Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Good starting point for track setup for 991.2 RS?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2019 | 05:10 PM
  #16  
Mr. Turtles's Avatar
Mr. Turtles
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 505
Received 39 Likes on 33 Posts
From: Ottawa, Ont
Default

i WISH I had this type of info for my .2 GT3....seems that NOBODY tracks a 991.2 2018 GT3...zero track set up info to read about and compare to.[/QUOTE]

I just PM'd you.

Old 07-19-2019 | 09:31 AM
  #17  
Maxi_z's Avatar
Maxi_z
Racer
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 484
Received 58 Likes on 37 Posts
From: Monaco
Default

A/S do you have any picture of your car with the lowered suspension?

Ham955 I also switched the top mounts on my 991.2 gt3 rs and using oem 7mm shims I could easely get to -3.1 front camber but of course in this way the total track width is less compared to oem top mounts fit and extra lower shims and with -3.1 camber even visually there is a lot of space between the top of tyres and fenders... Can you explain what way should be better and why?

Didn t porsche used the top mounts fitted that way as oem to widen the track on purpous instead of using a simple centered top mount as on the 991 gt3 non rs?

I know that those top mounts are fitted with the hole towards the inner part to get camber on the cup cars but maybe porsche just used them as an easy way to get larger front track on the rs?
Old 07-19-2019 | 10:40 AM
  #18  
A/S's Avatar
A/S
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 287 Likes on 131 Posts
From: U.S.
Default

Originally Posted by Maxi_z
A/S do you have any picture of your car with the lowered suspension?

Ham955 I also switched the top mounts on my 991.2 gt3 rs and using oem 7mm shims I could easely get to -3.1 front camber but of course in this way the total track width is less compared to oem top mounts fit and extra lower shims and with -3.1 camber even visually there is a lot of space between the top of tyres and fenders... Can you explain what way should be better and why?

Didn t porsche used the top mounts fitted that way as oem to widen the track on purpous instead of using a simple centered top mount as on the 991 gt3 non rs?

I know that those top mounts are fitted with the hole towards the inner part to get camber on the cup cars but maybe porsche just used them as an easy way to get larger front track on the rs?
Nope, but there are pictures of my car in multiple instagrams and facebook accounts, and lots of mobile phones.

My 991.2 GT3RS camber plates only have 3 holes, not like my 996 and 997 that had 6 holes and I could relocate the studs and gain more camber (and more space for tire). Unless the trick is to move the right side camber plate to the left, and vice-versa, they don't look adjustable to me.

I run a 295 front tire, it is right on the fender line, but I would love to move it inside the fender by another 10mm, despite losing 20mm of front track (negligible), but adding the benefit of less drag (a tire behaves like a wall once extending beyond body work). You can then run a 10mm wider tire (or a 1" wider wheel on the same tire) and gain contact patch. I always prefer the biggest front 911 tire I can fit.
Old 07-19-2019 | 12:01 PM
  #19  
Maxi_z's Avatar
Maxi_z
Racer
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 484
Received 58 Likes on 37 Posts
From: Monaco
Default

I moved the top mounts from left to right

They look the same as the porsche motorsport top mounts but switched left to right

Only thing the total width is slightly less but it s probably right like that as some porsche specialist confirmed that they switch them







Old 07-19-2019 | 12:03 PM
  #20  
A/S's Avatar
A/S
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 846
Likes: 0
Received 287 Likes on 131 Posts
From: U.S.
Default

Originally Posted by Maxi_z
I moved the top mounts from left to right

They look the same as the porsche motorsport top mounts but switched left to right

Only thing the total width is slightly less but it s probably right like that as some porsche specialist confirmed that they switch them

Awesome!!! and Thank you. You just helped me make my car a little faster around a road course.
Old 07-19-2019 | 12:12 PM
  #21  
Maxi_z's Avatar
Maxi_z
Racer
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 484
Received 58 Likes on 37 Posts
From: Monaco
Default

