Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N0 vs N1 Cup 2 for 991 GT3

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-07-2018 | 12:18 AM
  #16  
911therapy's Avatar
911therapy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 987
Likes: 85
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
I went on Tire Rack to see what the other options are with the 20" wheels.

Trofeo R is very expensive, and when I tried them a few years ago with the Cayman R, the grip was only good for the first day or two, so I think they're out.

I noticed that Hoosier R7 is available in the correct size. I'm not keen on using a tire I can't drive to and from the track, but have long wondered what the GT3 would be like with a proper cheater tire. Has anyone tried the R7 and had any experience with the warranty being denied (or not)?
I have a 991.2 Gt3 and tracked two days on the N1 cup 2's. I was 1 full second faster at Barber with 991.2 vs. my old 991 gt3. I am convinced it was the car (engine and suspension) and not the No vs. N1 that created the 1 second improvement. I have two track days on the R7 and I have driven them on the street a few times (to and from gas station mostly)...if I have my choice, and I guess I do.....I will always run R7's at the track from here on out. Different grip level completely. Hopefully I dont break the bank running them. My goal is to get 3 track days out of a set of R7's....4 if the run times are fairly short
Old 08-07-2018 | 12:19 AM
  #17  
911therapy's Avatar
911therapy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 987
Likes: 85
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by robmypro


Have only tried Cup 2’s and Dunlops but i did have a conversation with someone and i have read that tires offering much better grip are correspondingly much harder on the car. If you do run non oem tires i would expect stuff to wear out much quicker, and Porsche to deny warranty claims for it. Just what i have heard and read.
hogwash, I think those folks are full it...but, granted, I have never had to pursue a warranty claim on any suspension components. And honestly, if I have a suspension issue, I'll probably just replace it with the best available aftermarket part available anyway. The only warranty items that I would be concerned about would be big ticket items..like PDK and engine.....And I am not worried about Porsche denying claims as to PDK and engine due to use of R7's. They will have trouble overcoming the Magnuson Moss Act.
Old 08-07-2018 | 12:23 AM
  #18  
GrantG's Avatar
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,298
Likes: 5,238
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by 911therapy
I have a 991.2 Gt3 and tracked two days on the N1 cup 2's. I was 1 full second faster at Barber with 991.2 vs. my old 991 gt3. I am convinced it was the car (engine and suspension) and not the No vs. N1 that created the 1 second improvement. I have two track days on the R7 and I have driven them on the street a few times (to and from gas station mostly)...if I have my choice, and I guess I do.....I will always run R7's at the track from here on out. Different grip level completely. Hopefully I dont break the bank running them. My goal is to get 3 track days out of a set of R7's....4 if the run times are fairly short
How much faster were your laps with Hoosiers?
Old 08-07-2018 | 12:30 AM
  #19  
911therapy's Avatar
911therapy
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 987
Likes: 85
From: Little Rock, Arkansas
Default

Originally Posted by GrantG

How much faster were your laps with Hoosiers?
I havent got to run Hoosiers at barber yet...will let you know Sept 7 and 8. But at Hallett (fairly short 1.8 mile track), the Hoosier was 1.5 seconds faster than N1 Cup 2's.
Old 08-07-2018 | 12:38 AM
  #20  
GrantG's Avatar
GrantG
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 18,298
Likes: 5,238
From: Denver
Default

Originally Posted by 911therapy
I havent got to run Hoosiers at barber yet...will let you know Sept 7 and 8. But at Hallett (fairly short 1.8 mile track), the Hoosier was 1.5 seconds faster than N1 Cup 2's.
Thanks
Old 08-07-2018 | 01:56 AM
  #21  
Mech33's Avatar
Mech33
Nordschleife Master
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 5,403
Likes: 635
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Grip of Hoosier is only marginally better then a fresh MPSC2.
Its faster but just as an FYI may car found about 3 seconds from MPSC2 to Hoosier at Sebring (2:15-2:12), BUT a lot of that speed comes from better gearing 19"-21" and a gigantic drop in Center Of Gravity and being able to drop the nose on the ground.
Ceramic rotors keep the front tires from overheating as much and that' alone I tested to be good for 0.5sec. With the nose on the ground, I can run Max wing, diffuser and Gurney lap and still no understeer.

I also respect the manual and have replaced the bearings, center locks, upright, etc as per manual.

I would love to try the RE71's but they only go to 295 I think.
How did ceramic rotors keep the front tires from overheating as much??
Old 08-07-2018 | 08:27 AM
  #22  
mdrums's Avatar
mdrums
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 15,358
Likes: 183
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by 911therapy
hogwash, I think those folks are full it...but, granted, I have never had to pursue a warranty claim on any suspension components. And honestly, if I have a suspension issue, I'll probably just replace it with the best available aftermarket part available anyway. The only warranty items that I would be concerned about would be big ticket items..like PDK and engine.....And I am not worried about Porsche denying claims as to PDK and engine due to use of R7's. They will have trouble overcoming the Magnuson Moss Act.
Thats not what the Magnuson Moss act is about.
Old 08-07-2018 | 08:28 AM
  #23  
mdrums's Avatar
mdrums
Race Director
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 15,358
Likes: 183
From: Tampa
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
How did ceramic rotors keep the front tires from overheating as much??
Because they don’t transfer heat like iron do...they do not retain the heat like iron do
Old 08-07-2018 | 08:49 AM
  #24  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 29,449
Likes: 1,692
From: S. Florida
Default

Originally Posted by Mech33
How did ceramic rotors keep the front tires from overheating as much??
No two red hot rotors to heat up the rim.

