991 Cup Car Suspension Overview and GT3 Comparison
#31
Not sure you really want to do that. I doubt the performance is that different (with same piston count and rotor dimensions). I think one desirable trait one might like to borrow from the Cup's brakes & suspension is the ability to run 18" wheels, but that looks to be impossible from Bart's post (seems the Rear Wheel Steering and its geometry prevents that). If I were to consider upgrading the brakes, it would likely be Movit carbon or similar.
#32
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Larger and Lighter carbon rotors gives the advantages of PCCB (handling, braking, acceleration, ride comfort improvements from lower rotating/unsprung mass) while lasting WAY longer (not just a thin veneer of carbon-ceramic friction surface , full thickness that barely wears and can even be repaired). PFC's are steel in the smaller stock dimensions (but you don't get the advantage of 18" wheels with the GT3 that you do with the Cup).
Update: Upon receiving additional information from an end-user of the Movits - it seems that they too can be overheated to the point that their longtime use can be jeopardized (despite showing no visible wear). So, maybe we are still at the point that steels are preferable for hard track use.
But if using steels, I am not sure exactly what benefits one would gain from the PFC system on a street-driven GT3 (aside from a cosmetic appearance some may prefer). Pure race calipers often have no piston dust seals and can be problematic if one doesn't intend to service them often.
Update: Upon receiving additional information from an end-user of the Movits - it seems that they too can be overheated to the point that their longtime use can be jeopardized (despite showing no visible wear). So, maybe we are still at the point that steels are preferable for hard track use.
But if using steels, I am not sure exactly what benefits one would gain from the PFC system on a street-driven GT3 (aside from a cosmetic appearance some may prefer). Pure race calipers often have no piston dust seals and can be problematic if one doesn't intend to service them often.
Last edited by GrantG; 09-18-2014 at 09:09 PM.
#33
Larger and Lighter carbon rotors gives the advantages of PCCB (handling, braking, acceleration, ride comfort improvements from lower rotating/unsprung mass) while lasting WAY longer (not just a thin veneer of carbon-ceramic friction surface , full thickness that barely wears and can even be repaired). PFC's are steel in the smaller stock dimensions (but you don't get the advantage of 18" wheels with the GT3 that you do with the Cup). Update: Upon receiving additional information from an end-user of the Movits - it seems that they too can be overheated to the point that their longtime use can be jeopardized (despite showing no visible wear). So, maybe we are still at the point that steels are preferable for hard track use. But if using steels, I am not sure exactly what benefits one would gain from the PFC system on a street-driven GT3 (aside from a cosmetic appearance some may prefer). Pure race calipers often have no piston dust seals and can be problematic if one doesn't intend to service them often.
True CCBs (Movit, or others/PCCBs) will have a slight advantage in terms of breaking, handling, longer ware etc. But for track duty it's better to go with steels as the cost to benefit with CCBs don't justify, unless I am a top budget race team (which I'm clearly not).
The reason I mention PFCs, is because it would be nice to have better performance of PFC Cup (if any, as a pose to OEM Brembo) for the cost of steels.
If going for Movit, why not go with standard PCCBs? I'm not familiar with Movit, that's why I ask.
#34
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Thanks for clarifying that Grant, much appreciated.
True CCBs (Movit, or others/PCCBs) will have a slight advantage in terms of breaking, handling, longer ware etc. But for track duty it's better to go with steels as the cost to benefit with CCBs don't justify, unless I am a top budget race team (which I'm clearly not).
The reason I mention PFCs, is because it would be nice to have better performance of PFC Cup (if any, as a pose to OEM Brembo) for the cost of steels.
If going for Movit, why not go with standard PCCBs? I'm not familiar with Movit, that's why I ask.
True CCBs (Movit, or others/PCCBs) will have a slight advantage in terms of breaking, handling, longer ware etc. But for track duty it's better to go with steels as the cost to benefit with CCBs don't justify, unless I am a top budget race team (which I'm clearly not).
The reason I mention PFCs, is because it would be nice to have better performance of PFC Cup (if any, as a pose to OEM Brembo) for the cost of steels.
If going for Movit, why not go with standard PCCBs? I'm not familiar with Movit, that's why I ask.
#35
Rennlist Member
#36
Race Director
Larger and Lighter carbon rotors gives the advantages of PCCB (handling, braking, acceleration, ride comfort improvements from lower rotating/unsprung mass) while lasting WAY longer (not just a thin veneer of carbon-ceramic friction surface , full thickness that barely wears and can even be repaired). PFC's are steel in the smaller stock dimensions (but you don't get the advantage of 18" wheels with the GT3 that you do with the Cup).
