Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

No 6 speed in the GT3. Ugh.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-06-2013 | 12:09 PM
  #61  
Carlo_Carrera's Avatar
Carlo_Carrera
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 11,599
Likes: 2,700
From: Nearby
Default

Originally Posted by AGO
... but that rear wheel steering ... It wonder if is strong enough for serious track time... And how predictable or linear it may be as you rotate the car ...
I agree, I want to see a lot of track miles on that system before I am a believer.
Old 03-06-2013 | 12:10 PM
  #62  
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 41,951
Likes: 1,819
From: Carjackistan
Default

Originally Posted by Carlo_Carrera
As someone else pointed out you have contradicted your earlier post. You may think using an H patten manual is more involving. I don't.

Using an H pattern shifter is a dying and unnecessary excise. As I wrote the Brumos car is using a sequential manual, not even an H patten. If you are teaching people to use an H patten transmission on a race track you might as well be practicing jousting. It might be enjoyable to you but it isn't really productive in the larger scheme of things.

That said I do enjoy using the H patten manual in my 356 but in a track focused car there is just no reason for it. Different tools for different jobs.
Where do you come up with this stuff?

And again, why are you comparing a Rolex Cup car with a street GT3??? The only things they have in common are body shell & windshield...and manufacturer.
Old 03-06-2013 | 12:19 PM
  #63  
Mvez's Avatar
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,683
Likes: 297
From: Louisville, KY
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
I think the undertone in that video of Preuninger is that they were indeed chasing the GTR - that car humiliated Porsche. In many ways they didn't have a choice but to go 4WS, PDK, and Torque vectoring, while still making a streetable car.

I'm glad we didn't end up with a turbo.
Uh, they already have a 911 Turbo, and that's exactly where all this **** belonged, because the Turbo is the true GTR competitor. The GT3 is simply the "it" car, so they've instead used it's popularity as a showcase for the new gimmicks. They even admitted that 4-wheel steering was intended for the 991 Turbo, but they couldn't help themselves.

Sadly, the Turbo will also have all this crap, which is pointless and too much overlap between the 911 models from a technology & philosophy standpoint, IMO.

What's the point of 100 different 911 models if they all have the same crap.
Old 03-06-2013 | 12:21 PM
  #64  
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 41,951
Likes: 1,819
From: Carjackistan
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
Uh, they already have a 911 Turbo, and that's exactly where all this **** belonged, because the Turbo is the true GTR competitor. The GT3 is simply the "it" car, so they've instead used it's popularity as a showcase for the new gimmicks. They even admitted that 4-wheel steering was intended for the 991 Turbo, but they couldn't help themselves.

Sadly, the Turbo will also have all this crap, which is pointless and too much overlap between the 911 models from a technology & philosophy standpoint, IMO.
Yup, spot-on.
Old 03-06-2013 | 01:24 PM
  #65  
Nizer's Avatar
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,727
Likes: 1,953
From: Wishing I Was At The Track
Default

Originally Posted by Mvez
Uh, they already have a 911 Turbo, and that's exactly where all this **** belonged, because the Turbo is the true GTR competitor. The GT3 is simply the "it" car, so they've instead used it's popularity as a showcase for the new gimmicks. They even admitted that 4-wheel steering was intended for the 991 Turbo, but they couldn't help themselves.
Agreed. As stated elsewhere, it seems the sales guys finally succeeded in rolling over AP and this is the result - the 14% price jump is evidence enough that the margin grab is on.

A faster car no doubt but much further away from the true GT3 soul.

Drop 100-150lbs and provide a manual option (PDK is fine for those that want it) then I'd be a lot more interested.
Old 03-06-2013 | 02:14 PM
  #66  
Guest89's Avatar
Guest89
Drifting
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 202
From: CHI / ATL
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Agreed. As stated elsewhere, it seems the sales guys finally succeeded in rolling over AP and this is the result - the 14% price jump is evidence enough that the margin grab is on.

A faster car no doubt but much further away from the true GT3 soul.

Drop 100-150lbs and provide a manual option (PDK is fine for those that want it) then I'd be a lot more interested.
There's nothing "GT3" about this new car except the mirrors that it shares with the cup car. Suspension, engine, transmission - never seen a race car.
Old 03-06-2013 | 03:00 PM
  #67  
lusoporsche's Avatar
lusoporsche
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Serious question: Why do a lot of people consider the GT3 a track only car? And focus on lap times and on the logic of PDK being much faster, etc, etc? I don't get it. It's a heavy, expensive car to buy and maintain.

