are two answers to this question: own the best of both worlds, a 991 GT3 and an aircooled car of your choice, or choose the point along the technology continuum where you are comfortable with the balance of technology v. driver. For many, that may be the 997 chassis.

But that's OK. To each his own.

Personally, I'll likely always have two sports cars in the garage. Just like one boat can't do it all, so I have two (though 3 would be ideal).
Fully agree! That's exactly how it is.
BTW, in a Dutch car magazine, I read an article where Walter Röhrl explains that the GT3 has one button to switch all the nannies off. For people that are confident enough, that's the way to experince the car in its most natural form. He litterally said: The 991 GT3 makes an avarage driver good, a good driver better and a very experienced driver happy.

Suzy991
Old 09-15-2013, 12:31 PM
  #11  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 12,994
Received 4,325 Likes on 2,460 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Suzy991
Fully agree! That's exactly how it is.
BTW, in a Dutch car magazine, I read an article where Walter Röhrl explains that the GT3 has one button to switch all the nannies off. For people that are confident enough, that's the way to experince the car in its most natural form. He litterally said: The 991 GT3 makes an avarage driver good, a good driver better and a very experienced driver happy.

Suzy991
It can't be all of them. ABS, power steering, PDK, and RWS are always there, and I suspect e-diff and PTV too. It could be debated which aids are 'nannies'.
Old 09-15-2013, 12:46 PM
  #12  
chuckbdc
Race Car
 
chuckbdc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Maryland USA
Posts: 3,591
Received 320 Likes on 193 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
It can't be all of them. ABS, power steering, PDK, and RWS are always there, and I suspect e-diff and PTV too. It could be debated which aids are 'nannies'.
Did you check off the bias-ply tire option?
Old 09-15-2013, 01:03 PM
  #13  
Suzy991
Burning Brakes
 
Suzy991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold

It can't be all of them. ABS, power steering, PDK, and RWS are always there, and I suspect e-diff and PTV too. It could be debated which aids are 'nannies'.
I don't see ABS, Power steering, PDK as nannies (anymore) I'm born in the age where power steering and ABS are common on almost every car (the year the Porsche 911celebrated its 25th anniversary). I don't know exactly if the PTV and e-diff do switch off though... You could be right. It's indeed debateable which aids should be classified as "nannies" haha

Suzy991
Old 09-15-2013, 02:05 PM
  #14  
Mike in CA
Race Director
 
Mike in CA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: North Bay Area, CA
Posts: 11,969
Received 128 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

My Cayenne S has PTV. FWIW, in that application it can't be switched off.

Since the e-diff is an integral part of the gearbox, I'd be very surprised if it could be switched off either, although just as with a mechanical LSD, I don't know why you'd want to......
Old 09-15-2013, 02:23 PM
  #15  
Suzy991
Burning Brakes
 
Suzy991's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 796
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Have been reading that article again and I think that Walter Röhrl just means the PSM when he says that you can switch the "nannies" off.

It's always a question how a journalist interprets an answer and how he writes it down, translated to his own language.

Suzy991


Quick Reply: Significance of Torque Vectoring?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:09 PM.