Really threw my off, I couldn’t get the front PSI to come up like before either.
Old 08-07-2018 | 08:53 AM
  #25  
Manifold's Avatar
Manifold
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 13,422
Likes: 4,606
From: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Default

Moderator: Could you please change the thread title to "N0 vs N1 Cup 2 (and other tire options) for 991 GT3"?

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Grip of Hoosier is only marginally better then a fresh MPSC2.
Its faster but just as an FYI may car found about 3 seconds from MPSC2 to Hoosier at Sebring (2:15-2:12), BUT a lot of that speed comes from better gearing 19"-21" and a gigantic drop in Center Of Gravity and being able to drop the nose on the ground.
Originally Posted by 911therapy
I havent got to run Hoosiers at barber yet...will let you know Sept 7 and 8. But at Hallett (fairly short 1.8 mile track), the Hoosier was 1.5 seconds faster than N1 Cup 2's.
That sounds like about the delta I'd expect, and isn't a small delta. With Hoosiers, I expect that the 991.1 GT3 will about match the pace of a 996 Cup on slicks.

Originally Posted by 911therapy
I have a 991.2 Gt3 and tracked two days on the N1 cup 2's. I was 1 full second faster at Barber with 991.2 vs. my old 991 gt3. I am convinced it was the car (engine and suspension) and not the No vs. N1 that created the 1 second improvement. I have two track days on the R7 and I have driven them on the street a few times (to and from gas station mostly)...if I have my choice, and I guess I do.....I will always run R7's at the track from here on out. Different grip level completely. Hopefully I dont break the bank running them. My goal is to get 3 track days out of a set of R7's....4 if the run times are fairly short
I too am becoming convinced that the significantly faster lap time of the 991.2 vs .1 GT3 has little or nothing to do with the N1 vs N0 tires. And it's impressive that Porsche was able to do that, making the .2 GT3 even faster than the .1 RS.
Old 08-07-2018 | 09:01 AM
  #26  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 29,449
Likes: 1,692
From: S. Florida
Default

And it's impressive that Porsche was able to do that, making the .2 GT3 even faster than the .1 RS.
Debatable.
Old 08-07-2018 | 09:44 AM
  #27  
Manifold's Avatar
Manifold
Thread Starter
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 13,422
Likes: 4,606
From: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
Debatable.
'ring lap time of 991.2 GT3 was substantially faster than .1 RS. Do we have data from other tracks to use for comparison? Doesn't seem like the .2 GT3 should be faster than the .1 RS, but I defer to the data.

Old 08-07-2018 | 09:53 AM
  #28  
TRAKCAR's Avatar
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 29,449
Likes: 1,692
From: S. Florida
Default

The Ring changed too much and the .1RS never set a real dry flyer.

I can only gauge when on track with equal drivers in front and behind me.
Same out of the corner, GT3 a little faster over 80-100MPH and GT3 a little slower in corners.
I figure it just about balances out at Sebring, Tire per tire.
Old 08-07-2018 | 10:59 AM
  #29  
991DUC's Avatar
991DUC
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 71
Likes: 32
From: Zionsville, IN
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
The Ring changed too much and the .1RS never set a real dry flyer.

I can only gauge when on track with equal drivers in front and behind me.
Same out of the corner, GT3 a little faster over 80-100MPH and GT3 a little slower in corners.
I figure it just about balances out at Sebring, Tire per tire.

I agree with trakcar’s assesment that the 991.2 gt3 and 991.1 rs are very close on similar tires.

I would add that I think the new N1 compound might last a little longer than the N0. I switched from a 400 hp 991 3.8 carrera 2s on N0 Mpsc2 to the 500hp 991.2 gt3 on N1 MPSC2 and am getting similar tire life despite running 2+ seconds a lap faster on a 1.8 mile track.
Old 08-07-2018 | 06:37 PM
  #30  
KBS911's Avatar
KBS911
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 134
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
The Ring changed too much and the .1RS never set a real dry flyer.

I can only gauge when on track with equal drivers in front and behind me.
Same out of the corner, GT3 a little faster over 80-100MPH and GT3 a little slower in corners.
I figure it just about balances out at Sebring, Tire per tire.
Yes, I read the Christian Gebhart (spelling) ran in wet/not damp conditions on much of the Ring track during the .1 RS test. I think the Ring has been repaved in sections as well since that test. Who cares? Porsche will never build a slower car than it's predecessor. All things considered I believe the .1 RS is certainly on equal terms and is every bit the match for the .2 GT3, and closer to the .2 RS with same tires and track conditions. Closer not faster. In the end, for DE warriors, it comes down to drivers difference on any given track.


Quick Reply: N0 vs N1 Cup 2 for 991 GT3



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:44 AM.