If you want a serious track car the GT3 is not the best option. Get a Radical or something along those lines. It will be much faster, cheaper, more involving (it's "rawer", lighter, more aero, etc, etc) and a more intense experience.

For me the GT3 is the best possible "road racer" car, i.e. one that you can enjoy day to day driving and, when the opportunity arises, also take it to the track. Something that allows you to make a European roadtrip, drive in the ring and all the way back with usability yet great involvement and driving pleasure. At all speeds. Although I do get that autos are the way forward and that many people may actually really enjoy more driving with PDKs, I don't get the arguments against manual.

If you're not a professional racer you buy these cars for enjoyment, for feel, for driving pleasure. If you care about shaving 1 second off your lap times either invest in driving tuition or, again, buy a Radical, or second hand single seater.

I love manual boxes and it's a central part of driving pleasure to me. I'm saving up for that Ariel Atom, I'll keep my Cayman for road trips with the missus and the Atom for solo blasts! :-)
Old 03-06-2013 | 03:20 PM
  #68  
Nizer's Avatar
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,727
Likes: 1,953
From: Wishing I Was At The Track
Default

Originally Posted by lusoporsche
Serious question: Why do a lot of people consider the GT3 a track only car? And focus on lap times and on the logic of PDK being much faster, etc, etc? I don't get it. It's a heavy, expensive car to buy and maintain.

If you want a serious track car the GT3 is not the best option. Get a Radical or something along those lines. It will be much faster, cheaper, more involving (it's "rawer", lighter, more aero, etc, etc) and a more intense experience.

For me the GT3 is the best possible "road racer" car, i.e. one that you can enjoy day to day driving and, when the opportunity arises, also take it to the track. Something that allows you to make a European roadtrip, drive in the ring and all the way back with usability yet great involvement and driving pleasure. At all speeds. Although I do get that autos are the way forward and that many people may actually really enjoy more driving with PDKs, I don't get the arguments against manual.

If you're not a professional racer you buy these cars for enjoyment, for feel, for driving pleasure. If you care about shaving 1 second off your lap times either invest in driving tuition or, again, buy a Radical, or second hand single seater.

I love manual boxes and it's a central part of driving pleasure to me. I'm saving up for that Ariel Atom, I'll keep my Cayman for road trips with the missus and the Atom for solo blasts! :-)
Exactly. I don't even view Porsche as a car company anymore. They're a marketing company. Think about it: what other company markets a $150k car as a track day tool and then voids the warranty the second you step on track?

Simply brilliant.
Old 03-06-2013 | 04:21 PM
  #69  
paver's Avatar
paver
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 17
Default

Originally Posted by Nizer
Exactly. I don't even view Porsche as a car company anymore. They're a marketing company. Think about it: what other company markets a $150k car as a track day tool and then voids the warranty the second you step on track?

Simply brilliant.
Very true. And, look at the **** with the centerlocks for another example of your point. They way they have handled that to date is utterly dispicable and unforgiveable. I wonder how many of the guys drinking the 991 GT3 kool aid will still be happy if the 4200 mi CL maintenance schedules applies to the new "masterpeice"?
Old 03-06-2013 | 05:53 PM
  #70  
savyboy's Avatar
savyboy
Drifting
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 1
From: Reno NV
Default

Originally Posted by lusoporsche
Serious question: Why do a lot of people consider the GT3 a track only car? And focus on lap times and on the logic of PDK being much faster, etc, etc? I don't get it. It's a heavy, expensive car to buy and maintain.

If you want a serious track car the GT3 is not the best option. Get a Radical or something along those lines. It will be much faster, cheaper, more involving (it's "rawer", lighter, more aero, etc, etc) and a more intense experience.

For me the GT3 is the best possible "road racer" car, i.e. one that you can enjoy day to day driving and, when the opportunity arises, also take it to the track. Something that allows you to make a European roadtrip, drive in the ring and all the way back with usability yet great involvement and driving pleasure. At all speeds. Although I do get that autos are the way forward and that many people may actually really enjoy more driving with PDKs, I don't get the arguments against manual.