Originally Posted by A/S
Awesome!!! and Thank you. You just helped me make my car a little faster around a road course.
You should be able to take them out by unscrewing the lower arm where you fit the shims and compress the shock helper spring even if not much space

Keep in mind that you loose a little of total width (but if you use larger tyres you already say it s better for you) and that apart from the porsche motorsport cars and some advice I had no other proof that is correct to use them swapped or that nothing else should be changed or that it wont change other important

settings so have a look at everything to make sure it works well.
Old 10-14-2019 | 05:14 PM
  #22  
Gt3rsGT's Avatar
Gt3rsGT
2nd Gear
 
Joined: Oct 2019
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Hams955
Interesting.

FYI - flipping the camber plates on the front will yield your camber/castor numbers you want to hit without having the shim the bottom and mess with track width so much. Too much shim in the bottom it won't want to turn. Flip your plates and get your track width back in.

Secondly - rake - you're going the wrong way. You need to reduce rake if you want to get the car to rotate more. Inducing rake creates stability but will bind up the front more.

Third - based on spring rates and 2RS feedback as well as .2 Cup - you should really try more like 2.3-2.5 front and more like 2.8-3.0 rear with the above suggestions. If you are migrating to R7's then you definitely need -3.0 on the rear and at least -2.5 on the front. Little more in the rear in the case for this car.

Lastly - don't run the suspension in sport mode; it's too stiff to let the car roll and rotate. It will be faster in the soft mode.

- Chris.
Why is rear camber more than front? It makes sense for me since its a rear engine but most of the guys here are going more on fronts than rears?
Old 04-27-2020 | 05:37 PM
  #23  
DK7's Avatar
DK7
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 841
Received 104 Likes on 67 Posts
Default

Camber:
front: -2,5
rear: -2,0

sway bar:
front: hard
rear: medium

tyres: Cup2R

ride height low as possible
Old 04-28-2020 | 04:58 PM
  #24  
Emotion_Chris's Avatar
Emotion_Chris
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 82
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

Gt3rsGT. They are set that way from the factory because they are intended to understeer for those who aren't as aggressive.
Old 04-29-2020 | 07:56 AM
  #25  
sasportas's Avatar
sasportas
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 709
Likes: 0
Received 67 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

I switched my mounts left to right as well with no problem.

Added benefit is that the tires don't come close to running the fender and my castor is not abnormally high.
The following users liked this post:
Emotion_Chris (04-29-2020)
Old 04-29-2020 | 10:01 AM
  #26  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 29,444
Received 1,689 Likes on 786 Posts
From: S. Florida
Default

https://rennlist.com/forums/991-gt3-...ers-rs-76.html

Post 1131
Old 04-29-2020 | 01:40 PM
  #27  
Emotion_Chris's Avatar
Emotion_Chris
Former Vendor
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 82
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
From: Newport Beach, CA
Default

sasportas. That will work but you don't gain the benefit of widened track. Using shims for camber and thus widening the track is a huge benefit. We made shim style tension arms so you can easily adjust the caster back to where you won't have rubbing issues.
Old 04-29-2020 | 05:05 PM
  #28  
Nizer's Avatar
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,681
Received 1,908 Likes on 982 Posts
From: Wishing I Was At The Track
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Sebring setup .2 GT3RS.

Basically as low as I could go and still have good stopping power and suspension travel.

Front ride height: 103 (95mm being as low as the car can go).
Rear ride height: 252
Are those ride heights correct?
Old 04-29-2020 | 05:08 PM
  #29  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 29,444
Received 1,689 Likes on 786 Posts
From: S. Florida
Default

Yes.

Or what’s wrong?
Old 04-29-2020 | 06:36 PM
  #30  
Nizer's Avatar
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13,681
Received 1,908 Likes on 982 Posts
From: Wishing I Was At The Track
Default

What rake are you running?


Quick Reply: Good starting point for track setup for 991.2 RS?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:16 PM.