Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

AP on the GT3RS.2 and questions on suspension

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-10-2018, 08:58 AM
  #91  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,318
Received 4,503 Likes on 2,561 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer

incremental changes at best the largest of which is the 20hp with 0 torque increase. Nothing huge or drastic by any stretch. Headers, BBi suspension package and new mpsc and the .1RS is faster without breaking a sweat.

I seriously doubt it. With equal tires, I estimate that the lap time improvement of the .2 will be maybe 1-1.5 s at a typical US track, which is not a small difference.

Also, don't forget the praise for the new engine and the 9K redline - not all 4.0L are created the same.

I hope you're not still on a campaign to convince people that your RS is the best, nothing else could be significantly better, and it can't lose value.
Old 03-10-2018, 09:10 AM
  #92  
Jrtaylor9
Rennlist Member
 
Jrtaylor9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: East Hampton / NYC
Posts: 3,824
Received 1,103 Likes on 546 Posts
Default

^^^save your breath
Old 03-10-2018, 10:17 AM
  #93  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Manifold
I seriously doubt it. With equal tires, I estimate that the lap time improvement of the .2 will be maybe 1-1.5 s at a typical US track, which is not a small difference.

Also, don't forget the praise for the new engine and the 9K redline - not all 4.0L are created the same.

I hope you're not still on a campaign to convince people that your RS is the best, nothing else could be significantly better, and it can't lose value.
If the .1RS didn’t need headers, BBi suspension and the new tires to be just as fast it would be just as good from a speed standpoint already. No?

My point is that the changes/improvements are incremental to the same platform. Many of those improvements can be duplicated or equivalent by .1RS owners.

I love the WP. I am hoping for an allocation. If I get one at msrp I will buy the new car. What’s not to like?


Old 03-10-2018, 11:10 AM
  #94  
Manifold
Rennlist Member
 
Manifold's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mid-Atlantic (on land, not in the middle of the ocean)
Posts: 13,318
Received 4,503 Likes on 2,561 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Waxer


If the .1RS didn’t need headers, BBi suspension and the new tires to be just as fast it would be just as good from a speed standpoint already. No?

My point is that the changes/improvements are incremental to the same platform. Many of those improvements can be duplicated or equivalent by .1RS owners.

I love the WP. I am hoping for an allocation. If I get one at msrp I will buy the new car. What’s not to like?


Increments in numerous areas, when integrated well, can have a substantial effect. Porsche knows what it's doing, and isn't going leave easy improvements on the table for modders to pick up.

As I said before, I wouldn't trade a .1 RS to get the .2 RS, but I have no doubt that the .2 is a significantly more capable car overall.
Old 03-12-2018, 06:03 AM
  #95  
C.J. Ichiban
Platinum Dealership
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
C.J. Ichiban's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Exit Row seats
Posts: 9,837
Received 2,373 Likes on 635 Posts
Default

I think what waxer is saying:

I can tune my car up for 20k and get more aggressive Modded parts and therefore increase the performance of my current car.

It's within reason that
a full exhaust +7-8 hp
Tuned ECU + 12-15 hp
Rose jointed susp mod = .5-1.0 seconds/ lap
Bolt on diffuser = easy


Makes sense to me
Old 03-12-2018, 08:17 PM
  #96  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
I think what waxer is saying:

I can tune my car up for 20k and get more aggressive Modded parts and therefore increase the performance of my current car.

It's within reason that
a full exhaust +7-8 hp
Tuned ECU + 12-15 hp
Rose jointed susp mod = .5-1.0 seconds/ lapn
Bolt on diffuser = easy


Makes sense to me
Thanks CJ! That is my point. Very simple.
.1GT3RS fast.
.2GT3RS incrementally faster. 997.2RS to .1RS was a major step up in performance.
Some $ for mods .1RS is just as fast. BBi makes a beautiful suspension kit with rose jointed control arms. Nice Dundon headers and an ECU flash. Some updated MPSC's.

Fact is very few here regularly track their $200K+ street/track RS and wring it 10/10ths to extract every fraction of a second out of it to justify the cost of making the change for the incremental improvement. Very few can even extract 10/10ths from a .1RS anyway except guys like Peter, CJ and a few others here. If its a choice between trading to a new .2RS and losing $$$ on the .1RS and adding more $$$ for the incremental improvement in performance with the .2 one can probably save money and mod the .1RS for alot less and get damn near the same increment in improvement. We are talking about a "track" rat RS at this point so resale is out the window anyway.