If you're not a professional racer you buy these cars for enjoyment, for feel, for driving pleasure. If you care about shaving 1 second off your lap times either invest in driving tuition or, again, buy a Radical, or second hand single seater.

I love manual boxes and it's a central part of driving pleasure to me. I'm saving up for that Ariel Atom, I'll keep my Cayman for road trips with the missus and the Atom for solo blasts! :-)
Another person has done the same soul-searching I have We only differ on my happiness with a paddle-shifted Hewland FTR vs a hand-stirred box of metal

Originally Posted by Nizer
Exactly. I don't even view Porsche as a car company anymore. They're a marketing company. Think about it: what other company markets a $150k car as a track day tool and then voids the warranty the second you step on track?
I see you have Kool-aid Immunity Syndrome...
Old 03-06-2013 | 07:52 PM
  #71  
stevecolletti's Avatar
stevecolletti
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,262
Likes: 5
From: Southern California
Default

Originally Posted by savyboy
Another person has done the same soul-searching I have We only differ on my happiness with a paddle-shifted Hewland FTR vs a hand-stirred box of metal
My only problem with that philosophy is that I'd have to have my racetrack at my home, hire someone to transport my toy back and forth to tracks, or drive a big, slow transporter of some type hundreds of miles for a few hours of fun.

Have you found an affordable way to around that?
Old 03-06-2013 | 08:58 PM
  #72  
-eztrader-'s Avatar
-eztrader-
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,944
Likes: 252
Default

Originally Posted by ZAMIRZ
Says the guy with the Challenge Stradale and Scuderia in his avatar
the main reason i've sold my ferraris is the trans.

great on track - -
no fun, not involving, boring on street
Old 03-07-2013 | 07:25 AM
  #73  
lusoporsche's Avatar
lusoporsche
Intermediate
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by stevecolletti
My only problem with that philosophy is that I'd have to have my racetrack at my home, hire someone to transport my toy back and forth to tracks, or drive a big, slow transporter of some type hundreds of miles for a few hours of fun.

Have you found an affordable way to around that?
Radicals, Ariel Atoms, Caterhams, are all street legal :-) (don't know in the states though). If you're doing hundreds of miles and then take to the track then it fits with (IMHO) the GT3 briefing is. Just find it strange the arguments that it's a track day car first and foremost, hence PDK, manuals are cr*p, etc...
Old 03-07-2013 | 08:57 AM
  #74  
scott40's Avatar
scott40
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 102
From: OH
Default

Originally Posted by -eztrader-
the main reason i've sold my ferraris is the trans.

great on track - -
no fun, not involving, boring on street
+1
Old 03-07-2013 | 11:46 AM
  #75  
wanna911's Avatar
wanna911
Race Car
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,728
Likes: 2
From: With A Manual Transmission
Default

Originally Posted by lusoporsche
Serious question: Why do a lot of people consider the GT3 a track only car? And focus on lap times and on the logic of PDK being much faster, etc, etc? I don't get it. It's a heavy, expensive car to buy and maintain.

If you want a serious track car the GT3 is not the best option. Get a Radical or something along those lines. It will be much faster, cheaper, more involving (it's "rawer", lighter, more aero, etc, etc) and a more intense experience.

For me the GT3 is the best possible "road racer" car, i.e. one that you can enjoy day to day driving and, when the opportunity arises, also take it to the track. Something that allows you to make a European roadtrip, drive in the ring and all the way back with usability yet great involvement and driving pleasure. At all speeds. Although I do get that autos are the way forward and that many people may actually really enjoy more driving with PDKs, I don't get the arguments against manual.

If you're not a professional racer you buy these cars for enjoyment, for feel, for driving pleasure. If you care about shaving 1 second off your lap times either invest in driving tuition or, again, buy a Radical, or second hand single seater.

I love manual boxes and it's a central part of driving pleasure to me. I'm saving up for that Ariel Atom, I'll keep my Cayman for road trips with the missus and the Atom for solo blasts! :-)
Good points. Certainly if lap times are people's only concerns they wouldn't opt for an NA, 6 cylinder, rear engine street car to begin with.


Quick Reply: No 6 speed in the GT3. Ugh.



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:01 AM.