When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
got it. That’s why I started the thread. My biggest concern about the RS are the increase in track costs. I think the .1 RS will hold its value. I can’t see it dropping below the 150s in the next several years as the .1 3s are still in the 130s with low miles.
I am on my second .1RS
Have logged about 30k miles with multiple track days, canyon runs etc.
I have been a P car owner for 30 years and have owned everything including CGT.
The 991RS is my favorite car of all time.
I sold my 1st 991RS for a 992TTS. The traded back for another 991RS 60 days later.
Lastly not one issue with the car over 30k miles and I drive hard almost every time im in it.
go with .2GT3 just for its engine itself. .1 engine regardless of regular or RS version has that stigma of Porsche **** up: And in fact that engine has design issues which in turn will exhibit in long run.
Do you have any proof of this or???
.1 RS engines have time and time again proven quite stout. Every engine will have some failures but to lump the rs engine in with the .1 GT3 is just wrong.
.1 RS engines have time and time again proven quite stout. Every engine will have some failures but to lump the rs engine in with the .1 GT3 is just wrong.
I have 30k miles across two cars with zero issues.
There's a lot of us here that love to track and love to go fast and do not like the way the RS looks. A bit "too much" is maybe the PC way to say it. So we "just" have a regular GT3 with no RS envy.
Agreed, as I think the RS looks rather ugly. The bolted on wing and bunch of unpainted parts do not look as good for a street car, but fine for a track-only toy.