Me? I don't track my .1RS. It costs way too much based on my means to risk track damage. I stuffed my TA2 Boss into a tire wall last fall. It was a $25K event. With the RS it would have easily been a $75K event before we even get to dimunition in value.

I enjoy my RS on weekend spirited drives and just owning and looking at it and the thrill of driving such a beast.
My interest in the new one is purely for the aesthetics of the WP and being able to spec an GT/RS for the first time. I love the WP and it's worth it to me to buy one if I get it at msrp.

Last edited by Waxer; 03-12-2018 at 09:09 PM.
Old 03-12-2018, 08:24 PM
  #97  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,424
Received 1,675 Likes on 777 Posts
Default

295 / 345 19” Hoosiers grip and the more sane ride height that comes from 19” does more than the .2 updates or .1 tuning for lap times.
Old 03-12-2018, 09:06 PM
  #98  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TRAKCAR
295 / 345 19” Hoosiers grip and the more sane ride height that comes from 19” does more than the .2 updates or .1 tuning for lap times.
Well if anyone ought to know....
Thanks Pete.
Old 03-12-2018, 09:18 PM
  #99  
rosenbergendo
Drifting
 
rosenbergendo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,733
Received 646 Likes on 308 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by C.J. Ichiban
I think what waxer is saying:

I can tune my car up for 20k and get more aggressive Modded parts and therefore increase the performance of my current car.

It's within reason that
a full exhaust +7-8 hp
Tuned ECU + 12-15 hp
Rose jointed susp mod = .5-1.0 seconds/ lap
Bolt on diffuser = easy


Makes sense to me
Dundon claims 50hp from their header setup...lol! First time I've seen the correct figure for their exhaust. So much overrated BS that people buy into.
Old 03-13-2018, 08:31 AM
  #100  
C2Spin
Rennlist Member
 
C2Spin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: KY, USA
Posts: 724
Received 97 Likes on 69 Posts
Default

Latest blurb I saw from AP is that the new RS will be at least 10 to 12 or maybe 15 seconds quicker than the predecessor around the Ring and that's a lot.

Facebook Post
Old 03-13-2018, 05:54 PM
  #101  
Nizer
Rennlist Member
 
Nizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Wishing I Was At The Track
Posts: 13,663
Received 1,889 Likes on 973 Posts
Default

4.4lbs saved from front bumper? That's impressive.
Old 03-13-2018, 07:14 PM
  #102  
Mvez
Rennlist Member
 
Mvez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes on 112 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fxz
^well said

and it's the first time the GT3RS don't need KW or Blistein to make it what it must be

finally I want this .2 GT3RS because is a "no car n coffee" version
This.

If I had a .1RS, and couldn't get an MSRP or reasonable allocation, I would most definitely throw a set of Ohlins or Bilstein at it and go hassle the newer cars.
You will get way more lap-time performance out of a good set of tires and suspension than you will chasing a few extra HP, in a .1RS. And by suspension, I'm not talking about some monoball control arm package, I'm talking about a real suspension upgrade.

I fully expect my 6MT .2 w/Ohlins to lap as quick or quicker than a .1RS at most tracks on similar tires, and be able to hassle a .2RS.
Old 03-13-2018, 07:18 PM
  #103  
TRAKCAR
Rennlist Member
 
TRAKCAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: S. Florida
Posts: 29,424
Received 1,675 Likes on 777 Posts
Default

I dunno, the stock floppy shocks and springs deal with Sebring pretty decently.
often better then some of the CUPS.
Old 03-13-2018, 08:05 PM
  #104  
consolidated
Drifting
 
consolidated's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,587
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Agree, I can see the benefit at Nurburgring and big flowing European tracks. US tracks less so. Softer setups at COTA seem to be current thinking.
Old 03-13-2018, 08:19 PM
  #105  
Waxer
Nordschleife Master
 
Waxer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 5,435
Received 816 Likes on 429 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by consolidated
Agree, I can see the benefit at Nurburgring and big flowing European tracks. US tracks less so. Softer setups at COTA seem to be current thinking.
This is why they make adjustable shocks e.g. KW and Ohlins.
Stiffer not always better depending on circuit.


Quick Reply: AP on the GT3RS.2 and questions on suspension



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:52 AM.