991 GT3 sans rear wing???
#61
Race Director
#66
I love the look. With that big splitter up front intact, however, I'd be very afraid on the autobahn. Too much front downforce is not fun...
#70
Race Director
#71
Ducktails are not as effective as you might think. The original cut rear lift nearly in half. Sounds good until you realize a GT3's rear wing makes significant downforce...
#74
From Sport Auto's Supertests, downforce at 124 mph:
991S: 4.4 lbs front/ 0 lbs rear (spoiler extended)
991 GT3: 40 lbs front/ 64 lbs rear
991 Turbo S: 44 lbs front/ 88 lbs rear
When you change one end you effect the other. For example adding a wing to the back will cause the car to change rake, potentially causing the front to nose-up and increase lift. I would expect the GT3 without the rear wing to nose down at the front substantially, increasing front downforce further and make more than the 40 lbs at 124 mph quoted above. Also downforce goes to the square of the speed, so I could easily see a GT3 with only a rear spoiler making 150 lbs more downforce on the front vs the rear near terminal velocity. Which would be bad...
991S: 4.4 lbs front/ 0 lbs rear (spoiler extended)
991 GT3: 40 lbs front/ 64 lbs rear
991 Turbo S: 44 lbs front/ 88 lbs rear
When you change one end you effect the other. For example adding a wing to the back will cause the car to change rake, potentially causing the front to nose-up and increase lift. I would expect the GT3 without the rear wing to nose down at the front substantially, increasing front downforce further and make more than the 40 lbs at 124 mph quoted above. Also downforce goes to the square of the speed, so I could easily see a GT3 with only a rear spoiler making 150 lbs more downforce on the front vs the rear near terminal velocity. Which would be bad...