#37
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Grant, according to Porsche, the Gen III PCCB's developed for the 918 and used on the GT3, have a much higher ceramic content than the previous versions. Do you (or anyone) have any hard information on how much of a difference there is and how the new PCCB's might compare to aftermarket offerings? If we're still dealing with a ceramic veneer is it at least a thicker veneer?
Last edited by Elephant Bart; 09-19-2014 at 02:57 PM.
#39
Race Director
Thanks, Bart. Someone correct ME if I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that the new 410mm front and 390mm rear ceramics from the 918 are only available on the Turbo and the GT3. I don't think they are yet available across the model range which would include the 2014 C2S. The Carrera brakes are about $1K cheaper. The size of the new brakes is also printed on the rotor hub....
#40
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I think you are right. Aside from larger dimensions, I am not sure how the compostion of the rotors may differ between PCCB on 991S and GT3.
#41
It's not clear if Porsche decided to go with PFC brakes because of performance advantage or because of clearance issues. in another thread (link) I demonstrated how the front calipers will not clear 18" wheels on the cup car. The change to PFC from Brembo may be as simple as that. Brembo brakes may be just as adequate on the track as PFC.
It would be interesting to know the performance comparison between the Brembo and PFC on track and whether it's worth a swap. But as your last sentence says, Brembo might be just as adequate as PFC on track.
#42
Rennlist Member
Thanks for your hard work--very informative! A few thoughts and questions:
Once again, thanks for all the info!
- The choice of 20" wheels on the street car intrigues me. The cynic in me says that Porsche chose 20" wheels as more of a nod toward fashion trends, and not performance. This disappoints me. I think this because the Boxster and Cayman S come with 20" wheels, which are clearly too large for such a small car. The brakes get lost in those giant wagon wheels, but they sure have 'bling.' Porsche probably felt that, if the Boxster and Cayman had 20" wheels, the GT3 certainly had to have them as well, especially if they're pitching this new car to more of a mainstream audience.
- So, then, did Porsche first decide on 20" wheels as a design parameter, and then just designed suspension components with the knowledge that they had plenty of clearance available? Or did the suspension design and rear steering mechanism, etc., come first, which necessitated a 20" wheel?
- Similarly, the brakes. It's telling that drilled rotors are used on the street car, while the Cup car has slotted rotors. Slotted rotors have been proven time and time again to be superior on track in race applications, but they have less of a 'bling' factor than drilled rotors. So once again Porsche makes a design/equipment decision on the street car for a nod to mass appeal, rather than for pure performance.
- Are the changes made to the suspension of the Cup car purely based on the need to fit an 18" wheel, as mandated by many of the race series, or are the changes primarily based on improving the street suspension to make it more fitting for track use?
Once again, thanks for all the info!
#43
Three Wheelin'
Thanks for your hard work--very informative! A few thoughts and questions:
Once again, thanks for all the info!
- The choice of 20" wheels on the street car intrigues me. The cynic in me says that Porsche chose 20" wheels as more of a nod toward fashion trends, and not performance. This disappoints me. I think this because the Boxster and Cayman S come with 20" wheels, which are clearly too large for such a small car. The brakes get lost in those giant wagon wheels, but they sure have 'bling.' Porsche probably felt that, if the Boxster and Cayman had 20" wheels, the GT3 certainly had to have them as well, especially if they're pitching this new car to more of a mainstream audience.
- So, then, did Porsche first decide on 20" wheels as a design parameter, and then just designed suspension components with the knowledge that they had plenty of clearance available? Or did the suspension design and rear steering mechanism, etc., come first, which necessitated a 20" wheel?
- Similarly, the brakes. It's telling that drilled rotors are used on the street car, while the Cup car has slotted rotors. Slotted rotors have been proven time and time again to be superior on track in race applications, but they have less of a 'bling' factor than drilled rotors. So once again Porsche makes a design/equipment decision on the street car for a nod to mass appeal, rather than for pure performance.
- Are the changes made to the suspension of the Cup car purely based on the need to fit an 18" wheel, as mandated by many of the race series, or are the changes primarily based on improving the street suspension to make it more fitting for track use?
Once again, thanks for all the info!
Drilling is cheaper than slotting.
Ryan